Argentina - Prim B NacionalData current as of 12 September 2026

San Telmo vs Quilmes: match statistics

San Telmo crest
San Telmo
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Quilmes crest
Quilmes

San Telmo vs Quilmes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

San Telmo played Quilmes in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

San Telmo: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Quilmes: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

San Telmo scores 1.60 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Quilmes scores 0.60 and concedes 0.60. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: San Telmo 80%, Quilmes 0%. Over 2.5: San Telmo 60%, Quilmes 20%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

San Telmo has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.02. San Telmo: 9.4 shots per match, Quilmes: 8.4.

Match halves

San Telmo: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60. Quilmes: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

San Telmo: 0-15 (2 goals). Quilmes: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Prim B Nacional: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win: San Telmo has an offensive and possession edge. Hosts average 1.67 goals at home with 1.58 xG and 11 shots, while Quilmes have not scored away yet (FTS% 100%), averaging 0 goals and 1.15 xG. Quilmes also show poor away efficiency (2 SOT per match, conversion rate 0) and an away losing run, reducing their chances of points. San Telmo have defensive leaks (avg 2 goals conceded at home), increasing the probability of a draw or a match with goals. Given the home advantage, low visitor efficiency and current form, I assign 60% to the hosts, 30% to a draw and 10% to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Primary signals indicate No Goal/No Goal: San Telmo has 100% home clean sheets this season and home season BTTS 0%, while league CS% is high (76%). Quilmes shows very poor scoring (seasonScoredAVG_away 0.0, last5 avg 0.6) and season BTTS 0%, weakening BTTS probability. Although San Telmo has 80% BTTS in last 5, other metrics (high xG against hosts but actual clean sheets) suggest hosts maintain defensive results at home. Overall form and goal stats favor at least one team failing to score, so I recommend BTTS = NO.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis points to a moderate scoring tempo: home xG 0.82 vs away xG conceded 1.26 gives ~1.04 expected for San Telmo, while Quilmes (1.15 vs 1.33) gives ~1.24. Shot metrics favor the visitors, but the low league average (1.86) and a high percentage of home clean sheets suggest limited scoring. Last5 xG are higher but efficiency and variability temper outcomes, increasing probability of at least two goals. Season Over/Under rates are mixed, but total expected goals ~2.28 strongly supports Over 1.5 as the most secure market. I therefore recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

San Telmo clearly dominates the available stats: high home PPG (2.0), season HT goals average 1.0 vs opponent 0.0, and 50% leads at the break. Quilmes shows poor form with practically no goals this season (seasonScoredAVG_away 0.0) and 0% away wins, reducing their chances in the final result. Additionally San Telmo has 100% season clean sheets at home and first-half goals (0–15 and 31–45), increasing the likelihood of a lead at the break. Considering the league’s low scoring tendency (high CS% 76%) and the home advantage, the most likely scenario is San Telmo leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
San TelmoQuilmes
12Shots13
San TelmoQuilmes
6Shots on target7
San TelmoQuilmes
1.66xG1.83
San TelmoQuilmes
3Corners1
San TelmoQuilmes
66Dangerous attacks71
San TelmoQuilmes
14Fouls14
San TelmoQuilmes
2Cards1
San TelmoQuilmes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match0.6
San TelmoQuilmes
1.8Goals conceded / match0.6
San TelmoQuilmes
55%Average possession44%
San TelmoQuilmes
4.8Shots on target / match2
San TelmoQuilmes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.4Shots per match8.4
San TelmoQuilmes
4.8Shots on target2
San TelmoQuilmes
17%Shot conversion7.1%
San TelmoQuilmes
55%Possession44%
San TelmoQuilmes
1.35xG for1.02
San TelmoQuilmes
1.63xG against1.29
San TelmoQuilmes

Shooting quality

San Telmo: Efficient finishingQuilmes: Balanced
San TelmoQuilmes
Accuracy (shots on target)51%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

