Sangju Sangmu vs Bucheon 1995: match statistics
Sangju Sangmu vs Bucheon 1995: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sangju Sangmu play Bucheon 1995 in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 11 July 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Bucheon 1995: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Bucheon 1995 scores 0.89 and concedes 1.26. League average: 2.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Bucheon 1995 42%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Bucheon 1995 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Sangju Sangmu has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.23. Sangju Sangmu: 12.4 shots per match, Bucheon 1995: 9.9.
Match halves
Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58. Bucheon 1995: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). Bucheon 1995: 61-75 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
A draw appears most likely: Sangju have 0% home wins and as many as 63% of their home matches end in draws, and they haven’t registered a win in their last 5 home fixtures. Visitors show better defensive form — in their last 5 matches Bucheon have averaged 1.0 point per game and conceded 4 goals (0.8 per game), while Sangju have only 0.4 points per game and have conceded 9 goals (1.8 per game). Hosts generate chances: on average 13.75 shots at home (3.88 on target) and xG 1.64, but only 0.75 goals per game with a shot conversion of 5%, indicating significant finishing issues. Bucheon away take 9.63 shots (2.63 on target), have xG 1.20 and a higher conversion of 9%, but fail to register a shot in 50% of their away games, which limits their threat. Given Sangju’s high home draw rate, the hosts’ poor finishing, and Bucheon’s superior defense and form, I assign draw 50%, away win 35% and home win 15%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sangju Sangmu | Bucheon 1995 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bucheon 1995 is 67% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1 pts / match - Bucheon 1995
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sangju Sangmu is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.89 goals / match - Bucheon 1995
Bucheon 1995 is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.26 goals / match - Bucheon 1995
Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Bucheon 1995 keeps a clean sheet in 32% (6 of 19 matches).
Bucheon 1995 scores in 58% of matches (11 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Sangju Sangmu
Over / Under — Bucheon 1995
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sangju Sangmu is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.68 pts / match - Bucheon 1995
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sangju Sangmu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Bucheon 1995 - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sangju Sangmu
Bucheon 1995
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Sangju Sangmu | Liga | Bucheon 1995 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.32 | 2.31 | ▼ 2.16 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 51% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 30% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 73% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Sangju Sangmu 1 - 0 - 0 Bucheon 1995. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Bucheon 1995?
The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 1:1 Bucheon 1995. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Bucheon 1995?
Sangju Sangmu score 0.95 goals per game on average and Bucheon 1995 0.89. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 42% of Bucheon 1995's.
What form are Sangju Sangmu and Bucheon 1995 in?
Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Bucheon 1995 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Bucheon 1995?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.