Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sandnes Ulf played Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The match was played on 26 July 2026. Venue: Sandnes Idrettspark. Final score: 1:6.
Current form
Sandnes Ulf: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sandnes Ulf scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sandnes Ulf 50%, Kongsvinger 79%. Over 2.5: Sandnes Ulf 43%, Kongsvinger 86%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.41. Sandnes Ulf: 12.1 shots per match, Kongsvinger: 14.7.
Match halves
Sandnes Ulf: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 1.21. Kongsvinger: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Sandnes Ulf: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.73 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sandnes Ulf has a solid defensive record at home: they concede on average 1.00 goal per match and keep a clean sheet in 43% of games, while Kongsvinger concede an average of 1.57 goals away and have only 14% clean sheets. Offensively both teams show similar season efficiency — the hosts score 1.86 goals on average at home, and the visitors score 1.86 goals on average away — but in the last 5 matches Kongsvinger has scored 16 goals (3.2 avg.) versus Sandnes’s 11 goals (2.2 avg.). Average xG are virtually identical (1.57 for Sandnes and 1.58 for Kongsvinger), however Kongsvinger allows a higher xG against (1.76 vs 1.17), which suggests that despite higher possession (53% vs 41%) the visitors are more exposed to dangerous situations. Additionally the hosts have a better home record — 57% wins and +6 goal difference at home — while the visitors sit 2nd in the table and have 9 wins this season, but only +2 goal difference away. Considering Sandnes’s strong home defense and the offensive balance between the teams I forecast a home win (pick '1'); I assess the probabilities as: home win 50%, draw 24%, away win 26%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics indicate a high incidence of BTTS: Sandnes Ulf have 86% of matches with both teams scoring this season, Kongsvinger 71%, and the league average is 60%, suggesting an above-average likelihood of BTTS in this matchup. In the last 5 games Kongsvinger have 100% BTTS and concede an average of 2.2 goals, while Sandnes have 60% BTTS and concede 1.4 on average, meaning both teams regularly allow goals. Offensively Sandnes generate xG 1.96 on average and have a seasonal goals-scored average of 3.29 per match, whereas Kongsvinger have xG 1.58 and have scored 3.2 goals on average in their last 5 matches (16 goals), which increases the chance of goal returns for both sides. Both teams have low clean sheet rates at 14% and concede seasonally 1.43 and 1.57 goals respectively, which further supports the BTTS scenario. Therefore the most likely market outcome is BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of around 82%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sandnes generates on average xG 1.96 and 16.14 shots per match (6.86 on target) with a conversion rate of 20.0%, while Kongsvinger has xG 1.58 from 13.29 shots (5.57 on target) and a 14.0% conversion. A model based on average xG (home xG 1.96 and away xG conceded 1.76) yields 1.86 expected goals for Sandnes and 1.46 for Kongsvinger, totaling 3.32 goals. Seasonal stats are clear: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Sandnes has 100% of matches over 2.5 and Kongsvinger 71%, and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 86% and 71% respectively. In the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded/produced 16 goals (3.2 avg), and the home side 11 goals (2.2 avg), which further reinforces an expectation of a high-scoring game. Based on this I recommend the Over side, best line is Over 1.5 (prediction 97%), with strong support for Over 2.5 (~82%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (~58%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sandnes Ulf are home favorites: they have won 86% of matches at their stadium and average 3.29 goals per game versus Kongsvinger’s 1.86; the hosts’ xG is 1.96 compared to the visitors’ 1.58, confirming a quality advantage. However, in the first half of the last five fixtures Kongsvinger scored 15 goals by the break (avg. 3.0), while Sandnes managed 4 first-half goals in those five matches (avg. 0.8), so there is a real risk of a draw or the visitors leading at the break. After the interval the hosts statistically dominate: Sandnes scored 8 goals in minutes 46–60 versus Kongsvinger’s 3 and average 2.29 goals after half-time compared to 0.71 for their opponents, and the hosts win 86% of second halves, which suggests a turnaround. Additionally, Sandnes’ shot conversion is 20% versus Kongsvinger’s 14%, so the most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw and a Sandnes Full-Time win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sandnes Ulf | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf · 2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Sandnes Ulf is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.43 goals / match - Sandnes Ulf · 1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger
Sandnes Ulf scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sandnes Ulf
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.07 pts / match - Sandnes Ulf · 1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sandnes Ulf - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sandnes Ulf
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sandnes Ulf | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.00 | 3.73 | ▲ 4.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 76% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 89% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Sandnes Ulf 1:6 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?
Sandnes Ulf score 1.57 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.57. The First Division average is 3.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's matches and 79% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Sandnes Ulf and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Sandnes Ulf have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger?
The statistical background for Sandnes Ulf vs Kongsvinger — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


