Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: match statistics
Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sangju Sangmu played Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Sangju Sangmu: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Anyang: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sangju Sangmu scores 0.83 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Anyang scores 1.00 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 83%, Anyang 83%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 17%, Anyang 33%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Sangju Sangmu has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.15. Sangju Sangmu: 10.8 shots per match, Anyang: 8.7.
Match halves
Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50. Anyang: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Sangju Sangmu: 46-60 (2 goals). Anyang: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw. Sangju Sangmu at home has 0% wins and 100% draws (0 wins, 5 draws), scores on average 1.0 goals per home match with 12.33 average shots and 4 on target and xG 1.5, while conceding 1.0 goals on average (xG against 1.26). Anyang away also has no wins (0% wins) and records 67% draws, averaging 8.67 shots and 4.33 on target per match with xG 1.22, but a higher shot conversion rate of 12% versus the home side’s 8%. Defensively Anyang allows more high-quality chances (average xG against 1.80 and 1.33 goals conceded away), whereas the hosts have clearer ball control (51% possession vs 38%) and a greater volume of attempts. Considering the hosts’ higher xG and more shots along with the very high draw rates of both teams, the most likely outcome is a points split (60% draw, 25% Sangju win, 15% Anyang win).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS - Yes comes from season-long numbers: Anyang has BTTS 100% while Sangju 67%, and in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS 80%, which strongly points to both sides scoring. In their last 5 games Sangju scored 4 and conceded 5 (avg 0.8 scored, 1.0 conceded), and Anyang scored 5 and conceded 6 (1.0 scored, 1.2 conceded), so both sides regularly concede. xG analysis shows Sangju produces 1.08 xG and allows 1.07 xG per match, while Anyang produces 1.22 xG and concedes as much as 1.80 xG, suggesting Anyang creates chances but also leaks them more often. Additionally both teams have 0% clean sheets this season, and season averages are 1.0 goals for (Sangju) and 1.0 (Anyang) with average goals conceded 1.0 and 1.33, so the overall statistical picture favors a scenario where both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect 1.44 goals for Sangju Sangmu and 1.15 for Anyang (total 2.59), calculated from xG: home xG_for 1.08 vs xG_against_away 1.80, away xG_for 1.22 vs xG_against_home 1.07. Seasonally Over 1.5 occurred in 67% of the home team’s matches and 100% of the away team’s matches, and BTTS is 67%/100%, which strongly favors Over 1.5 (I estimate 88%). The 2.5 line is more balanced: seasonally Over 2.5 is 33% for both teams, and in the last 5 matches the values are 20% and 40%, so despite an xG_total of 2.59 I give Over 2.5 a moderate 45% (Under 55%). Over 3.5 looks unlikely with seasonal 0% for both sides, so I estimate its probability at 8% and recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely half-time outcome is a draw: Sangju were level at the break in 67% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 67%), while Anyang were level at half-time in 100% (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 100%), with average goals scored by half being 0.0 for the home side and 0.67 for the away side (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0 vs scoredAVGHT_away = 0.67). In the second half the home team dominates — Sangju score on average 1.0 goals after the break (scored_2hg_avg_home = 1.0) and record 67% second-half wins (wins_2hg_percentage_home = 67%), whereas Anyang score 0.33 goals in the second half (scored_2hg_avg_away = 0.33) and register 0% second-half wins (wins_2hg_percentage_away = 0.0). Additionally, the home xG is 1.08 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.08) versus the xG created by the visitors of 1.22 (xg_for_avg_away = 1.22), but Anyang concede on average 1.8 xG defensively (xg_against_avg_away = 1.8) compared to 1.07 xG conceded by Sangju (xg_against_avg_home = 1.07), indicating a weaker away defence. As a result the strongest signal is a Half-Time/Full-Time draw at the break and a home win after the match (X/1) — I assign this scenario a 50% probability, draw-to-full-time (X/X) I rate at 30%, and the remaining variants are given low values due to the lack of leads at the break (leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 0.0 and leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 0.0).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sangju Sangmu | Anyang | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Anyang is 25% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1 pts / match - Anyang
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Anyang is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
0.83 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1 goals / match - Anyang
Sangju Sangmu is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.17 goals / match - Anyang
Sangju Sangmu scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
Anyang scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sangju Sangmu
Over / Under - Anyang
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sangju Sangmu is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.83 pts / match - Anyang
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sangju Sangmu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Anyang - second-half results
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sangju Sangmu
Anyang
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Sangju Sangmu | Liga | Anyang | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.83 | 2.08 | • 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 53% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 33% | • 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 30% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 73% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Sangju Sangmu 2 - 0 - 1 Anyang. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?
The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 1:1 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Anyang?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 2, Anyang won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?
Sangju Sangmu score 0.83 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.00. The K League 1 average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 83% of Anyang's.
What form are Sangju Sangmu and Anyang in?
Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Anyang 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?
The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.