São Bernardo vs Sport Recife: match statistics
São Bernardo vs Sport Recife: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
São Bernardo played Sport Recife in Serie B (Brazil). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: Estádio Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
São Bernardo: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Sport Recife: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
São Bernardo scores 1.67 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Sport Recife scores 1.33 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.30 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: São Bernardo 58%, Sport Recife 50%. Over 2.5: São Bernardo 50%, Sport Recife 33%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Sport Recife has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.22. São Bernardo: 11.5 shots per match, Sport Recife: 12.7.
Match halves
São Bernardo: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.17. Sport Recife: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
São Bernardo: 76-90+ (7 goals). Sport Recife: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
São Bernardo has a clear advantage in chance creation: at home they register average xG 1.37, produce 13.5 shots per match of which 4.33 are on target, translating to 1.17 goals per match and 9 goals scored in the last 5 fixtures. Sport Recife away impresses defensively — conceding just 0.4 goals per away game on average, with clean sheets in 60% of matches and a 6:4 goal record in their last 5 away appearances. Form is balanced: São Bernardo averages 2.2 pts per match over the last 5 and is unbeaten in those five (W D W D W), while Sport averages 2.0 pts and has 3 wins in that period (W W L W D). Efficiency differences are small — shot conversion 9% for the hosts versus 11% for the visitors, and the share of matches without a goal is 17% for São Bernardo and 40% for Sport, which indicates the visitors more frequently struggle to score despite higher possession (54% vs 49%). Considering this, I give a slight edge to São Bernardo: home win 48%, draw 31% and Sport win 21%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
More signals favor BTTS - Yes due to the home side's form: São Bernardo have a season BTTS rate of 57% and an 80% rate in their last 5 matches, averaging 1.8 goals scored in those five and 1.43 goals per match for the season. The hosts create 13.86 shots and 5.57 shots on target per match with an xG of 1.51, and conceded an average of 1.0 goal in the last 5 matches, increasing the likelihood the opponent will convert at least one chance. Sport Recife, however, presents strong arguments against BTTS: only 40% of their matches are BTTS season-wide, 60% of matches are clean sheet expected, and they concede just 0.4 goals per match while averaging only 2.2 shots on target. The gap between xG against Sport of 1.53 and their actual 0.4 goals conceded suggests the low goals-against figure may partially result from defensive organization or luck; given São Bernardo’s offensive edge (20 goals scored vs Sport’s 16) and the home 80% BTTS trend, I tip BTTS - Yes (62% vs 38%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.52 expected goals for São Bernardo (xG_for 1.51 vs xG_against Sport 1.53) and 1.23 for Sport Recife (xG_for 1.07 vs xG_against São Bernardo 1.39), totaling 2.75 goals. São Bernardo averages 1.43 goals per game and records 5.57 SOT (13.86 shots overall), while Sport averages 1.2 goals and only 2.2 SOT, highlighting a clear home advantage in chance creation. Season metrics show São Bernardo with 86% of matches Over 1.5 goals versus Sport’s 40%, and the league averages 2.3 goals per game; combining this with xG=2.75 yields a high probability of Over 1.5 of roughly 76%. For the 2.5 line, despite seasonal Over 2.5 rates of 29% (São) and 40% (Sport), xG=2.75 raises the chance of Over 2.5 to about 52%, whereas Over 3.5 remains less likely (~30%) and conflicts with low seasonal 14–20% rates for that market. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, since the home side generates the most chances (5.57 SOT and xG 1.51) and Sport’s defense has xG_against 1.53, increasing the likelihood of at least 2 goals in the match.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A halftime draw is the natural scenario: São Bernardo were level at the break in 71% of their matches, and Sport Recife in 60%, with low first-half goal averages of 0.57 (home) and 0.8 (away) and mean goals by halftime of 0.29 vs 0.4. São Bernardo generate more offensive threat — xG 1.51 versus 1.07 and 5.57 shots on target against 2.2 — so they will be the initiative takers before the break, but the advantage in chances does not necessarily translate into a lead. Sport Recife, however, are more effective over the full match: 2.2 points per game versus the home side’s 1.71, 60% wins and 0% losses, with lower goals conceded 0.4 vs 0.86 and 60% clean sheets (vs 43%). As a result, the strongest signal is a halftime draw with an away win — X/2 (I assign 35%), with X/X (25%) as a realistic alternative due to São Bernardo’s offensive pressure. Overall the probability of a draw at halftime in the distribution is about 63%, which reflects the historical 71% and 60% HT draws for the two teams and translates into a higher chance of a turnaround by Sport Recife in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| São Bernardo | Sport Recife | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
São Bernardo is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - São Bernardo · 2 pts / match - Sport Recife
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
São Bernardo is 26% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - São Bernardo · 1.33 goals / match - Sport Recife
Sport Recife is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.83 goals / match - São Bernardo · 0.67 goals / match - Sport Recife
São Bernardo scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Sport Recife keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).
Sport Recife scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while São Bernardo keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - São Bernardo
Over / Under - Sport Recife
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sport Recife is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / match - São Bernardo · 1.17 pts / match - Sport Recife
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
São Bernardo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 58%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sport Recife - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
São Bernardo
Sport Recife
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| São Bernardo | Liga | Sport Recife | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.50 | 2.30 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 61% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of São Bernardo vs Sport Recife?
The Serie B match finished São Bernardo 0:0 Sport Recife. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before São Bernardo vs Sport Recife?
São Bernardo score 1.67 goals per game on average and Sport Recife 1.33. The Serie B average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 58% of São Bernardo's matches and 50% of Sport Recife's.
What form are São Bernardo and Sport Recife in?
Over the last 5 games São Bernardo have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Sport Recife 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for São Bernardo vs Sport Recife?
The statistical background for São Bernardo vs Sport Recife — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


