Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr: match statistics

Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Pars Jam Bushehr crest
Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sanat Naft play Pars Jam Bushehr in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 9 June 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Sanat Naft: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Pars Jam Bushehr: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sanat Naft scores 1.09 and concedes 0.62 goals per match. Pars Jam Bushehr scores 1.29 and concedes 0.65. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sanat Naft 38%, Pars Jam Bushehr 38%. Over 2.5: Sanat Naft 26%, Pars Jam Bushehr 32%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Sanat Naft has higher xG: 1.09 vs 0.93. Sanat Naft: 3.7 shots per match, Pars Jam Bushehr: 0.6.

Match halves

Sanat Naft: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Pars Jam Bushehr: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Sanat Naft: 46-60 (9 goals). Pars Jam Bushehr: 16-30 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Sanat Naft has a clear home advantage: they win 64% of home matches, have a +13 home goal difference and concede just 0.5 goals per home game while keeping clean sheets in 50% of those matches. Offensively the hosts average 1.43 goals per home game with an xG of 1.13 and 9.63 shots, compared to Pars Jam who record 1.15 goals away with an xG of 0.96 and only 5.67 shots. Pars Jam are, however, more efficient per shot (18% conversion vs 14% for Sanat Naft) and average 4.0 shots on target per away match versus the hosts’ 2.88, so they can be dangerous despite limited chances. Both teams have posted similar recent form — 1.0 point per match over the last five games — with Sanat Naft scoring 1 goal in their last 5 and Pars Jam 2 goals, indicating a temporary dip in finishing for both sides. Considering the hosts’ superior chance creation (xG 1.13 vs 0.96), greater possession control (54% vs 49%) and almost faultless home defence, I forecast a home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
6Shots5
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0Shots on target2
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.65xG0.59
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
3Corners1
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
38Dangerous attacks19
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
13Fouls15
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0Cards0
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.09Goals scored / match1.29
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.62Goals conceded / match0.65
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
24%Average possession11%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.94Shots on target / match0.12
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.68Shots per match0.56
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.94Shots on target0.12
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
29.6%Shot conversion231.6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
24%Possession11%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.09xG for0.93
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.84xG against1.06
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Shooting quality

Sanat Naft: Counter-attackingPars Jam Bushehr: Counter-attacking
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
Accuracy (shots on target)26%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.301.66
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.1610.75

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 18% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 2.6 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W35% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-6
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-6-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pars Jam Bushehr
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W35% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-6
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-3
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 1.29 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.62 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 0.65 goals / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft scoring profile: mixed

Sanat Naft scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Pars Jam Bushehr keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).

Pars Jam Bushehr scoring profile: strong

Pars Jam Bushehr scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

37Goals scored (season)44
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
21Goals conceded (season)22
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.71Average goals in match1.94
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
8Goals scored (last 5)12
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal74%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
29%2 goals38%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
9%3 goals9%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
6%4 goals6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal50%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
9%2 goals15%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0%3 goals0%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
Pars Jam Bushehr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 34 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
18%Scored in both halves24%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
40%BTTS - last 540%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pars Jam Bushehr is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 1.59 pts / match - Pars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft - half-time state
12% leading74% draw15% trailing
Pars Jam Bushehr - half-time state
38% leading44% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.59
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.53
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.68Average goals (1st half)0.82
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
68%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
74%No goal before half-time56%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per match (2nd half)1.56
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
0.26Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
74%Clean sheet after half-time74%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr
44%No goal after half-time50%
Sanat NaftPars Jam Bushehr

Sanat Naft - second-half results

47% W44% R9% P
37
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding392%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pars Jam Bushehr - second-half results

35% W50% R15% P
54
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Pars Jam Bushehr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match0.61.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
9
3
46-60
8
6
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Pars Jam Bushehr
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
9
4
16-30
6
2
31-45
7
3
46-60
9
3
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+64%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Pars Jam Bushehr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-21.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
187%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Sanat NaftLigaPars Jam Bushehr
Average goals in match 1.711.59 1.94
Both teams scored 38%30% 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%22% 32%
Clean sheets 47%46% 50%
Goal before half-time 41%46% 62%
Goal after half-time 65%57% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sanat Naft 1 - 0 - 0 Pars Jam Bushehr. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Pars Jam Bushehr
1 : 2
Sanat Naft

FAQ

What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

The Azadegan League match finished Sanat Naft 0:2 Pars Jam Bushehr. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

Sanat Naft score 1.09 goals per game on average and Pars Jam Bushehr 1.29. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Sanat Naft's matches and 38% of Pars Jam Bushehr's.

What form are Sanat Naft and Pars Jam Bushehr in?

Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Pars Jam Bushehr 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanat Naft vs Pars Jam Bushehr: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.