Argentina - Prim B NacionalEstadio Ingeniero Hilario SánchezData current as of 08 September 2026

San Martín Tucumán vs Quilmes: match statistics

San Martín Tucumán crest
San Martín Tucumán
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Quilmes crest
Quilmes

San Martín Tucumán vs Quilmes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Martín Tucumán played Quilmes in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 7 June 2026. Venue: Estadio Ingeniero Hilario Sánchez. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

San Martín Tucumán: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Quilmes: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Martín Tucumán scores 0.93 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Quilmes scores 0.93 and concedes 0.73. League average: 1.83 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Martín Tucumán 33%, Quilmes 20%. Over 2.5: San Martín Tucumán 13%, Quilmes 33%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Quilmes has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.32. San Martín Tucumán: 10.0 shots per match, Quilmes: 10.2.

Match halves

San Martín Tucumán: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47. Quilmes: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

San Martín Tucumán: 76-90+ (4 goals). Quilmes: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.83 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Martín Tucumán holds a clear advantage in home metrics: on average 1.13 goals scored and only 0.63 conceded per home match, with home xG 1.41 versus Quilmes’ 1.26 xG in away games. The hosts control the game (57% possession) and average 11 shots per match with 3.63 on target, while the visitors register 45% possession and 9.5 shots (3.38 on target), which limits their volume of high-quality chances. Quilmes has a significant offensive problem away from home — failing to score in 63% of away fixtures and suffering defeats in 63% of their away matches (only 13% wins), conceding on average 1.13 goals on the road. Recent form points are similar (San Martín 0.8 pts in the last 5, Quilmes 1.0 pts), but a higher rate of clean sheets for the hosts (50% vs 25%) and superior xG/possession favor a San Martín victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show low BTTS rates this season: San Martín 14% and Quilmes 25%, with BTTS at 20% for both sides over the last 5 matches. The home side is very solid defensively — San Martín has a 71% clean sheet rate and concedes only 0.29 goals per match on average (12 conceded vs 14 scored), while Quilmes averages 0.88 goals scored and 1.13 conceded per match. xG metrics indicate some chances (San Martín 1.43 xG vs 1.34 xG conceded, Quilmes 1.26 xG vs 1.39 xG conceded), but actual goal averages are low (1.0 and 0.88 in the season, and both teams 0.6 goals in the last 5 matches) and shot conversion is only 9% for both. Additionally, the league BTTS sits at 39% with a very high clean sheet rate of 79%, which combined with the home 71% clean sheets increases the likelihood that at least one team will fail to score. For these reasons I back No Goal (BTTS - No) with strong data support — assigning it an 80% probability versus 20% for BTTS - Yes, because the low seasonal BTTS (14%/25%), high clean sheet rates and low real goal output (0.6 in the last 5 matches) argue against both teams scoring.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model combines home xG 1.43 with away-xG conceded 1.39, giving San Martín ≈1.41 goals, while combining Quilmes xG 1.26 with home-xG conceded 1.34 gives Quilmes ≈1.30, totaling ≈2.71 goals. However, the hosts’ actual defensive stats are very strong: San Martín concedes only 0.29 goals per game on average and has 71% clean sheets, and only 14% of home matches end with both teams scoring. Historical over2.5 rates are 29% for the hosts and 38% for Quilmes (league 28%), and in the last 5 matches both teams have scored 3 goals each (0.6 per team, 1.2 combined on average), indicating low scoring form. Both sides still generate chances (home average 11 shots and 3.57 on target, visitors 9.5 and 3.38), which explains the xG 2.71, but low conversion (9.0% for both) and the hosts’ high clean sheet rate reduce the likelihood of many goals. Consequently, the strongest signal from the data is under 2.5 (I assess 65%), with a concurrently high probability of over1.5 (70%) and low for over3.5 (12%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

