Sanjoanense vs Fafe: match statistics
Sanjoanense vs Fafe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Sanjoanense played Fafe in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Current form
Sanjoanense: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Fafe: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Sanjoanense scores 1.13 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Fafe scores 1.25 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Sanjoanense 63%, Fafe 50%. Over 2.5: Sanjoanense 54%, Fafe 38%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Fafe has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.14. Sanjoanense: 7.9 shots per match, Fafe: 11.8.
Match halves
Sanjoanense: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.54. Fafe: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Sanjoanense: 31-45+ (9 goals). Fafe: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 3: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sanjoanense are yet to win at home (home win rate 0%) and have drawn 67% of their matches, while averaging 1.33 goals scored and 1.92 conceded per game; in their last 5 matches they have collected only 0.6 points per game and conceded 9 goals while scoring 6. Fafe arrive in better recent form – 1.6 points per game over the last 5 – with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss and 5 goals scored and 4 conceded in that period. In terms of quality of chances, xG indicates a balanced contest: Sanjoanense have a home xG of 1.35 versus Fafe’s away xG of 1.24, but Fafe defend better (conceding 1.36 goals on average away versus the hosts’ 1.92). Additionally, the hosts have a lower clean sheet rate (8% vs 18%) and draw more often, while the visitors fail to score more frequently (no goals in 36% of away matches vs 25% for the hosts), which increases the likelihood of a shared point. On this basis I primarily expect a draw, with a non-negligible chance of an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean towards BTTS - Yes — Sanjoanense has an 80% BTTS rate in the last 5 matches, while Fafe shows a seasonal BTTS rate of 55%, providing strong short-term and seasonal signals for both teams to score. Both sides produce tangible chances: Sanjoanense xG is 1.83 versus 1.24 for Fafe, and average SOT is 5.38 vs 3.73, which increases the likelihood that both teams will create opportunities. Counterarguments exist — Sanjoanense has kept a clean sheet in 46% of season matches, and Fafe failed to score in 36% of fixtures — however recent form shows Sanjoanense concedes on average 1.8 goals in the last 5 games (9 conceded), and Fafe scored 5 goals in that period. Additionally the league averages 2.21 goals per match with BTTS at 48%, indicating no dominant low-scoring trend; combining 80% (last5 Sanjoanense), the xG advantage (1.83 vs 1.24) and higher SOT, I give the BTTS scenario the edge.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Sanjoanense has xG_for 1.83, Fafe 1.24, and considering opponents' xG (Fafe xG_against 1.15, Sanjoanense xG_against 1.03) we get a projection of ~1.49 goals for the home side and ~1.14 for the visitors, totaling 2.63 expected goals. Sanjoanense averages 14.08 shots and 5.38 on target per match versus Fafe's 9.18/3.73, while seasonal goal averages are 1.46 (home) vs 1.00 (away) with goals conceded 0.85 and 1.36 respectively, indicating home-side initiative. Seasonal shares of matches over 1.5 stand at 69% for Sanjoanense and 64% for Fafe; a Poisson model with λ=2.63 gives roughly a 74% chance of Over 1.5, 49% for Over 2.5 and 27% for Over 3.5, consistent with local indicators (home over2.5 46%, away 27%). As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (over) due to xG 1.49 vs 1.14, higher home chance creation and high season rates of 69%/64%; the 2.5 line is effectively a coin toss (49%/51%), while 3.5 clearly favors the under.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At Half-Time the most likely outcome appears to be a draw: the visitors were level at the break in 64% of matches and the hosts in 31%, which provides a strong signal for a draw HT. Nevertheless, I expect Sanjoanense to win at Full-Time: the hosts average 2.08 points per match versus 0.73 for Fafe, they have won 62% of matches this season compared to 9% for the visitors, and their xG is 1.83 versus 1.24 for the opposition with a higher number of shots on target (5.38 vs 3.73). The second half is decisive — Sanjoanense averages 1.08 goals after the break, wins 62% of second halves, have collected 26 points in second halves and average 2.0 points in those periods, while Fafe have only 0.55 goals in the second half and average 0.82 points in those phases. Additionally, the hosts frequently stage turnarounds (they trailed at HT in 38% of their games) and score most often in minutes 61–75 (6 goals) and 76–90 (5 goals), whereas Fafe have only 1 and 2 goals in those intervals, which strongly supports the HT draw and the hosts’ Full-Time victory scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Sanjoanense | Fafe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Fafe is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Sanjoanense · 1.6 pts / match - Fafe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fafe is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Sanjoanense · 1.25 goals / match - Fafe
Fafe is 62% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.75 goals / match - Sanjoanense · 1.08 goals / match - Fafe
Sanjoanense scores in 67% of matches (16 of 24 matches), while Fafe keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
Fafe scores in 75% of matches (18 of 24 matches), while Sanjoanense keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sanjoanense
Over / Under - Fafe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fafe is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - Sanjoanense · 1.21 pts / match - Fafe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sanjoanense - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Fafe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Sanjoanense
Fafe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).
Teams vs league
| Sanjoanense | Liga | Fafe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.88 | 2.21 | ▲ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 39% | • 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 31% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 66% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 73% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Sanjoanense 1 - 1 - 1 Fafe. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Sanjoanense vs Fafe?
The Liga 3 match finished Sanjoanense 2:3 Fafe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sanjoanense and Fafe?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sanjoanense won 1, Fafe won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sanjoanense vs Fafe?
Sanjoanense score 1.13 goals per game on average and Fafe 1.25. The Liga 3 average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Sanjoanense's matches and 50% of Fafe's.
What form are Sanjoanense and Fafe in?
Over the last 5 games Sanjoanense have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Fafe 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanjoanense vs Fafe?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanjoanense vs Fafe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


