San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: match statistics
San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
San Antonio played Tulsa Roughnecks in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 6 September 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
San Antonio: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Tulsa Roughnecks: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
San Antonio scores 1.31 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.29 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: San Antonio 50%, Tulsa Roughnecks 50%. Over 2.5: San Antonio 44%, Tulsa Roughnecks 36%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
San Antonio has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.29. San Antonio: 11.7 shots per match, Tulsa Roughnecks: 10.9.
Match halves
San Antonio: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69. Tulsa Roughnecks: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
San Antonio: 16-30 (4 goals). Tulsa Roughnecks: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-3. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tulsa Roughnecks are slight favorites, as they sit 6th, have 10 wins this season, and have collected 9 points from their last five matches, compared with San Antonio’s 7 points over the same period. The key factor is the visitors’ current defensive form: they have conceded just 3 goals in their last five games, compared with 7 for the hosts, and have allowed 19 goals across the campaign, versus 26 conceded by San Antonio. Away from home, Tulsa average 1.56 goals per match and convert 13% of their shots, outperforming San Antonio’s 1.27 goals and 9% conversion rate at home. However, the hosts can rely on greater possession, averaging 54% compared with their opponents’ 42%, as well as a higher home xG of 1.57 versus the visitors’ 1.43. Home advantage limits the size of Tulsa’s edge, but their stronger recent form and significantly more reliable defense point to a Tulsa victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to San Antonio’s highly solid defence, which keeps a clean sheet in 58% of matches and concedes just 0.58 goals per game on average. The hosts also have a low season rate of matches with both teams scoring, at 25%, well below the 53% league-wide figure. Tulsa averages 1.56 goals and 4.67 shots on target per match, but BTTS has landed in only 20% of their last five fixtures, with the team conceding just 3 goals in total. San Antonio averages only 1.00 goal, fails to score in 33% of matches, and its xG of 1.23 does not provide a clear advantage over the opponent’s xG against a 1.37 goal-concession rate. The most likely scenario is therefore that at least one team will fail to score, especially with another home clean sheet or limited San Antonio attacking efficiency both possible.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to approximately 2.41 goals: the hosts average 1.23 xG, while the visitors average 1.43 xG, with San Antonio conceding just 0.58 goals per game at home. The hosts’ defence has kept a clean sheet in 58% of matches, limiting Tulsa’s attacking potential despite their average of 1.56 goals scored. San Antonio have recorded Under 3.5 goals in 92% of their matches this season, compared with 67% for Tulsa, while Over 3.5 goals has occurred in only 8% and 33% of matches, respectively. San Antonio’s last five outings have been slightly more open, with 60% of matches finishing Over 2.5 goals; however, Tulsa conceded just 0.6 goals per game during this period, and only 20% of their matches went Over 2.5 goals. Therefore, the strongest option remains Under 3.5 goals, as the data for both teams clearly points more often to a match ending with a maximum of three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as San Antonio were level at the break in 58% of their matches, compared with 33% for Tulsa. The hosts concede just 0.08 goals per match before half-time and kept a clean sheet in the first half in 92% of their appearances, which significantly limits the visitors’ chances of taking an early lead. San Antonio score only 0.50 goals per match before the break, while Tulsa concede 0.56 during this period, so an early lead for the hosts is also not the most likely outcome. After half-time, Tulsa show greater attacking potential, scoring an average of 1.00 goals compared with San Antonio’s 0.50, but the hosts concede just 0.58 goals per match over the course of the season and have kept clean sheets in 58% of their games. The balance at full-time is also supported by similar xG figures: 1.23 for San Antonio and 1.43 for Tulsa, with both teams recording a drawn full-time result in approximately one quarter of their matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| San Antonio | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.4 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Antonio scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while San Antonio keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - San Antonio
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Antonio is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / match - San Antonio · 1.5 pts / match - Tulsa Roughnecks
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
San Antonio - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
San Antonio
Tulsa Roughnecks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| San Antonio | Liga | Tulsa Roughnecks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.79 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 52% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 26% | ▲ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 80% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): San Antonio 0 - 2 - 3 Tulsa Roughnecks. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
The USL Championship match finished San Antonio 0:0 Tulsa Roughnecks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between San Antonio and Tulsa Roughnecks?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches San Antonio won 0, Tulsa Roughnecks won 3 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
San Antonio score 1.31 goals per game on average and Tulsa Roughnecks 1.29. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of San Antonio's matches and 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's.
What form are San Antonio and Tulsa Roughnecks in?
Over the last 5 games San Antonio have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Tulsa Roughnecks 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Antonio vs Tulsa Roughnecks: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


