United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 23 July 2026

San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance: match statistics

San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Jose Earthquakes II play Tacoma Defiance in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 12 July 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

San Jose Earthquakes II: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Tacoma Defiance: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.18 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. Tacoma Defiance scores 1.21 and concedes 1.37. League average: 3.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Jose Earthquakes II 65%, Tacoma Defiance 42%. Over 2.5: San Jose Earthquakes II 65%, Tacoma Defiance 53%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

San Jose Earthquakes II has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.36. San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.5 shots per match, Tacoma Defiance: 11.7.

Match halves

San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 53%, second-half goals 0.94. Tacoma Defiance: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (10 goals). Tacoma Defiance: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.23 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 0-2-2. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.

Match description

San Jose Earthquakes II are the clear favorites: at home they score an average of 3.33 goals per game with 5.67 shots on target and a conversion rate of 27%. Their home defense concedes just 0.67 goals per game on average and they keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, while Tacoma Defiance concede 2.0 goals per away match and keep a clean sheet in only 14% of games. The difference in quality of chances is also visible in xG: San Jose averages 1.5 xG at home versus 1.33 xG for the visitors, yet the hosts actually convert those chances into 3.33 goals, while Tacoma manage only 1.0 goals on the road. Form reinforces the advantage – San Jose earns 2.0 points per game over the last 5 matches (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), Tacoma just 1.4 points (2 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses); additionally the visitors failed to score in 43% of away fixtures versus 17% for the hosts. Considering the higher conversion rate (27% vs 9%), superior home goal difference (+16 vs -7 away) and markedly better defensive efficiency, I predict a home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
13Shots13
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
5Shots on target3
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.68xG1.38
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
4Corners4
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
69Dangerous attacks48
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
13Fouls13
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1Cards2
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
2.18Goals scored / match1.21
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.18Goals conceded / match1.37
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
51%Average possession45%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
5.06Shots on target / match3.95
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.53Shots per match11.68
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
5.06Shots on target3.95
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
16.1%Shot conversion10.4%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
51%Possession45%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.63xG for1.36
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.56xG against1.54
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Shooting quality

San Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishingTacoma Defiance: Balanced
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tacoma Defiance is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 2 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II
LWWLL
Season result split
47% W18% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-6
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tacoma Defiance
WDLWW
Season result split
37% W21% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-8
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-4
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

2.18 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 1.21 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 1.37 goals / match - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: very strong

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Tacoma Defiance keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).

Tacoma Defiance scoring profile: very strong

Tacoma Defiance scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

37Goals scored (season)23
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
20Goals conceded (season)26
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
3.35Average goals in match2.58
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
11Goals scored (last 5)8
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal63%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
53%2 goals37%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
41%3 goals11%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
24%4 goals11%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal74%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
29%2 goals47%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
6%3 goals11%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0%4 goals5%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

65%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 17 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time21%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
12%BTTS in both halves16%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
41%Scored in both halves21%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
60%BTTS - last 540%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II · 1.05 pts / match - Tacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
53% leading41% draw6% trailing
Tacoma Defiance - half-time state
16% leading58% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per match (1st half)1.05
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.24Goals scored (1st half)0.42
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.59Average goals (1st half)0.95
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
65%Clean sheet before half-time53%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
29%No goal before half-time74%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.42
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.84
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.63
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
41%Clean sheet after half-time42%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance
53%No goal after half-time42%
San Jose Earthquakes IITacoma Defiance

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

35% W18% R47% P
34
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 53% of matches and wins 47%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tacoma Defiance - second-half results

37% W32% R32% P
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding231%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Tacoma Defiance - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
10
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
6
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tacoma Defiance
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
9
2
46-60
2
8
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Tacoma Defiance

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

San Jose Earthquakes IILigaTacoma Defiance
Average goals in match 3.353.23 2.58
Both teams scored 65%61% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%65% 53%
Clean sheets 18%22% 26%
Goal before half-time 76%75% 53%
Goal after half-time 82%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): San Jose Earthquakes II 0 - 2 - 2 Tacoma Defiance. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Tacoma Defiance
0 : 0
San Jose Earthquakes II
San Jose Earthquakes II
0 : 1
Tacoma Defiance
Tacoma Defiance
4 : 4
San Jose Earthquakes II
Tacoma Defiance
3 : 1
San Jose Earthquakes II

FAQ

What was the result of San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance?

The MLS Next Pro match finished San Jose Earthquakes II 0:1 Tacoma Defiance. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between San Jose Earthquakes II and Tacoma Defiance?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches San Jose Earthquakes II won 0, Tacoma Defiance won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance?

San Jose Earthquakes II score 2.18 goals per game on average and Tacoma Defiance 1.21. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 65% of San Jose Earthquakes II's matches and 42% of Tacoma Defiance's.

What form are San Jose Earthquakes II and Tacoma Defiance in?

Over the last 5 games San Jose Earthquakes II have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Tacoma Defiance 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Jose Earthquakes II vs Tacoma Defiance?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.