United States - MLSLumen FieldData current as of 30 August 2026

Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seattle Sounders played Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Lumen Field. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Seattle Sounders: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Chicago Fire: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seattle Sounders scores 1.10 and concedes 1.35 goals per match. Chicago Fire scores 1.85 and concedes 1.30. League average: 3.19 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seattle Sounders 55%, Chicago Fire 70%. Over 2.5: Seattle Sounders 40%, Chicago Fire 75%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Chicago Fire has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.52. Seattle Sounders: 12.9 shots per match, Chicago Fire: 13.6.

Match halves

Seattle Sounders: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.60. Chicago Fire: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Seattle Sounders: 76-90+ (7 goals). Chicago Fire: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire come into this game in excellent form: they have collected 13 points from their last five matches, winning 4 and drawing 1, while Seattle have managed just 4 points and suffered three defeats. During this period, the visitors scored 10 goals and conceded 5, whereas the hosts netted 6 and allowed their opponents to score 7. Over the course of the season, Chicago have a clearly superior record, with 11 wins and 37 goals compared with Seattle’s 7 victories and 22 goals. Away from home, Fire average 1.70 goals per match and convert 16% of their shots, while the Sounders’ home defence concedes as many as 1.78 goals per game. Seattle do create more high-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.74 compared with Chicago’s 1.30 away from home, but their poor current form and just 11% of home matches without conceding point towards the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is clear, as BTTS occurred in 60% of Seattle’s matches and as many as 80% of Chicago’s, compared with the league average of 63%. Chicago averages 1.7 goals per match and scored 2.0 goals per game across its last five outings, while Seattle allowed opponents an xG of 1.97 and conceded an average of 1.4 goals during that period. The hosts have failed to score in none of their matches this season, and their average of 2.0 goals scored and xG of 1.76 align well with Chicago’s defence, which concedes 1.5 goals on average and keeps a clean sheet in only 20% of matches. Seattle does have a 40% clean-sheet rate across the season, but Chicago recorded BTTS in 100% of its last five matches, significantly reducing the likelihood of a scenario in which one team fails to score. BTTS - Yes is therefore the most probable outcome, although Seattle’s relatively solid defence over the course of the season remains a risk.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seattle score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Chicago concede 1.5 goals away from home, with the hosts generating an average of 1.76 xG compared to the 1.60 xG allowed by their opponents. Chicago are in excellent attacking form: they have scored 2.0 goals per game across their last five matches, while the Over 2.5 goals line was cleared in 60% and 80% of their games, respectively. At least two goals were scored in 80% of Seattle’s matches and 90% of Chicago’s, while the league average stands at a high 3.19 goals. The visitors have scored in 90% of their matches, while Seattle have allowed as much as 1.97 xG per game over their last five fixtures, increasing the likelihood of a Chicago goal. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as it combines the high consistency of both attacks with clearly favorable goal-scoring and chance-quality metrics.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Chicago are showing significantly better current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, remain unbeaten, and have averaged 2.0 goals scored, while Seattle have lost 3 of their 5 games and scored just 1.2 goals per match. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their last five appearances, and over the entire period analysed they were ahead at half-time in 50% of matches, compared with 40% for Seattle. Their defence is currently stable before the interval, conceding just 0.2 goals on average in the first half over their last five matches, identical to the hosts’ figure, which increases the likelihood of holding onto any potential lead. Seattle have better seasonal home metrics, including a 70% win rate and an xG of 1.76, but their current form and average of 1.2 goals conceded after the break suggest that Chicago could take the lead and see the game out.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
11Shots20
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
3Shots on target11
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.25xG2.47
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
4Corners7
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
47Dangerous attacks61
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
9Fouls9
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1Cards0
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.1Goals scored / match1.85
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.35Goals conceded / match1.3
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
51%Average possession51%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
4.7Shots on target / match4.95
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.95Shots per match13.55
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
4.7Shots on target4.95
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
8.5%Shot conversion13.7%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
51%Possession51%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.52xG for1.53
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.6xG against1.4
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Seattle Sounders: BalancedChicago Fire: Efficient finishing
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire is 900% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Seattle Sounders · 2 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Seattle Sounders
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W20% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-9
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Chicago Fire
LWWWD
Season result split
55% W15% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-6
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 68% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Seattle Sounders · 1.85 goals / match - Chicago Fire

Seattle Sounders scoring profile: very strong

Seattle Sounders scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 95% of matches (19 of 20 matches), while Seattle Sounders keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

22Goals scored (season)37
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
27Goals conceded (season)26
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
2.45Average goals in match3.15
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal95%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
20%2 goals60%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
10%3 goals20%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
5%4 goals5%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal70%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
40%2 goals35%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
10%3 goals25%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
5%4 goals0%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
Seattle Sounders - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 20 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time35%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
5%BTTS in both halves10%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
15%Scored in both halves40%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Seattle Sounders · 1.75 pts / match - Chicago Fire

Seattle Sounders - half-time state
20% leading50% draw30% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
45% leading40% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.75
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.5
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
45%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
60%No goal before half-time25%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
50%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire
50%No goal after half-time40%
Seattle SoundersChicago Fire

Seattle Sounders - second-half results

35% W30% R35% P
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

35% W25% R40% P
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seattle Sounders - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Chicago Fire - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seattle Sounders
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
6
16-30
2
3
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
8
4
16-30
4
7
31-45
3
3
46-60
9
1
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seattle Sounders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
136%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Seattle SoundersLigaChicago Fire
Average goals in match 2.453.19 3.15
Both teams scored 55%63% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%61% 75%
Clean sheets 25%20% 30%
Goal before half-time 70%77% 85%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Seattle SoundersGoalDejan JoveljićAssist: Sebastian Gomez
  2. Seattle SoundersGoalDejan JoveljićAssist: Albert Rusnák
  3. Seattle SoundersYellow cardSnyder Brunell
  4. Seattle SoundersSubstitutionOn: Cristian Roldu00e1nOff: Snyder Brunell
  5. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Puso DithejaneOff: Robin Lod
  6. Seattle SoundersSubstitutionOn: Hassani DotsonOff: Alexander Roldan
  7. Seattle SoundersSubstitutionOn: Jordan Perry MorrisOff: Sebastian Gomez
  8. Chicago FireGoalRobert LewandowskiAssist: Puso Dithejane

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished Seattle Sounders 2:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire?

Seattle Sounders score 1.10 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.85. The MLS average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Seattle Sounders's matches and 70% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are Seattle Sounders and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games Seattle Sounders have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire?

The statistical background for Seattle Sounders vs Chicago Fire — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.