United States - MLSSnapdragon StadiumData current as of 18 September 2026

San Diego vs Philadelphia Union: match statistics

San Diego crest
San Diego
0 : 5half-time 0:1
Philadelphia Union crest
Philadelphia Union

San Diego vs Philadelphia Union: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Diego played Philadelphia Union in MLS (United States). The match was played on 14 September 2026. Venue: Snapdragon Stadium. Final score: 0:5.

Current form

San Diego: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Philadelphia Union: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Diego scores 1.75 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. Philadelphia Union scores 1.71 and concedes 1.63. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Diego 54%, Philadelphia Union 67%. Over 2.5: San Diego 63%, Philadelphia Union 63%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

Philadelphia Union has higher xG: 1.82 vs 1.40. San Diego: 12.0 shots per match, Philadelphia Union: 16.4.

Match halves

San Diego: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.92. Philadelphia Union: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

San Diego: 46-60 (9 goals). Philadelphia Union: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Diego has a clearly stronger home profile: they win 50% of their matches, average 2.50 goals scored, and have not lost a single game without finding the net. Philadelphia Union arrive in good form, remaining unbeaten in their last five matches (3 wins and 2 draws) while scoring 11 goals during that period. However, the visitors’ away performances are a concern: they lose 58% of such matches, concede an average of 2.33 goals, and have kept a clean sheet in 0% of games. The hosts are more clinical, converting 18% of their shots into goals compared with Philadelphia’s 12%, while also averaging 60% possession against 45% for their opponents. Although the visitors’ away xG stands at a solid 1.67 compared with San Diego’s 1.57 at home, the hosts’ superior finishing and Philadelphia’s significantly weaker away defense point towards a San Diego win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Philadelphia Union have a very high seasonal rate of matches in which both teams score, standing at 83%, while San Diego record 50%, compared with the league average of 63%. The visitors score an average of 1.83 goals per match, and their attacking potential is supported by an xG of 1.67; additionally, San Diego allow opponents just 0.85 xG, which slightly reduces confidence in a Philadelphia goal. The key argument for BTTS - Yes is Union’s poor seasonal away defensive record, conceding an average of 2.33 goals and keeping no clean sheets, while San Diego produce an average of 1.97 xG and register 5.33 shots on target. In their last five matches, Philadelphia have scored 13 goals, or 2.6 per match, while San Diego have averaged 1.6 goals, giving both teams a realistic basis for finding the net. Although the visitors’ current defensive form has improved to 0.8 goals conceded per match across their last five appearances, the overall season profile more strongly supports a Goal/Goal scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals, as Philadelphia’s matches have exceeded this line in 92% of cases, compared with 67% for San Diego. Philadelphia averages 1.83 goals per match, while its away defense concedes as many as 2.33 goals, clearly favoring the hosts’ attacking output. At home, San Diego creates chances worth an average of 1.97 xG while conceding just 0.85 xG, but Philadelphia has scored 13 goals in its last five matches, averaging 2.6 per game. Both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in 3 of their last 5 matches; however, the visitors’ strong current defensive record, conceding only 0.8 goals per match during this period, limits confidence in higher lines. The projection of 3.05 goals indicates a realistic chance of Over 2.5, but Over 1.5 remains by far the safest statistical edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

San Diego has a clearly superior overall season record: they score an average of 1.58 goals and concede just 0.92, while Philadelphia, despite scoring 1.83 goals per match, allows opponents to score as many as 2.33. The hosts also create more high-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.97 compared with Philadelphia’s 1.67, while their defence restricts opponents to 0.85 xG, versus 1.27 for Philadelphia. At half-time, San Diego most frequently found themselves level, doing so in 50% of matches, whereas Philadelphia were trailing at the break in as many as 58% of games and conceded an average of 1.25 goals during the opening 45 minutes. After the interval, the hosts are particularly solid, scoring an average of 1.08 goals, conceding just 0.33, and winning the second half in 50% of matches. The most likely scenario is therefore San Diego leading at the break and maintaining their advantage through to full-time, although the visitors’ strong recent run reduces confidence in this outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 4
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
10Shots21
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
5Shots on target5
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.39xG1.98
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
11Corners4
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
56Dangerous attacks43
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
13Fouls15
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
2Cards2
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.75Goals scored / match1.71
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.54Goals conceded / match1.63
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
60%Average possession47%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
4.54Shots on target / match5
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.96Shots per match16.42
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
4.54Shots on target5
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
14.6%Shot conversion10.4%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
60%Possession47%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.4xG for1.82
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.44xG against1.06
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