San Martín Tucumán holds a clear advantage in home statistics: on average 1.00 goal per game with xG 1.43 and only 0.29 conceded per game this season, scoring 0.57 and conceding 0.14 by half-time and leading at the break in 3 of 7 matches (43%). Quilmes posts weaker figures — 0.88 goals per game, xG 1.26 and 1.13 conceded on average, 0.38 scored and 0.50 conceded by half-time and they led at the break only once (13%). The hosts record 71% of matches with a clean sheet this season and as many as 86% of clean halves at half-time, whereas Quilmes has only 25% of matches without conceding, suggesting greater defensive resilience from San Martín in the first half. Additionally, San Martín averages 11.0 shots versus Quilmes’ 9.5 and has a better home points return (1.71 PPG vs. the visitors’ 0.63 PPG), which points toward a scenario of the hosts maintaining the lead. Therefore I assign the highest probability to HT/FT 1/1 (30%), followed by x/x (24%) and x/1 (11%), while options with the visitors leading at the break sum to about 14%, consistent with their low frequency of leads (13%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
7Shots2
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
1Shots on target0
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.78xG0.46
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
4Corners3
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
34Dangerous attacks43
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
1Fouls0
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
2Cards3
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.93Goals scored / match0.93
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.8Goals conceded / match0.73
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
55%Average possession46%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
3.67Shots on target / match3.47
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match10.2
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
3.67Shots on target3.47
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
9.3%Shot conversion9.2%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
55%Possession46%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
1.32xG for1.34
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.93xG against1.36
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

Shooting quality

San Martín Tucumán: BalancedQuilmes: Balanced
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

San Martín Tucumán is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - San Martín Tucumán · 1 pts / match - Quilmes

San Martín Tucumán
WWLLL
Season result split
33% W40% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-4
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Quilmes
DLLDW
Season result split
27% W33% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-6
1.13 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Quilmes is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - San Martín Tucumán · 0.73 goals / match - Quilmes

San Martín Tucumán scoring profile: mixed

San Martín Tucumán scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Quilmes keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).

Quilmes scoring profile: mixed

Quilmes scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while San Martín Tucumán keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

14Goals scored (season)14
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
12Goals conceded (season)11
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
1.73Average goals in match1.67
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
4Goals scored (last 5)3
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal40%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
33%2 goals33%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%3 goals20%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%4 goals0%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal53%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
20%2 goals13%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%3 goals7%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%4 goals0%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
San Martín Tucumán - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 15 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time7%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%BTTS in both halves7%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
13%Scored in both halves33%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
20%BTTS - last 520%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time53%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
13%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Martín Tucumán - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing
Quilmes - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)1.27
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.47
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.8
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
60%Clean sheet before half-time73%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
60%No goal before half-time67%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.33
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
0.8Average goals (2nd half)0.87
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
67%Clean sheet after half-time67%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes
67%No goal after half-time60%
San Martín TucumánQuilmes

San Martín Tucumán - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Quilmes - second-half results

27% W53% R20% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Martín Tucumán - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Quilmes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Martín Tucumán
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Quilmes
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
0
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
24%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
24%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Martín Tucumán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Quilmes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

San Martín TucumánLigaQuilmes
Average goals in match 1.731.83 1.67
Both teams scored 33%38% 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%28% 33%
Clean sheets 40%40% 47%
Goal before half-time 67%55% 53%
Goal after half-time 67%69% 53%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.83
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
0.73
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. San Martín TucumánYellow cardElías Sebastián López
  2. QuilmesYellow cardThomas Sebastián Ortega
  3. QuilmesYellow cardJuan Yangali
  4. San Martín TucumánYellow cardNicolás Agustín Ferreyra
  5. QuilmesSubstitutionOn: Alexis Domínguez AnsorenaOff: Aarón Spetale
  6. QuilmesYellow cardAlexis Domínguez Ansorena
  7. QuilmesSubstitutionOn: Mauro Raúl FernándezOff: Ulises Vera
  8. San Martín TucumánSubstitutionOn: Benjamín BorasiOff: Luca Arfaras

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): San Martín Tucumán 1 - 1 - 0 Quilmes. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

CA San Martín de Tucumán
1 : 1
Quilmes AC
Quilmes AC
1 : 2
CA San Martín de Tucumán

FAQ

What was the result of San Martín Tucumán vs Quilmes?

The Prim B Nacional match finished San Martín Tucumán 0:0 Quilmes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between San Martín Tucumán and Quilmes?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches San Martín Tucumán won 1, Quilmes won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before San Martín Tucumán vs Quilmes?

San Martín Tucumán score 0.93 goals per game on average and Quilmes 0.93. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 33% of San Martín Tucumán's matches and 20% of Quilmes's.

What form are San Martín Tucumán and Quilmes in?

Over the last 5 games San Martín Tucumán have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Quilmes 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Martín Tucumán vs Quilmes?

The statistical background for San Martín Tucumán vs Quilmes — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.