Argentina - Primera DivisiónData current as of 20 July 2026

Sarmiento vs Banfield: match statistics

Sarmiento crest
Sarmiento
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Banfield crest
Banfield
135%(2.90)
X35%(2.80)
230%(2.80)

Analysis of the statistics indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable result. Sarmiento has earned 4 points (1.0 PPG) in the last five matches with a record of 1-2-2, while Banfield shows slightly better form with 8 points (1.6 PPG) and a record of 2-2-1. Both teams have an identical goal difference in the last five meetings (4-5 for Sarmiento, 6-5 for Banfield), evidencing similar offensive and defensive efficiency. In the current season, the hosts recorded one loss without scoring, while the visitors drew 1:1, confirming the level playing field. The lack of detailed home and away statistics hinders a more precise forecast, however, the form of recent matches and the minimal advantage of the visitors in points per game make a draw seem the safest tip with a slight chance of victory for either side.

Sarmiento vs Banfield: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sarmiento play Banfield in Primera División (Argentina). The match date is 30 January 2026 at 01:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Sarmiento: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Banfield: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sarmiento scores 0.81 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Banfield scores 1.06 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sarmiento 38%, Banfield 50%. Over 2.5: Sarmiento 44%, Banfield 44%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Banfield has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.23. Sarmiento: 9.9 shots per match, Banfield: 11.9.

Match halves

Sarmiento: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.31. Banfield: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Sarmiento: 31-45+ (4 goals). Banfield: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Primera División: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Analysis of the statistics indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most probable result. Sarmiento has earned 4 points (1.0 PPG) in the last five matches with a record of 1-2-2, while Banfield shows slightly better form with 8 points (1.6 PPG) and a record of 2-2-1. Both teams have an identical goal difference in the last five meetings (4-5 for Sarmiento, 6-5 for Banfield), evidencing similar offensive and defensive efficiency. In the current season, the hosts recorded one loss without scoring, while the visitors drew 1:1, confirming the level playing field. The lack of detailed home and away statistics hinders a more precise forecast, however, the form of recent matches and the minimal advantage of the visitors in points per game make a draw seem the safest tip with a slight chance of victory for either side.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
SarmientoBanfield
23Shots9
SarmientoBanfield
9Shots on target2
SarmientoBanfield
2.5xG1.04
SarmientoBanfield
9Corners2
SarmientoBanfield
59Dangerous attacks45
SarmientoBanfield
13Fouls17
SarmientoBanfield
4Cards4
SarmientoBanfield

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.81Goals scored / match1.06
SarmientoBanfield
1.25Goals conceded / match1.19
SarmientoBanfield
48%Average possession41%
SarmientoBanfield
3.56Shots on target / match3.63
SarmientoBanfield

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.94Shots per match11.94
SarmientoBanfield
3.56Shots on target3.63
SarmientoBanfield
8.2%Shot conversion8.9%
SarmientoBanfield
48%Possession41%
SarmientoBanfield
1.23xG for1.37
SarmientoBanfield
1.75xG against1.85
SarmientoBanfield

Shooting quality

Sarmiento: BalancedBanfield: Balanced
SarmientoBanfield
Accuracy (shots on target)36%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sarmiento is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Sarmiento · 1 pts / match - Banfield

Sarmiento
WLLWL
Season result split
38% W6% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-9
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Banfield
LLDDW
Season result split
31% W19% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-8
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Banfield is 31% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Sarmiento · 1.06 goals / match - Banfield

Banfield is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Sarmiento · 1.19 goals / match - Banfield

Sarmiento scoring profile: strong

Sarmiento scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Banfield scoring profile: strong

Banfield scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while Sarmiento keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

13Goals scored (season)17
SarmientoBanfield
20Goals conceded (season)19
SarmientoBanfield
2.06Average goals in match2.25
SarmientoBanfield
5Goals scored (last 5)5
SarmientoBanfield
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
SarmientoBanfield

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal69%
SarmientoBanfield
19%2 goals31%
SarmientoBanfield
0%3 goals6%
SarmientoBanfield
0%4 goals0%
SarmientoBanfield

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
SarmientoBanfield
38%2 goals31%
SarmientoBanfield
13%3 goals13%
SarmientoBanfield
6%4 goals0%
SarmientoBanfield

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time19%
SarmientoBanfield
0%BTTS in both halves6%
SarmientoBanfield
6%Scored in both halves19%
SarmientoBanfield

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
SarmientoBanfield
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
SarmientoBanfield
60%BTTS - last 560%
SarmientoBanfield

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
SarmientoBanfield
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
SarmientoBanfield
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
SarmientoBanfield

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
SarmientoBanfield
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
SarmientoBanfield
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
SarmientoBanfield

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sarmiento is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - Sarmiento · 1.06 pts / match - Banfield

Sarmiento - half-time state
38% leading25% draw38% trailing
Banfield - half-time state
19% leading50% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.06
SarmientoBanfield
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.38
SarmientoBanfield
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
SarmientoBanfield
1Average goals (1st half)1
SarmientoBanfield
63%Clean sheet before half-time56%
SarmientoBanfield
63%No goal before half-time63%
SarmientoBanfield

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)1.38
SarmientoBanfield
0.31Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
SarmientoBanfield
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
SarmientoBanfield
1.06Average goals (2nd half)1.25
SarmientoBanfield
31%Clean sheet after half-time56%
SarmientoBanfield
69%No goal after half-time50%
SarmientoBanfield

Sarmiento - second-half results

6% W50% R44% P
22
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Banfield - second-half results

31% W44% R25% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Sarmiento - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.60
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Banfield - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sarmiento
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
4
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Banfield
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sarmiento

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
139%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Banfield

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

SarmientoLigaBanfield
Average goals in match 2.062.08 2.25
Both teams scored 38%45% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%34% 44%
Clean sheets 31%34% 25%
Goal before half-time 75%61% 63%
Goal after half-time 75%71% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sarmiento 0 - 0 - 1 Banfield. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

CA Banfield
2 : 0
CA Sarmiento

FAQ

What was the result of Sarmiento vs Banfield?

The Primera División match finished Sarmiento 1:0 Banfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sarmiento vs Banfield?

Sarmiento score 0.81 goals per game on average and Banfield 1.06. The Primera División average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Sarmiento's matches and 50% of Banfield's.

What form are Sarmiento and Banfield in?

Over the last 5 games Sarmiento have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Banfield 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sarmiento vs Banfield?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.