United States - USL ChampionshipToyota FieldData current as of 18 October 2026

San Antonio vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: match statistics

San Antonio vs Tampa Bay Rowdies: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Antonio played Tampa Bay Rowdies in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: Toyota Field. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

San Antonio: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tampa Bay Rowdies: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Antonio scores 1.16 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Tampa Bay Rowdies scores 1.80 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Antonio 48%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 40%. Over 2.5: San Antonio 44%, Tampa Bay Rowdies 44%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Tampa Bay Rowdies has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.37. San Antonio: 12.2 shots per match, Tampa Bay Rowdies: 15.5.

Match halves

San Antonio: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64. Tampa Bay Rowdies: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.04.

Goals by minute

San Antonio: 46-60 (6 goals). Tampa Bay Rowdies: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Tampa Bay Rowdies top the table and have recorded 15 wins and just 4 defeats throughout the season, while San Antonio have won 9 of their 25 matches. The visitors are particularly solid away from home: they win 54% of their matches, concede just 0.69 goals on average, and keep a clean sheet in 54% of their outings. San Antonio do create more quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.62 compared with their opponents’ 1.55, but they score only 1.17 goals per game and fail to score in 42% of their home matches. The hosts’ recent form is far from convincing, having scored just 3 goals and secured only one win in their last five matches, while Rowdies have scored 7 times during the same period. The defensive class gap and the visitors’ significantly higher conversion rate—10% versus 8%—support a narrow away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - No is clear, as both teams have recorded this outcome infrequently during the season: San Antonio in 42% of matches and Tampa Bay Rowdies in 38%, compared with the league average of 54%. Over their last five matches, the figures have fallen further to 40% for the hosts and just 20% for the visitors, while San Antonio have scored only 3 goals during this period, averaging 0.6 per match. The defenses regularly restrict their opponents, as confirmed by clean-sheet rates of 50% for the hosts and 54% for the visitors, as well as averages of just 0.6 and 0.8 goals conceded respectively in their last five appearances. Although the hosts produce a seasonally high xG of 1.95, Tampa Bay concede only 0.69 goals per match on average, making the outcome in which at least one team fails to score the more likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams points to a clear decline in scoring tempo: San Antonio have scored 3 goals and conceded 3 in their last five matches, while Tampa Bay have scored 7 and conceded just 4. The hosts are currently averaging only 0.6 goals per match, despite their season average of 2.33, which significantly reduces the relevance of high-scoring results from the campaign as a whole. The defenses also look stable in terms of qualitative data, with both teams allowing xG of 1.16 in their last five appearances. Historically, Tampa Bay recorded fewer than 3.5 goals in 85% of matches, while the combined profile of both teams has finished below this line far more often than it has exceeded four goals. The projected total of 2.12 goals gives the safest edge to Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time and full-time, as San Antonio went into the break level in 4 of its last 5 matches, scoring just 0.2 goals per game before half-time during that period. Tampa Bay concede an average of only 0.23 goals in first halves across the season and have kept a clean sheet at the break in 77% of matches, limiting the hosts’ chances of taking an early lead. Both teams also have solid full-match defensive metrics: San Antonio keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while Tampa Bay do so in 54%. Although the hosts have greater season-long attacking potential, averaging 2.33 goals per game compared with the visitors’ 1.31, their recent run has produced only 0.6 goals per match and as many as 60% draws. Tampa Bay are currently more consistent in terms of results, averaging 1.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded over their last five matches, making a balanced scenario that remains level until the final whistle more likely than a clear victory for either side.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
16Shots4
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
5Shots on target0
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1.72xG0.63
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
6Corners6
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
49Dangerous attacks50
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
16Fouls16
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1Cards1
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1.16Goals scored / match1.8
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1.12Goals conceded / match0.92
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
53%Average possession53%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
3.72Shots on target / match4.88
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.16Shots per match15.48
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
3.72Shots on target4.88
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
9.5%Shot conversion11.6%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
53%Possession53%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1.37xG for1.74
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1.36xG against1.15
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

Shooting quality

San Antonio: BalancedTampa Bay Rowdies: Attacking
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.4 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

San Antonio
LWDLD
Season result split
36% W40% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-6
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tampa Bay Rowdies
LDWLW
Season result split
60% W24% D16% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-4
2.04 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-4-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 55% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - San Antonio · 1.8 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.12 goals / match - San Antonio · 0.92 goals / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

San Antonio scoring profile: mixed

San Antonio scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while Tampa Bay Rowdies keeps a clean sheet in 52% (13 of 25 matches).

Tampa Bay Rowdies scoring profile: very strong

Tampa Bay Rowdies scores in 88% of matches (22 of 25 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).

29Goals scored (season)45
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
28Goals conceded (season)23
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
2.28Average goals in match2.72
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
3Goals scored (last 5)7
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal88%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
36%2 goals52%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
16%3 goals28%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
4%4 goals8%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal48%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
32%2 goals24%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
12%3 goals12%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
4%4 goals8%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
Tampa Bay Rowdies - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 25 matches
54%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time8%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
8%BTTS in both halves4%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
28%Scored in both halves28%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
40%BTTS - last 520%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tampa Bay Rowdies is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.84 pts / match - Tampa Bay Rowdies

San Antonio - half-time state
36% leading48% draw16% trailing
Tampa Bay Rowdies - half-time state
52% leading28% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)1.84
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
0.52Goals scored (1st half)0.76
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1Average goals (1st half)1.2
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
72%Clean sheet before half-time72%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
56%No goal before half-time48%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.68
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1.04
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.52
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
52%Clean sheet after half-time60%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies
56%No goal after half-time36%
San AntonioTampa Bay Rowdies

San Antonio - second-half results

24% W52% D24% L
39
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tampa Bay Rowdies - second-half results

44% W36% D20% L
46
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Antonio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match0.21.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Tampa Bay Rowdies - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Antonio
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
5
31-45
6
7
46-60
4
3
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Tampa Bay Rowdies
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
8
5
16-30
5
3
31-45
9
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
16
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Antonio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Tampa Bay Rowdies

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.64
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

San AntonioLigaTampa Bay Rowdies
Average goals in match▼ 2.282.72• 2.72
Both teams scored▼ 48%54%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 44%50%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 36%28%▲ 52%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%65%▲ 72%
Goal after half-time▼ 64%78%▼ 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Tampa Bay RowdiesYellow cardSebastian Cruz
  2. San AntonioSubstitutionOn: Lilian RicolOff: Christian Sorto
  3. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Louis PerezOff: Russell Cicerone
  4. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Marco MicalettoOff: Evan Conway
  5. Tampa Bay RowdiesSubstitutionOn: Karsen HenderlongOff: Matthew Dyan Myers
  6. San AntonioYellow cardAkeem Ward

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): San Antonio 1 - 1 - 0 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

San Antonio FC
1 : 0
Tampa Bay Rowdies
Tampa Bay Rowdies
2 : 2
San Antonio

FAQ

What was the result of San Antonio vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

The USL Championship match finished San Antonio 0:0 Tampa Bay Rowdies. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between San Antonio and Tampa Bay Rowdies?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches San Antonio won 1, Tampa Bay Rowdies won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before San Antonio vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

San Antonio score 1.16 goals per game on average and Tampa Bay Rowdies 1.80. The USL Championship average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 48% of San Antonio's matches and 40% of Tampa Bay Rowdies's.

What form are San Antonio and Tampa Bay Rowdies in?

Over the last 5 games San Antonio have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tampa Bay Rowdies 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Antonio vs Tampa Bay Rowdies?

The statistical background for San Antonio vs Tampa Bay Rowdies — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.