Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 23 October 2026

Sanat Naft vs Chadormalu SC: match statistics

Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Chadormalu SC crest
Chadormalu SC

Sanat Naft vs Chadormalu SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sanat Naft played Chadormalu SC in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 12 September 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Sanat Naft: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Chadormalu SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sanat Naft scores 0.17 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Chadormalu SC scores 0.33 and concedes 1.33. League average: 1.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sanat Naft 17%, Chadormalu SC 17%. Over 2.5: Sanat Naft 17%, Chadormalu SC 17%. League level: BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 19%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Sanat Naft: -1.0 shots per match, Chadormalu SC: -1.0.

Match halves

Sanat Naft: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Chadormalu SC: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Sanat Naft: 0-15 (1 goals). Chadormalu SC: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.72 goals per match, BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 19%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

This is shaping up to be a very evenly matched contest between two teams from the lower end of the table, currently sitting 16th and 15th respectively. Sanat Naft have failed to win any of their 6 matches so far, scoring just 1 goal, and have failed to find the net in each of their last 5 games. Chadormalu SC have a slightly better recent points record, averaging 1 point per game over the last five rounds compared with the hosts’ 0.6, but they have also scored just 2 goals all season. At home, Sanat Naft and away from home, Chadormalu average identical figures of 0.33 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per match, while both teams have failed to score in 67% of such fixtures. With draws recorded in 67% of these conditions for both sides, a stalemate appears to be the most likely outcome, probably in a very low-scoring game.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No: Sanat Naft have failed to score in each of their last 5 matches, while Chadormalu have averaged only 0.4 goals during this period. Across the season, both teams average just 0.33 goals per match, with Sanat Naft recording 67% of matches without scoring, a figure similar to that of the visitors. BTTS occurred in 0% of Sanat Naft’s matches and 33% of Chadormalu’s, while over the last five rounds these figures stand at 0% and 20%, respectively. The league also supports a low-scoring outlook, averaging 1.69 goals per match with BTTS at only 28%, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have very limited attacking potential: at home, Sanat Naft average 0.33 goals, while Chadormalu SC also average just 0.33 away from home. Sanat Naft have failed to score in their last five matches, while Chadormalu SC have averaged only 0.4 goals per game. The 2.5 line has been exceeded in just 20% of the last five matches for each team, and in the current data, neither side has played a match with at least four goals. Additionally, the league is clearly low-scoring, averaging 1.69 goals per game, with only 19% of matches going Over 2.5 goals. The projected total of 1.30 goals strongly supports Under 3.5, which is best backed by both the teams’ attacking form and the goal-scoring trends.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches. During this period, Sanat Naft failed to score before the break, while Chadormalu averaged just 0.2 goals, significantly limiting the chances of either side taking an early lead. The hosts are winless in their last five matches, recording 3 draws, while the visitors drew 2 of their 5 games and also score a modest 0.4 goals per match. The combined average goals scored by the two teams across their last five outings stands at 1.0 and 1.6 respectively, while only 22% of first halves in the league produce at least 2 goals. After the break, Chadormalu concede an average of 1.0 goals in their last five matches, but Sanat Naft have failed to score in those second halves, making a low-scoring draw the most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1Shots-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1Shots on target-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0xG0
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1Corners-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0Dangerous attacks0
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1Fouls-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
2Cards1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0.17Goals scored / match0.33
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
1Goals conceded / match1.33
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1%Average possession-1%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1Shots on target / match-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1Shots on target-1
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-16.7%Shot conversion-33.3%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
-1%Possession-1%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0xG for0
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0xG against0
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

Shooting quality

Sanat Naft: BalancedChadormalu SC: Balanced
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chadormalu SC is 67% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 1 pts / match - Chadormalu SC

Sanat Naft
DLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W67% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-2
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Chadormalu SC
DLLDW
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
DLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chadormalu SC is 94% better for: goals scored per match.

0.17 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 0.33 goals / match - Chadormalu SC

Sanat Naft is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 1.33 goals / match - Chadormalu SC

Sanat Naft scoring profile: more difficult

Sanat Naft scores in 17% of matches (1 of 6 matches), while Chadormalu SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

Chadormalu SC scoring profile: more difficult

Chadormalu SC scores in 33% of matches (2 of 6 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

1Goals scored (season)2
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
6Goals conceded (season)8
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
1.17Average goals in match1.67
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0Goals scored (last 5)2
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

How often they score at least...

17%1 goal33%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%2 goals0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%3 goals0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal67%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
33%2 goals50%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
17%3 goals17%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

28%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%Scored in both halves0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%BTTS - last 520%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

2nd half

17%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chadormalu SC is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 1.17 pts / match - Chadormalu SC

Sanat Naft - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Chadormalu SC - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)1.17
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.17
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
1Average goals (1st half)0.33
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
50%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
83%No goal before half-time83%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)0.67
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)1.17
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
0.17Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
83%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC
100%No goal after half-time83%
Sanat NaftChadormalu SC

Sanat Naft - second-half results

0% W83% D17% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chadormalu SC - second-half results

17% W17% D67% L
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match0.80.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Chadormalu SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Chadormalu SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
6%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
56%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
18%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Chadormalu SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
44%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Sanat NaftLigaChadormalu SC
Average goals in match▼ 1.171.72• 1.67
Both teams scored▼ 17%28%▼ 17%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%19%▼ 17%
Clean sheets▲ 50%46%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time• 50%51%▼ 33%
Goal after half-time▼ 17%65%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.72
Average goals per match
28%
Both teams scored
19%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.96
Home goals / match
0.75
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
51%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sanat NaftSubstitutionOn: Saman MehrabizadehOff: Mohsen Seifi
  2. Chadormalu SCYellow cardMohammad Hossein Khosravi
  3. Sanat NaftYellow cardKhashayar Zebarjad
  4. Chadormalu SCGoalReza Mirzaei
  5. Sanat NaftSubstitutionOn: Mohammad DindarOff: Alireza Rezaei
  6. Chadormalu SCSubstitutionOn: Seyed Mohammadtaha Tabatabaei BafqiOff: Reza Mirzaei
  7. Chadormalu SCSubstitutionOn: Seyed Ali Kamali JeloudarOff: Renny Sinisterra
  8. Sanat NaftGoalTaleb Rikani
  9. Chadormalu SCSubstitutionOn: Alireza Safari LaksarOff: Mohammad Hossein Khosravi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Chadormalu SC?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Sanat Naft 1:2 Chadormalu SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Chadormalu SC?

Sanat Naft score 0.17 goals per game on average and Chadormalu SC 0.33. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 19% of games. Both teams score in 17% of Sanat Naft's matches and 17% of Chadormalu SC's.

What form are Sanat Naft and Chadormalu SC in?

Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Chadormalu SC 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Chadormalu SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.