Norway - First DivisionSandnes IdrettsparkData current as of 06 September 2026

Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: match statistics

Sandnes Ulf crest
Sandnes Ulf
1 : 6half-time 0:3
Kongsvinger crest
Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sandnes Ulf played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Sandnes Idrettspark. Final score: 1:6.

Current form

Sandnes Ulf: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sandnes Ulf scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sandnes Ulf 50%, Kongsvinger 79%. Over 2.5: Sandnes Ulf 43%, Kongsvinger 86%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.41. Sandnes Ulf: 12.1 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 14.7.

Match halves

Sandnes Ulf: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.21. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50.

Goals by minute

Sandnes Ulf: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.73 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sandnes Ulf has a solid defensive record at home: they concede on average 1.00 goal per match and keep a clean sheet in 43% of games, while Kongsvinger concede an average of 1.57 goals away and have only 14% clean sheets. Offensively both teams show similar season efficiency — the hosts score 1.86 goals on average at home, and the visitors score 1.86 goals on average away — but in the last 5 matches Kongsvinger has scored 16 goals (3.2 avg.) versus Sandnes’s 11 goals (2.2 avg.). Average xG are virtually identical (1.57 for Sandnes and 1.58 for Kongsvinger), however Kongsvinger allows a higher xG against (1.76 vs 1.17), which suggests that despite higher possession (53% vs 41%) the visitors are more exposed to dangerous situations. Additionally the hosts have a better home record — 57% wins and +6 goal difference at home — while the visitors sit 2nd in the table and have 9 wins this season, but only +2 goal difference away. Considering Sandnes’s strong home defense and the offensive balance between the teams I forecast a home win (pick '1'); I assess the probabilities as: home win 50%, draw 24%, away win 26%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics indicate a high incidence of BTTS: Sandnes Ulf have 86% of matches with both teams scoring this season, Kongsvinger 71%, and the league average is 60%, suggesting an above-average likelihood of BTTS in this matchup. In the last 5 games Kongsvinger have 100% BTTS and concede an average of 2.2 goals, while Sandnes have 60% BTTS and concede 1.4 on average, meaning both teams regularly allow goals. Offensively Sandnes generate xG 1.96 on average and have a seasonal goals-scored average of 3.29 per match, whereas Kongsvinger have xG 1.58 and have scored 3.2 goals on average in their last 5 matches (16 goals), which increases the chance of goal returns for both sides. Both teams have low clean sheet rates at 14% and concede seasonally 1.43 and 1.57 goals respectively, which further supports the BTTS scenario. Therefore the most likely market outcome is BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of around 82%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sandnes generates on average xG 1.96 and 16.14 shots per match (6.86 on target) with a conversion rate of 20.0%, while Kongsvinger has xG 1.58 from 13.29 shots (5.57 on target) and a 14.0% conversion. A model based on average xG (home xG 1.96 and away xG conceded 1.76) yields 1.86 expected goals for Sandnes and 1.46 for Kongsvinger, totaling 3.32 goals. Seasonal stats are clear: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Sandnes has 100% of matches over 2.5 and Kongsvinger 71%, and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 86% and 71% respectively. In the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded/produced 16 goals (3.2 avg), and the home side 11 goals (2.2 avg), which further reinforces an expectation of a high-scoring game. Based on this I recommend the Over side, best line is Over 1.5 (prediction 97%), with strong support for Over 2.5 (~82%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~58%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sandnes Ulf are home favorites: they have won 86% of matches at their stadium and average 3.29 goals per game versus Kongsvinger’s 1.86; the hosts’ xG is 1.96 compared to the visitors’ 1.58, confirming a quality advantage. However, in the first half of the last five fixtures Kongsvinger scored 15 goals by the break (avg. 3.0), while Sandnes managed 4 first-half goals in those five matches (avg. 0.8), so there is a real risk of a draw or the visitors leading at the break. After the interval the hosts statistically dominate: Sandnes scored 8 goals in minutes 46–60 versus Kongsvinger’s 3 and average 2.29 goals after half-time compared to 0.71 for their opponents, and the hosts win 86% of second halves, which suggests a turnaround. Additionally, Sandnes’ shot conversion is 20% versus Kongsvinger’s 14%, so the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Sandnes Full-Time win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
10Shots4
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
4Shots on target2
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.27xG0.81
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
6Corners3
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
49Dangerous attacks56
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
13Fouls10
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1Cards1
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.57Goals scored / match2.57
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.43Goals conceded / match1.5
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
41%Average possession54%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
4.36Shots on target / match6.21
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.14Shots per match14.71
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
4.36Shots on target6.21
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
12.9%Shot conversion17.5%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
41%Possession54%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.41xG for1.77
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.39xG against1.55
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Shooting quality

Sandnes Ulf: Counter-attackingKongsvinger: Attacking
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sandnes Ulf
LWWWD
Season result split
43% W14% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-6
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kongsvinger
WWDLW
Season result split
64% W21% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-2
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kongsvinger is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf · 2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf · 1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf scoring profile: very strong

Sandnes Ulf scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

Kongsvinger scoring profile: very strong

Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

22Goals scored (season)36
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
20Goals conceded (season)21
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
3Average goals in match4.07
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
11Goals scored (last 5)16
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal93%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
43%2 goals86%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
21%3 goals50%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
14%4 goals21%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
43%2 goals36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
14%3 goals14%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7%4 goals14%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
21%Scored in both halves50%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS71%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kongsvinger is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Sandnes Ulf · 1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf - half-time state
21% leading43% draw36% trailing
Kongsvinger - half-time state
43% leading14% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.43
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.36Goals scored (1st half)1.07
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.93
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
57%Clean sheet before half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
71%No goal before half-time36%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)2.07
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
1.21Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
2.07Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
36%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger
29%No goal after half-time21%
Sandnes UlfKongsvinger

Sandnes Ulf - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding205%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kongsvinger - second-half results

64% W14% R21% P
20
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sandnes Ulf - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.00
Goals scored / match0.22.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.82.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kongsvinger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.40
Goals scored / match1.41.8
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match3.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sandnes Ulf
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
6
6
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Kongsvinger
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
7
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
11
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sandnes Ulf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.57
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Kongsvinger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
163%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

Sandnes UlfLigaKongsvinger
Average goals in match 3.003.73 4.07
Both teams scored 50%61% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%73% 86%
Clean sheets 29%21% 14%
Goal before half-time 64%76% 93%
Goal after half-time 93%89% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.73
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.15
Home goals / match
1.58
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
89%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
37%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KongsvingerGoalAndreas Dybevik
  2. Sandnes UlfGoalTord Rokkones Flolid
  3. KongsvingerYellow cardMapenda Mbow
  4. KongsvingerSubstitutionOn: Daniel LysgårdOff: Saadiq Faisal Elmi
  5. Sandnes UlfYellow cardGullbrandur í Horni Øregaard
  6. Sandnes UlfSubstitutionOn: Ådne Gikling BrusethOff: Yann-Erik de Lanlay
  7. KongsvingerGoalDaniel JobAssist: Andreas Dybevik
  8. KongsvingerGoalAngelos Chaminta
  9. Sandnes UlfGoalAli MemedAssist: Fillip Voster Botnen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?

The First Division match finished Sandnes Ulf 1:6 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?

Sandnes Ulf score 1.57 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.57. The First Division average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's matches and 79% of Kongsvinger's.

What form are Sandnes Ulf and Kongsvinger in?

Over the last 5 games Sandnes Ulf have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?

The statistical background for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.