Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueShahid Dastgerdi StadiumData current as of 31 August 2026

Sanat Naft vs Foolad: match statistics

Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft
0 : 3half-time 0:3
Foolad crest
Foolad

Sanat Naft vs Foolad: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sanat Naft played Foolad in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 24 August 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Sanat Naft: 0-2-0, 1.00 points/match. Foolad: 0-2-0, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sanat Naft scores 0.50 and concedes 0.50 goals per match. Foolad scores 0.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 1.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sanat Naft 50%, Foolad 50%. Over 2.5: Sanat Naft 0%, Foolad 0%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 23%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Sanat Naft: -1.0 shots per match, Foolad: -1.0.

Match halves

Sanat Naft: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Foolad: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Sanat Naft: 0-15 (1 goals). Foolad: 46-60 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.96 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 23%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have started the season in identical fashion: two draws and a 1:1 record, making it difficult to identify a clear favourite. Sanat Naft and Foolad are also in identical overall form, with each winning 3, drawing 2 and scoring 8 goals in their last five matches. During this period, the hosts conceded just 2 goals, one fewer than Foolad, giving them a slight edge in defensive stability. On the other hand, Foolad’s only away match so far ended in a 0:0 draw with a clean sheet, while Sanat Naft also drew 1:1 at home. The data points to a very evenly matched and rather cautious encounter, with a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - No pick is primarily supported by the league’s very low-scoring profile: only 33% of matches have seen both teams score, while the average number of goals is just 1.78. Sanat Naft have conceded an average of only 0.4 goals in their last 5 matches, compared with 0.6 for Foolad, meaning both defenses regularly restrict opponents to very few chances. In the season data, Foolad have not scored a goal yet, have kept clean sheets in 100% of their matches, and have failed to score in 100% of games, strengthening the likelihood that at least one team will remain goalless. The recent attacking form of both sides is better, with each averaging 1.6 goals per match across their last five appearances, but BTTS figures from that period—40% for Sanat Naft and 60% for Foolad—are not sufficient to outweigh the defensive nature of the competition.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The league profile clearly favors low-scoring results: an average of 1.78 goals is scored, and only 17% of matches go over 2.5 goals. In the available data for both teams, all matches finished under 2.5 and 3.5 goals, with each side averaging 1 goal scored and 1 conceded. Their last five appearances have been slightly more attacking, as Sanat Naft and Foolad have scored 8 goals each, while their defenses have conceded only 2 and 3 goals, respectively. Sanat Naft have had at least three goals in 20% of matches in this sample, compared with 40% for Foolad, which nevertheless does not challenge the league’s very low frequency of high-scoring games. The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of 1.65 goals leaves a substantial margin even for a 2:1 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time, as both teams were level at the break in 60% of their last five matches, and neither side was trailing at half-time during this period. Sanat Naft averaged 1.0 goals scored before the break, while Foolad averaged 0.8, with both conceding an identical average of 0.4 goals, indicating very little difference in quality during the opening phase. Across their last five matches, both teams have averaged 2.2 points per game, with a record of three wins and two draws and no defeats, making it difficult to clearly favour either side for the final victory. After the break, Sanat Naft conceded no goals on average, while Foolad conceded just 0.2, limiting the likelihood of a decisive outcome. In addition, the league is low-scoring, averaging 1.78 goals per match, with 89% of games featuring at least one clean sheet, which supports the cautious X/X HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1Shots-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1Shots on target-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
0xG0
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1Corners-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
0Dangerous attacks0
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1Fouls-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
1Cards0
Sanat NaftFoolad

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.5Goals scored / match0.5
Sanat NaftFoolad
0.5Goals conceded / match0.5
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1%Average possession-1%
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1Shots on target / match-1
Sanat NaftFoolad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-1Shots per match-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1Shots on target-1
Sanat NaftFoolad
-50%Shot conversion-50%
Sanat NaftFoolad
-1%Possession-1%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0xG for0
Sanat NaftFoolad
0xG against0
Sanat NaftFoolad

Shooting quality

Sanat Naft: BalancedFoolad: Balanced
Sanat NaftFoolad
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sanat Naft
DD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%
Foolad
DD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-0
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sanat Naft scoring profile: mixed

Sanat Naft scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Foolad keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Foolad scoring profile: mixed

Foolad scores in 50% of matches (1 of 2 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

1Goals scored (season)1
Sanat NaftFoolad
1Goals conceded (season)1
Sanat NaftFoolad
1Average goals in match1
Sanat NaftFoolad
1Goals scored (last 5)1
Sanat NaftFoolad
1Goals conceded (last 5)1
Sanat NaftFoolad

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal50%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%2 goals0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%3 goals0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftFoolad

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%2 goals0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%3 goals0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftFoolad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

50%BTTS at half-time0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%Scored in both halves0%
Sanat NaftFoolad

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
50%BTTS - last 550%
Sanat NaftFoolad

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftFoolad

2nd half

0%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Sanat NaftFoolad
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Sanat NaftFoolad

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sanat Naft - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Foolad - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
Sanat NaftFoolad
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0
Sanat NaftFoolad
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
Sanat NaftFoolad
1Average goals (1st half)0
Sanat NaftFoolad
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Sanat NaftFoolad
50%No goal before half-time100%
Sanat NaftFoolad

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1
Sanat NaftFoolad
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Sanat NaftFoolad
0Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Sanat NaftFoolad
0Average goals (2nd half)1
Sanat NaftFoolad
100%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Sanat NaftFoolad
100%No goal after half-time50%
Sanat NaftFoolad

Sanat Naft - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
2
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Foolad - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.50.0
Goals conceded / match0.50.0
Average goals in match1.00.0
1 goal50%0%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 1
Foolad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.01.0
1 goal0%50%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Foolad
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
51%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Foolad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Sanat NaftLigaFoolad
Average goals in match 1.001.96 1.00
Both teams scored 50%38% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%23% 0%
Clean sheets 50%38% 50%
Goal before half-time 50%54% 0%
Goal after half-time 0%69% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.96
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
23%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.08
Home goals / match
0.88
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FooladGoalSasan AnsariAssist: Ramin Rezaeian
  2. FooladGoalMilad BadraghehAssist: Sasan Ansari

FAQ

What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Foolad?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Sanat Naft 0:3 Foolad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Foolad?

Sanat Naft score 0.50 goals per game on average and Foolad 0.50. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 23% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sanat Naft's matches and 50% of Foolad's.

What form are Sanat Naft and Foolad in?

Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 0-2-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Foolad 0-2-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Foolad?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanat Naft vs Foolad: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.