Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 12 September 2026

Sarıyer vs Amed: match statistics

Sarıyer crest
Sarıyer
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Amed crest
Amed
125%(3.80)
X20%(3.35)
255%(1.85)

Amed clearly outperforms Sarıyer in terms of form and quality. The visitors are ranked 3rd in the table with 15 wins this season, while the hosts sit in 15th place with just 9 victories. Amed demonstrates significantly better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per away match compared to the hosts' 0.83 at home. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.59 vs 1.38), confirming their advantage in creating chances. Sarıyer has a negative goal difference at home (-2) and loses 42% of their home matches, while Amed wins 42% of their away games with better overall form. The recent form of the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG for Amed vs 1.2 PPG for Sarıyer) and the advantage in ball possession (53% vs 48%) further justify tipping an away win.

Sarıyer vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sarıyer played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 19 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Sarıyer: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Amed: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sarıyer scores 0.96 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Amed scores 2.16 and concedes 1.16. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sarıyer 40%, Amed 56%. Over 2.5: Sarıyer 52%, Amed 64%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.35. Sarıyer: 11.2 shots per match, Amed: 15.6.

Match halves

Sarıyer: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.64. Amed: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Sarıyer: 61-75 (6 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Amed clearly outperforms Sarıyer in terms of form and quality. The visitors are ranked 3rd in the table with 15 wins this season, while the hosts sit in 15th place with just 9 victories. Amed demonstrates significantly better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.83 goals per away match compared to the hosts' 0.83 at home. The xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.59 vs 1.38), confirming their advantage in creating chances. Sarıyer has a negative goal difference at home (-2) and loses 42% of their home matches, while Amed wins 42% of their away games with better overall form. The recent form of the last 5 matches (1.6 PPG for Amed vs 1.2 PPG for Sarıyer) and the advantage in ball possession (53% vs 48%) further justify tipping an away win.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
SarıyerAmed
13Shots1
SarıyerAmed
6Shots on target0
SarıyerAmed
1.66xG0.27
SarıyerAmed
6Corners1
SarıyerAmed
59Dangerous attacks27
SarıyerAmed
12Fouls17
SarıyerAmed
1Cards5
SarıyerAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.96Goals scored / match2.16
SarıyerAmed
1.36Goals conceded / match1.16
SarıyerAmed
48%Average possession53%
SarıyerAmed
3.8Shots on target / match5.76
SarıyerAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.16Shots per match15.64
SarıyerAmed
3.8Shots on target5.76
SarıyerAmed
8.6%Shot conversion13.8%
SarıyerAmed
48%Possession53%
SarıyerAmed
1.35xG for1.71
SarıyerAmed
1.37xG against1.16
SarıyerAmed

Shooting quality

Sarıyer: BalancedAmed: Attacking
SarıyerAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Sarıyer · 1.6 pts / match - Amed

Sarıyer
WLLWL
Season result split
36% W12% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-13
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Amed
LDWWD
Season result split
60% W20% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-5
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 125% better for: goals scored per match.

0.96 goals / match - Sarıyer · 2.16 goals / match - Amed

Amed is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Sarıyer · 1.16 goals / match - Amed

Sarıyer scoring profile: strong

Sarıyer scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).

Amed scoring profile: very strong

Amed scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Sarıyer keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

24Goals scored (season)54
SarıyerAmed
34Goals conceded (season)29
SarıyerAmed
2.32Average goals in match3.32
SarıyerAmed
4Goals scored (last 5)11
SarıyerAmed
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
SarıyerAmed

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal80%
SarıyerAmed
20%2 goals60%
SarıyerAmed
12%3 goals28%
SarıyerAmed
0%4 goals20%
SarıyerAmed

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal68%
SarıyerAmed
48%2 goals32%
SarıyerAmed
12%3 goals12%
SarıyerAmed
4%4 goals4%
SarıyerAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time28%
SarıyerAmed
0%BTTS in both halves8%
SarıyerAmed
16%Scored in both halves36%
SarıyerAmed

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
SarıyerAmed
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
SarıyerAmed
40%BTTS - last 540%
SarıyerAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
SarıyerAmed
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
SarıyerAmed
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
SarıyerAmed

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
SarıyerAmed
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
SarıyerAmed
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
SarıyerAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 72% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Sarıyer · 1.72 pts / match - Amed

Sarıyer - half-time state
16% leading52% draw32% trailing
Amed - half-time state
44% leading40% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.72
SarıyerAmed
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.96
SarıyerAmed
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
SarıyerAmed
0.84Average goals (1st half)1.48
SarıyerAmed
56%Clean sheet before half-time60%
SarıyerAmed
72%No goal before half-time40%
SarıyerAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per match (2nd half)1.64
SarıyerAmed
0.64Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
SarıyerAmed
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
SarıyerAmed
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.84
SarıyerAmed
44%Clean sheet after half-time56%
SarıyerAmed
48%No goal after half-time44%
SarıyerAmed

Sarıyer - second-half results

36% W20% D44% L
25
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding225%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Amed - second-half results

44% W32% D24% L
43
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.72
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sarıyer - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sarıyer
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
7
31-45
4
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Amed
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
6
5
16-30
13
7
31-45
11
1
46-60
5
7
61-75
14
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.82
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-29%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sarıyer

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

SarıyerLigaAmed
Average goals in match 2.322.96 3.32
Both teams scored 40%52% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%55% 64%
Clean sheets 28%28% 32%
Goal before half-time 60%73% 72%
Goal after half-time 92%81% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AmedYellow cardMbaye Diagne
  2. AmedYellow cardHasan Ali Kaldırım
  3. AmedSubstitutionOn: Dia Sabi'AOff: Florent Hasani
  4. AmedYellow cardHasan Ali Kaldırım
  5. AmedSubstitutionOn: Celal HanalpOff: Zdravko Minchev Dimitrov
  6. SarıyerSubstitutionOn: Aytaç KaraOff: Hasan Emre Yeşilyurt
  7. SarıyerSubstitutionOn: Papis Malaly DembéléOff: Enver Kulašin
  8. AmedSubstitutionOn: Cem ÜstündagOff: Daniel Moreno Mosquera
  9. AmedYellow cardErce Kardeşler
  10. SarıyerGoalEmeka Friday Eze
  11. SarıyerYellow cardEmeka Friday Eze
  12. AmedYellow cardOleksandr Syrota

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sarıyer 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Amed Sportif Faaliyetler Kulübü
2 : 0
Sarıyer Spor Kulübü

FAQ

What was the result of Sarıyer vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Sarıyer 1:1 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sarıyer vs Amed?

Sarıyer score 0.96 goals per game on average and Amed 2.16. The 1. Lig average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Sarıyer's matches and 56% of Amed's.

What form are Sarıyer and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Sarıyer have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Amed 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sarıyer vs Amed?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sarıyer vs Amed: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.