Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 23 July 2026

Sarıyer vs Amed: match statistics

Sarıyer crest
Sarıyer
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Amed crest
Amed
125%(3.80)
X20%(3.35)
255%(1.85)

Amed clearly outperforms Sarıyer in terms of form and quality. The visitors are ranked 3rd in the table with 15 wins this season, while the hosts sit in 15th place with just 9 victories. Amed demonstrates significantly better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per away match compared to the hosts' 0.83 at home. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.59 vs 1.38), confirming their advantage in creating chances. Sarıyer has a negative goal difference at home (-2) and loses 42% of their home matches, while Amed wins 42% of their away games with better overall form. The recent form of the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG for Amed vs 1.2 PPG for Sarıyer) and the advantage in ball possession (53% vs 48%) further justify tipping an away win.

Sarıyer vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sarıyer play Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 19 February 2026 at 11:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sarıyer: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sarıyer scores 1.16 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.92 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sarıyer 37%, Amed 55%. Over 2.5: Sarıyer 53%, Amed 58%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.39. Sarıyer: 11.6 shots per match, Amed: 15.5.

Match halves

Sarıyer: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.68. Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16.

Goals by minute

Sarıyer: 61-75 (11 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Amed clearly outperforms Sarıyer in terms of form and quality. The visitors are ranked 3rd in the table with 15 wins this season, while the hosts sit in 15th place with just 9 victories. Amed demonstrates significantly better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per away match compared to the hosts' 0.83 at home. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.59 vs 1.38), confirming their advantage in creating chances. Sarıyer has a negative goal difference at home (-2) and loses 42% of their home matches, while Amed wins 42% of their away games with better overall form. The recent form of the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG for Amed vs 1.2 PPG for Sarıyer) and the advantage in ball possession (53% vs 48%) further justify tipping an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
SarıyerAmed
13Shots1
SarıyerAmed
6Shots on target0
SarıyerAmed
1.66xG0.27
SarıyerAmed
6Corners1
SarıyerAmed
59Dangerous attacks27
SarıyerAmed
12Fouls17
SarıyerAmed
1Cards5
SarıyerAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.16Goals scored / match2.13
SarıyerAmed
1.16Goals conceded / match1.11
SarıyerAmed
48%Average possession53%
SarıyerAmed
4.11Shots on target / match5.61
SarıyerAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.61Shots per match15.5
SarıyerAmed
4.11Shots on target5.61
SarıyerAmed
10%Shot conversion13.8%
SarıyerAmed
48%Possession53%
SarıyerAmed
1.39xG for1.71
SarıyerAmed
1.27xG against1.15
SarıyerAmed

Shooting quality

Sarıyer: BalancedAmed: Attacking
SarıyerAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sarıyer is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Sarıyer · 0.8 pts / match - Amed

Sarıyer
DWLWW
Season result split
39% W18% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-7-16
1.37 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-6
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Amed
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
55% W29% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-11-6
1.95 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-6-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 84% better for: goals scored per match.

1.16 goals / match - Sarıyer · 2.13 goals / match - Amed

Amed is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.16 goals / match - Sarıyer · 1.11 goals / match - Amed

Sarıyer scoring profile: strong

Sarıyer scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Sarıyer keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

44Goals scored (season)81
SarıyerAmed
44Goals conceded (season)42
SarıyerAmed
2.32Average goals in match3.24
SarıyerAmed
7Goals scored (last 5)7
SarıyerAmed
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
SarıyerAmed

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal84%
SarıyerAmed
24%2 goals58%
SarıyerAmed
18%3 goals29%
SarıyerAmed
5%4 goals18%
SarıyerAmed

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal66%
SarıyerAmed
39%2 goals32%
SarıyerAmed
13%3 goals11%
SarıyerAmed
3%4 goals3%
SarıyerAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time26%
SarıyerAmed
0%BTTS in both halves11%
SarıyerAmed
18%Scored in both halves37%
SarıyerAmed

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS42%
SarıyerAmed
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
SarıyerAmed
20%BTTS - last 580%
SarıyerAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
SarıyerAmed
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
SarıyerAmed
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
SarıyerAmed

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
SarıyerAmed
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
SarıyerAmed
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
SarıyerAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Sarıyer · 1.71 pts / match - Amed

Sarıyer - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
Amed - half-time state
42% leading45% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.71
SarıyerAmed
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.97
SarıyerAmed
0.45Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
SarıyerAmed
0.92Average goals (1st half)1.45
SarıyerAmed
63%Clean sheet before half-time63%
SarıyerAmed
68%No goal before half-time42%
SarıyerAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.71
SarıyerAmed
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)1.16
SarıyerAmed
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
SarıyerAmed
1.39Average goals (2nd half)1.79
SarıyerAmed
55%Clean sheet after half-time53%
SarıyerAmed
47%No goal after half-time37%
SarıyerAmed

Sarıyer - second-half results

42% W24% R34% P
45
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - second-half results

47% W29% R24% P
65
Half-time points
37
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
65
Second-half points
+20
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sarıyer - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sarıyer
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
8
4
16-30
4
8
31-45
5
7
46-60
11
5
61-75
10
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
12
7
16-30
18
8
31-45
16
2
46-60
9
9
61-75
19
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sarıyer

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
170%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

SarıyerLigaAmed
Average goals in match 2.322.92 3.24
Both teams scored 37%50% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%54% 58%
Clean sheets 39%29% 34%
Goal before half-time 61%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 84%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.92
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sarıyer 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
2 : 0
Sarıyer Spor Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Sarıyer vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Sarıyer 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sarıyer vs Amed?

Sarıyer score 1.16 goals per game on average and Amed 2.13. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 37% of Sarıyer's matches and 55% of Amed's.

What form are Sarıyer and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Sarıyer have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Amed 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sarıyer vs Amed?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sarıyer vs Amed: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.