San Diego vs Minnesota United: match statistics
San Diego vs Minnesota United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
San Diego played Minnesota United in MLS (United States). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
San Diego: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Minnesota United: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
San Diego scores 2.17 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Minnesota United scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: San Diego 33%, Minnesota United 50%. Over 2.5: San Diego 67%, Minnesota United 67%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Minnesota United has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.20. San Diego: 9.8 shots per match, Minnesota United: 11.0.
Match halves
San Diego: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.00. Minnesota United: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
San Diego: 46-60 (5 goals). Minnesota United: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
San Diego holds a clear advantage in home metrics: at home they average 3.0 goals scored per match, concede only 0.67 goals and keep a clean sheet in 67% of games, whereas Minnesota on the road average 1.25 goals scored and have not recorded a single clean sheet away. The gap in chance creation is significant — San Diego records 6.33 shots on target and 11.67 total shots per match with 64% possession, while Minnesota manage 3.75 shots on target and 10.5 total shots with 44% possession on the road. San Diego also demonstrates superior finishing: the home side’s conversion rate is 26% with home xG 1.4, translating into an actual 3.0 goals per match, whereas Minnesota have a 12% conversion, away xG 1.23 and concede on average 3.0 goals per match (xG against 1.8). In the last 5 matches San Diego have scored 8 goals and hold a 1-2-2 record averaging 1.0 point per match, while Minnesota have 4 goals in their last 5 and a 2-1-2 record averaging 1.4 points per match; despite the visitors’ slightly better points average, the defensive and chance-quality discrepancy favors the hosts. Given San Diego’s advantage in generating and converting chances and Minnesota’s very weak away defense, I forecast a San Diego victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data support BTTS: Minnesota has a seasonal BTTS of 75% and averages 1.25 goals away, while San Diego concedes an average of 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches (14 conceded). xG also favors both-teams-to-score — San Diego has xG_for 1.26 versus Minnesota's xG_against_away 1.80, and Minnesota has xG_for 1.23 versus San Diego's xG_against_home 1.48, indicating chance creation by both sides. Counterarguments are San Diego’s seasonal home stats: seasonal clean sheets 100% and seasonal BTTS_home 0% (sezonConcededAVG_home=0.0), but this conflicts with form (last5 BTTS 60% and 8 goals scored and 14 conceded in five). Given Minnesota’s strong signal (75% away BTTS), clear recent xG on both sides and San Diego’s high level of concessions, I tip BTTS = Yes (70%) vs No (30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining xG and defensive values estimates xG of 1.53 for San Diego (attack xG 1.26 and Minnesota defensive xG 1.80) and 1.36 for Minnesota (attack xG 1.23 and San Diego defensive xG 1.48), yielding a total of 2.89 expected goals. Using a Poisson distribution with λ=2.89 I estimate Over 1.5 has approximately a 78% chance (more than 1 goal), Over 2.5 about 55% (more than 2 goals), and Over 3.5 around 33% (4+ goals). Additionally, San Diego averages 12 shots and 4 on target per game, Minnesota 10.5 shots and 3.75 on target; despite a higher shot volume San Diego has a lower conversion rate of 4% versus Minnesota’s 12%, which may limit its finishing but does not eliminate goal potential. In the last 5 matches San Diego averaged 1.6 goals for and 2.8 against, Minnesota 0.8 scored and 2.0 conceded; San Diego had 100% of matches over 2.5 goals in the last 5, Minnesota 60%, indicating a propensity for high-scoring games. Consequently, the strongest and least risky signal is Over 1.5 (over) with an estimated probability of ~78%; Over 2.5 remains a moderate option (~55%), while Over 3.5 is less justified (~33%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is that the home side were drawing at the break in 2 of 2 home matches (drawingAtHT_home = 2.0, 100%) and themselves did not score by half-time (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0), indicating a high likelihood of a draw at half-time. In the second half the hosts average 0.5 goals (scored_2hg_avg_home = 0.5, AVG_2hg_home = 0.5), while the visitors concede an average of 1.25 goals after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_away = 1.25), so a home goal after the break is expected. The home team have better match parameters (seasonPPG_home = 2.0 vs seasonPPG_away = 1.0) and at home win 50% of matches with 0% losses (winPercentage_home = 50.0, losePercentage_home = 0.0), which favors them for the Full-Time victory. xG are similar (1.26 for San Diego vs 1.23 for Minnesota), but the visitors have worse defense in expected goals against (xg_against_avg_away = 1.8 vs xg_against_avg_home = 1.48) and a seasonal BTTS of 75% (seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 75.0), which further suggests the Half-Time draw will turn into a home win by Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| San Diego | Minnesota United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
San Diego is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - San Diego · 1.4 pts / match - Minnesota United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
San Diego is 117% better for: goals scored per match.
2.17 goals / match - San Diego · 1 goals / match - Minnesota United
San Diego is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - San Diego · 2 goals / match - Minnesota United
San Diego scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
Minnesota United scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while San Diego keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - San Diego
Over / Under - Minnesota United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
San Diego is 224% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.17 pts / match - San Diego · 0.67 pts / match - Minnesota United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
San Diego - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 50%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Minnesota United - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
San Diego
Minnesota United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| San Diego | Liga | Minnesota United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 3.11 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 25% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 82% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of San Diego vs Minnesota United?
The MLS match finished San Diego 1:2 Minnesota United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before San Diego vs Minnesota United?
San Diego score 2.17 goals per game on average and Minnesota United 1.00. The MLS average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 33% of San Diego's matches and 50% of Minnesota United's.
What form are San Diego and Minnesota United in?
Over the last 5 games San Diego have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Minnesota United 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Diego vs Minnesota United?
The statistical background for San Diego vs Minnesota United — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