Shooting quality

San Diego: Efficient finishingPhiladelphia Union: Attacking
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
Accuracy (shots on target)38%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Philadelphia Union is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - San Diego · 2.2 pts / match - Philadelphia Union

San Diego
LWWLL
Season result split
33% W25% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-10
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Philadelphia Union
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
33% W25% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-10
1.25 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Diego is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.54 goals / match - San Diego · 1.63 goals / match - Philadelphia Union

San Diego scoring profile: very strong

San Diego scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: very strong

Philadelphia Union scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while San Diego keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

42Goals scored (season)41
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
37Goals conceded (season)39
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
3.29Average goals in match3.33
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
9Goals scored (last 5)13
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal79%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
50%2 goals46%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
25%3 goals33%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
8%4 goals8%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal79%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
46%2 goals50%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
29%3 goals17%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
8%4 goals8%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 24 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time21%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
13%BTTS in both halves0%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
46%Scored in both halves21%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
60%BTTS - last 560%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Diego is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - San Diego · 0.96 pts / match - Philadelphia Union

San Diego - half-time state
38% leading29% draw33% trailing
Philadelphia Union - half-time state
21% leading33% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)0.96
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.58
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
0.92Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.75Average goals (1st half)1.5
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
46%Clean sheet before half-time38%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
33%No goal before half-time58%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per match (2nd half)1.58
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
1.54Average goals (2nd half)1.83
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
58%Clean sheet after half-time54%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union
38%No goal after half-time42%
San DiegoPhiladelphia Union

San Diego - second-half results

42% W33% D25% L
34
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

42% W33% D25% L
23
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Diego - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Philadelphia Union - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match1.01.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Diego
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
5
5
16-30
8
9
31-45
9
4
46-60
6
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
11
16-30
7
7
31-45
9
4
46-60
10
6
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.31
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Diego

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.95
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

San DiegoLigaPhiladelphia Union
Average goals in match 3.293.19 3.33
Both teams scored 54%63% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%62% 63%
Clean sheets 29%21% 21%
Goal before half-time 88%77% 83%
Goal after half-time 79%81% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardBruno Damiani
  2. San DiegoYellow cardAlejandro Alvarado Jr.
  3. Philadelphia UnionGoalCavan SullivanAssist: Indiana Vassilev
  4. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardNeil Pierre
  5. Philadelphia UnionGoalCavan SullivanAssist: Indiana Vassilev
  6. Philadelphia UnionGoalBruno DamianiAssist: Francis Westfield
  7. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Quinn SullivanOff: Indiana Vassilev
  8. San DiegoSubstitutionOn: Bi Voli ZambléOff: Mohamed Elias Achouri
  9. San DiegoSubstitutionOn: Dag­ur Dan Þór­halls­sonOff: Ian Murphy
  10. San DiegoYellow cardOscar Verhoeven
  11. Philadelphia UnionGoalMalik Jakupovic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of San Diego vs Philadelphia Union?

The MLS match finished San Diego 0:5 Philadelphia Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before San Diego vs Philadelphia Union?

San Diego score 1.75 goals per game on average and Philadelphia Union 1.71. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 54% of San Diego's matches and 67% of Philadelphia Union's.

What form are San Diego and Philadelphia Union in?

Over the last 5 games San Diego have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Philadelphia Union 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Diego vs Philadelphia Union?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.