Argentina - Prim B NacionalEstadio Dr. Osvaldo Francisco BalettoData current as of 06 September 2026

San Telmo vs Chaco For Ever: match statistics

San Telmo crest
San Telmo
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Chaco For Ever crest
Chaco For Ever

San Telmo vs Chaco For Ever: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Telmo played Chaco For Ever in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Venue: Estadio Dr. Osvaldo Francisco Baletto. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

San Telmo: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chaco For Ever: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Telmo scores 0.79 and concedes 0.95 goals per match. Chaco For Ever scores 0.74 and concedes 1.32. League average: 1.87 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Telmo 32%, Chaco For Ever 47%. Over 2.5: San Telmo 26%, Chaco For Ever 26%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

San Telmo has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.17. San Telmo: 9.7 shots per match, Chaco For Ever: 9.4.

Match halves

San Telmo: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.32. Chaco For Ever: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.53.

Goals by minute

San Telmo: 0-15 (4 goals). Chaco For Ever: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.87 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Telmo holds a clear advantage in quality of chances: at home their average xG is 1.72 with 12.9 shots and 4.6 shots on target, while Chaco For Ever away posts xG 0.98, 7.89 shots and only 2.11 shots on target. The difference in efficiency is pronounced: San Telmo converts roughly 8% of shots into goals at home, averaging 1.00 goal per game, whereas the visitors have about 4% conversion away and score only 0.33 goals per game, with Chaco failing to score in 78% of their away matches. Defensively the hosts also perform better: San Telmo concedes 1.00 goal in home matches and kept a clean sheet in 50% of home games, while Chaco concedes 1.44 goals away and has just 22% clean sheets; over the season Chaco conceded 25 goals versus 18 conceded by San Telmo. Although both teams have a similar points return in the last five matches (around 1 point per game), in those five matches San Telmo scored 3 and conceded 3, while Chaco scored 4 and conceded 6, indicating greater instability in the visitors’ defense. Given San Telmo’s advantages in xG (1.72 vs 0.98), shots on target (4.6 vs 2.11) and the visitors’ lack of away wins (0% away victories), I back the home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against BTTS is Chaco For Ever: away they average only 0.33 goals scored and failed to score in 78% of away matches, with a shot conversion of just 4% and on average 7.89 shots and 2.11 on target. San Telmo at home has a season BTTS rate of 70% and xG of 1.34, with an average of 10.8 shots and 2.9 on target, which means the hosts create chances, but their last 5 matches show only 20% BTTS and an average of 0.6 scored and 0.6 conceded goals. xG comparison shows: San Telmo generates 1.34 xG, while opponents away against Chaco average 1.26 xG; simultaneously Chaco posts 0.98 xG per match but a very low 4% conversion, so the visitors’ xG rarely translates into actual goals. Given Chaco’s seasonal 78% of matches without a goal, San Telmo’s recent 20% BTTS and a low league average goals of 1.87, a both teams not to score scenario is more likely — I assess 'No' at 70% and 'Yes' at 30%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG calculations give expected goals of 1.30 for San Telmo (home xG 1.34 vs xG conceded to Chaco 1.26) and 1.04 for Chaco For Ever (away xG 0.98 vs xG conceded to San Telmo 1.10), totaling 2.34 goals. San Telmo averages 10.8 shots and 2.9 on target with a 10% conversion, while Chaco records 7.89 shots, 2.11 on target and 4% conversion, indicating greater attacking potential for the home side. Seasonal percentages confirm San Telmo exceed 1.5 goals in 80% of matches and Chaco in 67%, whereas Over 2.5 occurs less often (40% vs 11%). A Poisson model with mean 2.34 yields probabilities of >1.5 ≈68%, >2.5 ≈41% and >3.5 ≈21%. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — expected 2.34 goals combined, low clean sheet rates (San Telmo 20%, Chaco 22%) and average goals conceded of 1.2 and 1.44 increase the likelihood of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I project a draw, as the home side average only 0.3 goals in the first half, the visitors 0.11, and the home team’s average first-half goals is 0.9; additionally, the home team record a 40% draw rate at the break and the visitors 44%, which increases the likelihood of a level score after 45 minutes. However, after the interval the home advantage becomes apparent: the home side average 0.8 goals in second halves versus 0.22 for the visitors, overall second-half averages are 1.4 versus 1.0, and the home team have scored at least once after the break in 100% of analysed matches. This is supported by xG and chance quality – home xG 1.34 versus 0.98 for the opponents, on average 2.9 shots on target versus 2.11 and a conversion rate of 10% compared to 4%, so with similar opportunities the home side convert more often. Additionally, the home team earn 1.0 point per home match versus 0.33 points for the visitors and have a 20% win rate compared to 0% for away wins, which increases the chance of a San Telmo victory after an even first half. Based on this, the strongest signal is a half-time draw and a home win at full-time (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
San TelmoChaco For Ever
9Shots9
San TelmoChaco For Ever
1Shots on target3
San TelmoChaco For Ever
1.28xG1.2
San TelmoChaco For Ever
4Corners4
San TelmoChaco For Ever
87Dangerous attacks57
San TelmoChaco For Ever
10Fouls6
San TelmoChaco For Ever
2Cards3
San TelmoChaco For Ever

