South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Anyang crest
Anyang

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sangju Sangmu play Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Anyang: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Anyang scores 1.37 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Anyang 74%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Anyang 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Sangju Sangmu has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.27. Sangju Sangmu: 12.4 shots per match, Anyang: 9.7.

Match halves

Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58. Anyang: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). Anyang: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 2-1-1. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 75%.

Match description

I predict a draw. Sangju Sangmu at home has 0% wins and 100% draws (0 wins, 5 draws), scores on average 1.0 goals per home match with 12.33 average shots and 4 on target and xG 1.5, while conceding 1.0 goals on average (xG against 1.26). Anyang away also has no wins (0% wins) and records 67% draws, averaging 8.67 shots and 4.33 on target per match with xG 1.22, but a higher shot conversion rate of 12% versus the home side’s 8%. Defensively Anyang allows more high-quality chances (average xG against 1.80 and 1.33 goals conceded away), whereas the hosts have clearer ball control (51% possession vs 38%) and a greater volume of attempts. Considering the hosts’ higher xG and more shots along with the very high draw rates of both teams, the most likely outcome is a points split (60% draw, 25% Sangju win, 15% Anyang win).

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
Sangju SangmuAnyang
19Shots14
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Shots on target3
Sangju SangmuAnyang
2.22xG1.4
Sangju SangmuAnyang
12Corners5
Sangju SangmuAnyang
83Dangerous attacks43
Sangju SangmuAnyang
10Fouls6
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3Cards2
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.95Goals scored / match1.37
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.37Goals conceded / match1.16
Sangju SangmuAnyang
57%Average possession43%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.53Shots on target / match3.95
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.37Shots per match9.74
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.53Shots on target3.95
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7.7%Shot conversion14.1%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
57%Possession43%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.48xG for1.27
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.35xG against1.72
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedAnyang: Counter-attacking
Sangju SangmuAnyang
Accuracy (shots on target)29%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Anyang is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 2 pts / match - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Anyang
WLWDW
Season result split
32% W47% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-4
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.37 goals / match - Anyang

Anyang is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.16 goals / match - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Anyang scoring profile: very strong

Anyang scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

18Goals scored (season)26
Sangju SangmuAnyang
26Goals conceded (season)22
Sangju SangmuAnyang
2.32Average goals in match2.53
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3Goals scored (last 5)9
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
16%2 goals32%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
5%3 goals11%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%2 goals26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%3 goals5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
5%BTTS in both halves11%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%Scored in both halves26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
60%BTTS - last 580%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Anyang is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.47 pts / match - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Anyang - half-time state
26% leading68% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1.47
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.26
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.05Average goals (1st half)0.84
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%Clean sheet before half-time74%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
63%No goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.68
Sangju SangmuAnyang
32%Clean sheet after half-time26%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%No goal after half-time37%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Anyang - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Anyang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaAnyang
Average goals in match 2.322.31 2.53
Both teams scored 68%51% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%39% 37%
Clean sheets 11%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 68%63% 53%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Sangju Sangmu 2 - 1 - 1 Anyang. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Anyang
2 : 2
Sangju Sangmu
FC Anyang
4 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
1 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
1 : 3
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 1:1 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Anyang?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 2, Anyang won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

Sangju Sangmu score 0.95 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.37. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 74% of Anyang's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Anyang in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Anyang 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.