San Telmo is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - San Telmo · 0.8 pts / match - Quilmes

San Telmo
LDLDW
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 at home
1-0-2
LLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Quilmes
LDLWL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 away
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Telmo is 167% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - San Telmo · 0.6 goals / match - Quilmes

Quilmes is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - San Telmo · 0.6 goals / match - Quilmes

San Telmo scoring profile: strong

San Telmo scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Quilmes keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Quilmes scoring profile: mixed

Quilmes scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while San Telmo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)3
San TelmoQuilmes
9Goals conceded (season)3
San TelmoQuilmes
3.4Average goals in match1.2
San TelmoQuilmes
8Goals scored (last 5)3
San TelmoQuilmes
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
San TelmoQuilmes

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal20%
San TelmoQuilmes
60%2 goals20%
San TelmoQuilmes
20%3 goals20%
San TelmoQuilmes
0%4 goals0%
San TelmoQuilmes

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal60%
San TelmoQuilmes
60%2 goals0%
San TelmoQuilmes
20%3 goals0%
San TelmoQuilmes
0%4 goals0%
San TelmoQuilmes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time0%
San TelmoQuilmes
0%BTTS in both halves0%
San TelmoQuilmes
20%Scored in both halves20%
San TelmoQuilmes

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
San TelmoQuilmes
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
San TelmoQuilmes
80%BTTS - last 50%
San TelmoQuilmes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
San TelmoQuilmes
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
San TelmoQuilmes
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
San TelmoQuilmes

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
San TelmoQuilmes
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
San TelmoQuilmes
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
San TelmoQuilmes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Telmo is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - San Telmo · 1.2 pts / match - Quilmes

San Telmo - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing
Quilmes - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1.2
San TelmoQuilmes
1Goals scored (1st half)0.4
San TelmoQuilmes
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
San TelmoQuilmes
2Average goals (1st half)0.6
San TelmoQuilmes
20%Clean sheet before half-time80%
San TelmoQuilmes
40%No goal before half-time80%
San TelmoQuilmes

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1
San TelmoQuilmes
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
San TelmoQuilmes
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
San TelmoQuilmes
1.4Average goals (2nd half)0.6
San TelmoQuilmes
20%Clean sheet after half-time60%
San TelmoQuilmes
60%No goal after half-time80%
San TelmoQuilmes

San Telmo - second-half results

40% W0% D60% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Quilmes - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Telmo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Quilmes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

San Telmo
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Quilmes
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.30
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
128%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
16%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

San Telmo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
261%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Quilmes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.69
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).

Teams vs league

San TelmoLigaQuilmes
Average goals in match 3.401.79 1.20
Both teams scored 80%39% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%30% 20%
Clean sheets 0%40% 40%
Goal before half-time 100%61% 40%
Goal after half-time 100%70% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.10
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. San TelmoYellow cardMatías Alejandro Laba
  2. QuilmesYellow cardRamiro Martinez
  3. QuilmesGoalAgustín Lavezzi
  4. San TelmoSubstitutionOn: Elias Federico PeraltaOff: Joel Gonzalez
  5. QuilmesGoalUlises VeraAssist: Martín Vallejos
  6. San TelmoSubstitutionOn: Martín Leonel BatalliniOff: Román Gamarra
  7. San TelmoYellow cardFabián Gastón Henríquez
  8. QuilmesSubstitutionOn: Pedro Máximo ParedesOff: Ulises Vera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Juan Cruz RobledoMatches officiated: 12
5.92Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 257%Home wins0%Draws42%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of San Telmo vs Quilmes?

The Prim B Nacional match finished San Telmo 0:3 Quilmes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before San Telmo vs Quilmes?

San Telmo score 1.60 goals per game on average and Quilmes 0.60. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 80% of San Telmo's matches and 0% of Quilmes's.

What form are San Telmo and Quilmes in?

Over the last 5 games San Telmo have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Quilmes 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for San Telmo vs Quilmes?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for San Telmo vs Quilmes: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.