South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 26 October 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Gangwon: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
2 : 2half-time 2:0
Gangwon crest
Gangwon

Sangju Sangmu vs Gangwon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sangju Sangmu played Gangwon in K League 1 (South Korea). The match was played on 13 September 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Gangwon: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.93 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Gangwon scores 1.26 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 61%, Gangwon 44%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Gangwon 41%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

Gangwon has higher xG: 1.68 vs 1.53. Sangju Sangmu: 13.1 shots per match, Gangwon: 13.3.

Match halves

Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.54. Gangwon: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (6 goals). Gangwon: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-3. Average goals 1.83, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Gangwon sit 4th, while Sangju Sangmu are 11th, and the visitors’ overall season record (10 wins, 10 draws and 6 defeats) clearly surpasses the hosts’ tally of 4 wins, 16 draws and 7 defeats. Sangju have failed to win any of their last five matches, scoring just 4 goals and averaging 0.6 points per game, whereas Gangwon have lost only once during this period and average 1.2 points. Away from home, the visitors score an average of 1.21 goals and concede 0.93, while the hosts manage just 0.92 goals per home match and allow opponents to score 1.38. Although Sangju create more quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.69 compared with Gangwon’s 1.57 away from home, they convert only 6% of their shots, versus the visitors’ 10% conversion rate. Sangju’s high home draw rate of 69% increases the likelihood of a share of the points, but Gangwon’s 50% away clean-sheet rate and more consistent defence point slightly towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points toward BTTS - No, as Gangwon kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while Sangju Sangmu did so in 42%. The visitors failed to score in 36% of their games, while the hosts average only 1.33 goals per match and have reduced that figure to 0.8 across their last five appearances. Gangwon’s seasonal BTTS rate is just 36%, clearly below the league average of 51%, and both teams scored in only 20% of the club’s last five matches. The hosts’ attacking potential remains notable, reflected by an xG of 1.82, but Gangwon’s solid defense, conceding an average of 0.93 goals and allowing opponents an xG of 1.41, increases the likelihood that at least one team will finish the match without scoring. In other words, BTTS - No means that at least one team is expected not to score; it does not automatically imply a 0:0 result or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is on Under 3.5 goals, as only 8% of Sangju Sangmu’s matches went beyond this line, compared with 14% of Gangwon’s matches. Both teams are also solid defensively: the hosts concede an average of 0.92 goals per match, while the visitors concede 0.93, with 42% and 50% of their matches ending with a clean sheet, respectively. Recent form does not point to an attacking explosion, as Sangju scored 4 goals in five matches and Gangwon scored 5, despite both teams recording Over 2.5 goals in 60% of their matches during this short period. The 2.25-goal projection factors in the hosts’ decent xG of 1.82 and the visitors’ 1.57, but also their low finishing efficiency and limited number of high-scoring results. The 3.5 line leaves clear room for a 1:1, 2:0, or 2:1 result, which is why Under offers the greatest edge.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is strongly supported by the profile of both teams: Sangju Sangmu were level at the break in 33% of their matches, while Gangwon did so in 43%, with very low averages of 1.17 and 1.07 total goals in the first halves, respectively. In their last five matches, both clubs went into half-time level in 60% of cases, while Gangwon scored just 0.2 goals per game before the break. After half-time, however, the form advantage shifts to the visitors, who averaged 0.8 goals and earned 1.6 points in the second half across their last five appearances, whereas the hosts scored only 0.2 goals and conceded 1.2. Gangwon also have the better current results trend, averaging 1.2 points per match compared with Sangju Sangmu's 0.6, so the most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by an away win at the final whistle (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Sangju SangmuGangwon
10Shots14
Sangju SangmuGangwon
5Shots on target4
Sangju SangmuGangwon
1.34xG1.65
Sangju SangmuGangwon
5Corners5
Sangju SangmuGangwon
49Dangerous attacks67
Sangju SangmuGangwon
12Fouls12
Sangju SangmuGangwon
2Cards1
Sangju SangmuGangwon

