South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Gwangju crest
Gwangju
130%(1.84)
X40%(3.30)
230%(3.65)

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched clash with a draw being the favored scenario. Sangju Sangmu has a 100% draw rate at home (3 matches), remaining undefeated at their stadium but also failing to win a single game. Gwangju similarly boasts a 100% draw rate in away matches along with an impressive 100% clean sheet record, demonstrating a solid defense. Both teams have an identical goal difference in their respective home and away fixtures (0), and their form over the last 5 matches is comparable (Sangju 1.2 PPG vs Gwangju 1.6 PPG). The xG stats are close, although Gwangju controls more of the ball (66% possession). Considering both teams' tendency to draw and the visitors' defensive approach on the road, a draw is the most probable outcome for this match.

Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sangju Sangmu play Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 17 March 2026 at 11:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Gwangju: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Gwangju scores 0.53 and concedes 2.26. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sangju Sangmu 68%, Gwangju 37%. Over 2.5: Sangju Sangmu 32%, Gwangju 47%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Sangju Sangmu has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.03. Sangju Sangmu: 12.4 shots per match, Gwangju: 8.1.

Match halves

Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58. Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.37.

Goals by minute

Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). Gwangju: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 0-3-1. Average goals 1.25, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched clash with a draw being the favored scenario. Sangju Sangmu has a 100% draw rate at home (3 matches), remaining undefeated at their stadium but also failing to win a single game. Gwangju similarly boasts a 100% draw rate in away matches along with an impressive 100% clean sheet record, demonstrating a solid defense. Both teams have an identical goal difference in their respective home and away fixtures (0), and their form over the last 5 matches is comparable (Sangju 1.2 PPG vs Gwangju 1.6 PPG). The xG stats are close, although Gwangju controls more of the ball (66% possession). Considering both teams' tendency to draw and the visitors' defensive approach on the road, a draw is the most probable outcome for this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Sangju SangmuGwangju
16Shots17
Sangju SangmuGwangju
5Shots on target6
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.8xG1.86
Sangju SangmuGwangju
8Corners4
Sangju SangmuGwangju
62Dangerous attacks51
Sangju SangmuGwangju
14Fouls18
Sangju SangmuGwangju
6Cards4
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.95Goals scored / match0.53
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.37Goals conceded / match2.26
Sangju SangmuGwangju
57%Average possession45%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
3.53Shots on target / match2.32
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.37Shots per match8.11
Sangju SangmuGwangju
3.53Shots on target2.32
Sangju SangmuGwangju
7.7%Shot conversion6.5%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
57%Possession45%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.48xG for1.03
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.35xG against1.78
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedGwangju: Balanced
Sangju SangmuGwangju
Accuracy (shots on target)29%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-6-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Gwangju
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
5% W37% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-7-11
0.53 pts / match · goal difference -33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sangju Sangmu is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.53 goals / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu · 2.26 goals / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

Gwangju scoring profile: strong

Gwangju scores in 37% of matches (7 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

18Goals scored (season)10
Sangju SangmuGwangju
26Goals conceded (season)43
Sangju SangmuGwangju
2.32Average goals in match2.79
Sangju SangmuGwangju
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Sangju SangmuGwangju
6Goals conceded (last 5)10
Sangju SangmuGwangju

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal37%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
16%2 goals11%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
5%3 goals5%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0%4 goals0%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal84%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
37%2 goals47%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
11%3 goals42%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0%4 goals32%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time16%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
11%Scored in both halves5%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

BTTS and goal count

21%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS32%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
60%BTTS - last 560%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
37%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sangju Sangmu is 109% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu · 0.53 pts / match - Gwangju

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Gwangju - half-time state
0% leading53% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)0.53
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.16
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.68Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.05
Sangju SangmuGwangju
53%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
63%No goal before half-time84%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)0.63
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.37
Sangju SangmuGwangju
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)1.37
Sangju SangmuGwangju
1.26Average goals (2nd half)1.74
Sangju SangmuGwangju
32%Clean sheet after half-time26%
Sangju SangmuGwangju
53%No goal after half-time74%
Sangju SangmuGwangju

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Gwangju - second-half results

5% W47% R47% P
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.53
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Gwangju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gwangju
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
1
6
16-30
1
5
31-45
3
13
46-60
3
4
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.56
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Gwangju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.75
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.98
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
207%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaGwangju
Average goals in match 2.322.31 2.79
Both teams scored 68%51% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 32%39% 47%
Clean sheets 11%30% 16%
Goal before half-time 68%63% 58%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Sangju Sangmu 0 - 3 - 1 Gwangju. Average goals 1.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Gwangju
1 : 1
Sangju Sangmu
Gwangju FC
1 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Gwangju FC
1 : 0
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
0 : 0
Gwangju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 1:1 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 0, Gwangju won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?

Sangju Sangmu score 0.95 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.53. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 37% of Gwangju's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Gwangju in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Gwangju 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju?

The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.