San Antonio vs Lexington: match statistics
San Antonio vs Lexington: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
San Antonio played Lexington in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
San Antonio: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match. Lexington: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
San Antonio scores 1.00 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Lexington scores 1.33 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: San Antonio 33%, Lexington 33%. Over 2.5: San Antonio 33%, Lexington 67%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Lexington has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.33. San Antonio: 12.7 shots per match, Lexington: 13.3.
Match halves
San Antonio: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Lexington: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
San Antonio: 0-15 (1 goals). Lexington: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
San Antonio dominate available home stats: 100% home wins, 1.5 goals per match and only 0.5 GA with xG_for 1.62, indicating offensive efficiency and defensive solidity. Recent form (lwdww) and PPG 2 confirm good condition. Lexington, despite 13 goals in last five overall, sit low (10th) and lack reliable away data, suggesting weaker away performances. San Antonio also have 50% home CS, reducing visitors' scoring chances. Given home advantage and limited guest away data, forecast favors a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Low BTTS probability: San Antonio show strong defensive season metrics (seasonConcededAVG 0.67, seasonCSPercentage 67%) and L5 concede little (ga_l5 3, avg 0.6). Both teams have low L5 BTTS (20% each), indicating mutual scoring is rare. Lexington’s superior L5 attack (gf_last5_away 13) is unlikely to overcome San Antonio’s solidity. Season BTTS 33% vs CS 67% and league CS trends favor one side keeping a clean sheet. Recommendation: BTTS = NO.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Stats show San Antonio generates ~1.34 xG and averages 1.33 goals with solid defense (0.67 GA). Opponent data incomplete, but last-5 indicates visiting side can score, raising probability of at least two goals. League avg total 2.74; our expected 2.30 suggests moderate Over2.5 chances but clear preference for Over1.5. Considering xG, home form and fragmentary away data, Over 1.5 is the most certain signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
San Antonio show clearly better offensive and defensive stats (seasonScoredAVG 1.33 vs no data for Lexington, xG_for 1.34, xG_against 1.23) and a strong second half (high AVG_2hg and goals 61–90'). At Half-Time hosts often draw (scoredAVGHT 0.33, drawingAtHTPercentage 67% and seasonCSPercentageHT 100%), indicating low first-half scoring. The second half is more decisive for San Antonio, pointing to HT draw and FT home win as the likely scenario. Alternatives such as HT draw/FT draw or hosts leading at HT are possible but less probable.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| San Antonio | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
San Antonio is 75% better for: last-5 form.
2.33 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.33 pts / match - Lexington
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lexington is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - San Antonio · 1.33 goals / match - Lexington
San Antonio is 103% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.33 goals / match - San Antonio · 0.67 goals / match - Lexington
San Antonio scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).
Lexington scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - San Antonio
Over / Under - Lexington
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lexington - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.67 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.67 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Average goals in match | 0.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 33% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
San Antonio
Lexington
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| San Antonio | Liga | Lexington | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.33 | 2.73 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 58% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 58% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 26% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 33% | 58% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 89% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): San Antonio 1 - 0 - 1 Lexington. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of San Antonio vs Lexington?
The USL Championship match finished San Antonio 2:0 Lexington. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between San Antonio and Lexington?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches San Antonio won 1, Lexington won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before San Antonio vs Lexington?
San Antonio score 1.00 goals per game on average and Lexington 1.33. The USL Championship average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 33% of San Antonio's matches and 33% of Lexington's.
What form are San Antonio and Lexington in?
Over the last 5 games San Antonio have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and Lexington 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Antonio vs Lexington?
The statistical background for San Antonio vs Lexington — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.