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuGangwon
0.93Goals scored / match1.26
Sangju SangmuGangwon
1.21Goals conceded / match0.93
Sangju SangmuGangwon
55%Average possession52%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
3.75Shots on target / match4.48
Sangju SangmuGangwon

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.07Shots per match13.26
Sangju SangmuGangwon
3.75Shots on target4.48
Sangju SangmuGangwon
7.1%Shot conversion9.5%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
55%Possession52%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
1.53xG for1.68
Sangju SangmuGangwon
1.36xG against1.21
Sangju SangmuGangwon

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedGangwon: Balanced
Sangju SangmuGangwon
Accuracy (shots on target)29%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gangwon is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.2 pts / match - Gangwon

Sangju Sangmu
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
14% W61% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-17-7
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-9-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gangwon
LDDWD
Season result split
37% W41% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-11-6
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gangwon is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

0.93 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.26 goals / match - Gangwon

Gangwon is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.93 goals / match - Gangwon

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: mixed

Sangju Sangmu scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Gangwon keeps a clean sheet in 44% (12 of 27 matches).

Gangwon scoring profile: very strong

Gangwon scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).

26Goals scored (season)34
Sangju SangmuGangwon
34Goals conceded (season)25
Sangju SangmuGangwon
2.14Average goals in match2.19
Sangju SangmuGangwon
3Goals scored (last 5)6
Sangju SangmuGangwon
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
Sangju SangmuGangwon

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal74%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
18%2 goals37%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
7%3 goals15%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal56%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
36%2 goals26%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
11%3 goals11%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time11%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
7%BTTS in both halves4%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
14%Scored in both halves22%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
40%BTTS - last 540%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Gangwon is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 1.37 pts / match - Gangwon

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading57% draw21% trailing
Gangwon - half-time state
33% leading37% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.37
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.11
Sangju SangmuGangwon
61%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
64%No goal before half-time59%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.63
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
Sangju SangmuGangwon
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
Sangju SangmuGangwon
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.07
Sangju SangmuGangwon
39%Clean sheet after half-time70%
Sangju SangmuGangwon
54%No goal after half-time44%
Sangju SangmuGangwon

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

18% W54% D29% L
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gangwon - second-half results

37% W52% D11% L
37
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gangwon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
9
31-45
3
5
46-60
6
8
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gangwon
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
11
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Gangwon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaGangwon
Average goals in match▼ 2.142.45▼ 2.19
Both teams scored▲ 61%52%▼ 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 32%45%▼ 41%
Clean sheets▼ 25%30%▲ 44%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%60%▲ 70%
Goal after half-time▼ 71%77%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.16
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sangju SangmuGoalJoo-Chan Kim
  2. Sangju SangmuYellow cardMin-Kyu Kim
  3. Sangju SangmuGoalSe-Jin ParkAssist: Lee-Seok Kim
  4. GangwonSubstitutionOn: Sang-Hyeok ParkOff: Gun-Hee Kim
  5. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Yun-Sang HongOff: Joo-Chan Kim
  6. GangwonSubstitutionOn: Dong-Hyun KimOff: Ho-Young Park
  7. Sangju SangmuYellow cardCheol-Woo Park
  8. GangwonSubstitutionOn: Seung-Bin JeongOff: Young-jun Go
  9. GangwonGoalDae-Won KimAssist: Dong-Hyun Kim
  10. GangwonYellow cardMarko Tuci
  11. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Jae-Min JeongOff: Sang-Heon Lee
  12. GangwonGoalDae-Won Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Sangju Sangmu 2 - 1 - 3 Gangwon. Average goals 1.83, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Gangwon
2 : 0
Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu
0 : 3
Gangwon
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
0 : 1
Gangwon FC
Gangwon FC
0 : 0
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Gangwon FC
0 : 4
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
1 : 0
Gangwon FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Gangwon?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 2:2 Gangwon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Gangwon?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 2, Gangwon won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Gangwon?

Sangju Sangmu score 0.93 goals per game on average and Gangwon 1.26. The K League 1 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 44% of Gangwon's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Gangwon in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Gangwon 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Gangwon?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sangju Sangmu vs Gangwon: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.