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.79Goals scored / match0.74
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.95Goals conceded / match1.32
San TelmoChaco For Ever
50%Average possession51%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
3.26Shots on target / match2.53
San TelmoChaco For Ever

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.68Shots per match9.42
San TelmoChaco For Ever
3.26Shots on target2.53
San TelmoChaco For Ever
8.2%Shot conversion7.8%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
50%Possession51%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
1.31xG for1.17
San TelmoChaco For Ever
1.57xG against1.18
San TelmoChaco For Ever

Shooting quality

San Telmo: BalancedChaco For Ever: Balanced
San TelmoChaco For Ever
Accuracy (shots on target)34%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

San Telmo
LDDWL
Season result split
21% W42% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-8-7
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Chaco For Ever
DLLWD
Season result split
11% W37% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-7-10
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-6
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Telmo is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - San Telmo · 0.74 goals / match - Chaco For Ever

San Telmo is 39% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.95 goals / match - San Telmo · 1.32 goals / match - Chaco For Ever

San Telmo scoring profile: strong

San Telmo scores in 47% of matches (9 of 19 matches), while Chaco For Ever keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).

Chaco For Ever scoring profile: mixed

Chaco For Ever scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while San Telmo keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 matches).

15Goals scored (season)14
San TelmoChaco For Ever
18Goals conceded (season)25
San TelmoChaco For Ever
1.74Average goals in match2.05
San TelmoChaco For Ever
3Goals scored (last 5)4
San TelmoChaco For Ever
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
San TelmoChaco For Ever

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal58%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
26%2 goals16%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
5%3 goals0%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0%4 goals0%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

How often they concede at least...

58%1 goal79%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
26%2 goals47%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
11%3 goals5%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0%4 goals0%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

40%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time11%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0%BTTS in both halves5%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
11%Scored in both halves11%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
20%BTTS - last 560%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

58%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

2nd half

58%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
5%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Telmo is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / match - San Telmo · 0.74 pts / match - Chaco For Ever

San Telmo - half-time state
21% leading53% draw26% trailing
Chaco For Ever - half-time state
11% leading42% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per match (1st half)0.74
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.21
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
San TelmoChaco For Ever
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.84
San TelmoChaco For Ever
58%Clean sheet before half-time53%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
68%No goal before half-time79%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.16
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.32Goals scored (2nd half)0.53
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.37Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
San TelmoChaco For Ever
0.68Average goals (2nd half)1.21
San TelmoChaco For Ever
63%Clean sheet after half-time42%
San TelmoChaco For Ever
74%No goal after half-time53%
San TelmoChaco For Ever

San Telmo - second-half results

26% W42% R32% P
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chaco For Ever - second-half results

32% W21% R47% P
14
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.74
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

San Telmo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.00.2
1 goal60%20%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Chaco For Ever - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Telmo
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Chaco For Ever
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
0
4
31-45
2
7
46-60
4
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Telmo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Chaco For Ever

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.57
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

San TelmoLigaChaco For Ever
Average goals in match 1.741.87 2.05
Both teams scored 32%40% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%30% 26%
Clean sheets 42%39% 21%
Goal before half-time 58%56% 58%
Goal after half-time 58%70% 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.87
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+51%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chaco For EverYellow cardBrian Nievas
  2. San TelmoYellow cardLázaro Britez
  3. Chaco For EverYellow cardGastón Canuto
  4. Chaco For EverGoalEnzo GaggiAssist: Matías Sebastián Romero
  5. Chaco For EverYellow cardAlan Luque
  6. Chaco For EverSubstitutionOn: Andrés LioiOff: Leandro David Fernández
  7. San TelmoYellow cardGabriel Paredes
  8. Chaco For EverGoalMatías Sebastián Romero

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): San Telmo 1 - 1 - 1 Chaco For Ever. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Chaco For Ever
2 : 2
San Telmo
CA San Telmo
0 : 2
Club Atlético Chaco For Ever
Club Atlético Chaco For Ever
1 : 2
CA San Telmo

FAQ

What was the result of San Telmo vs Chaco For Ever?

The Prim B Nacional match finished San Telmo 1:3 Chaco For Ever. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between San Telmo and Chaco For Ever?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches San Telmo won 1, Chaco For Ever won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before San Telmo vs Chaco For Ever?

San Telmo score 0.79 goals per game on average and Chaco For Ever 0.74. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 32% of San Telmo's matches and 47% of Chaco For Ever's.

What form are San Telmo and Chaco For Ever in?

Over the last 5 games San Telmo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chaco For Ever 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Telmo vs Chaco For Ever?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Telmo vs Chaco For Ever: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.