United States - MLSData current as of 08 September 2026

Seattle Sounders vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Seattle Sounders vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seattle Sounders played SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Seattle Sounders: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. SJ Earthquakes: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seattle Sounders scores 1.40 and concedes 0.60 goals per match. SJ Earthquakes scores 2.25 and concedes 0.67. League average: 3.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seattle Sounders 50%, SJ Earthquakes 50%. Over 2.5: Seattle Sounders 30%, SJ Earthquakes 50%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

SJ Earthquakes has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.60. Seattle Sounders: 13.4 shots per match, SJ Earthquakes: 14.7.

Match halves

Seattle Sounders: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.70. SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

Seattle Sounders: 0-15 (3 goals). SJ Earthquakes: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.26 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

San Jose Earthquakes appear to be the favorites for this match based on superior goal output and number of wins: they have 9 wins and 27 goals scored (away), whereas Seattle at home has 6 wins and 14 goals. Seattle, however, generates more quality chances at their stadium — average xG at home is 1.80 with 15.75 shots and 6.25 on target, translating to 2.25 goals per game, but their conversion is only 14%. San Jose, by contrast, averages 2.17 goals on the road with a lower xG of 1.10 and fewer shots (9.17 and 3.5 on target), indicating high efficiency (conversion 24%). Defensively the teams are similar — Seattle concedes 0.75 goals at home on average, San Jose 0.83 away, with the hosts having conceded 5 goals in the last 5 matches and San Jose 7. Considering the visitors' efficiency advantage (24% vs 14%) and higher aggregate wins and goals (9 and 27 vs 6 and 14), I forecast a San Jose victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

My pick is BTTS - Yes — the key signal is that both teams have had BTTS in the last 5 matches at 100% (5/5), while the league BTTS rate is 59%. Seattle at home has a seasonal BTTS of only 33% and 50% clean sheets with an average of 0.5 goals conceded, yet they produce a high xG of 2.14 and average 7.83 shots on target, which favors scoring. San Jose away has 67% BTTS, scored 27 goals this season and in the last 5 matches averages 2.8 goals, while with an average of 3.5 shots on target they maintain a 24% conversion. xG comparison shows Seattle xG_for 2.14 versus SJ xG_against 1.51, suggesting goals for the hosts, and SJ xG_for 1.1 versus Seattle xG_against 0.92 gives the visitors a realistic scoring chance. Considering the dominant recent 5-match trend (100% BTTS), high SJ away BTTS (67%) and the league value 59%, I assess the probability of BTTS at about 70% versus 30% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and recent form predicts a total goals figure of approximately 2.84 (expected_goals_home = 1.83 for Seattle, expected_goals_away = 1.01 for San Jose). Seattle averages 2.33 goals per game and has an xG of 2.14 with just 0.50 goals conceded this season, while San Jose scores 2.17 with an xG of 1.10 and concedes 0.83; the hosts average 20.17 shots (7.83 on target) versus San Jose’s 9.17 (3.5 on target), which increases Seattle’s chance creation. In the last 5 matches Seattle averaged 2.2 goals, San Jose 2.8 goals, and the share of over 2.5 games in the last 5 is 60% for both, raising the likelihood of a result above 2.5. A Poisson with λ=2.84 yields approximate probabilities: over 1.5 ≈77.5%, over 2.5 ≈53.9% and over 3.5 ≈31.6% – rounded to 78%, 54% and 32%. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (Seattle has 83% of matches over 1.5, San Jose 67%), while Over 2.5 is moderately likely and Over 3.5 is too risky.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seattle led at the break in 4 matches (67%), averaging 1.17 goals by half-time and conceding 0.33, while San Jose led in 2 games (33%) with an average of 0.67 goals at the break. Over the season Seattle averages 2.33 goals scored and 0.50 conceded, and San Jose 2.17 scored and 0.83 conceded; the home side’s xG advantage 2.14 versus 1.10 and superiority in shots 20.17 vs 9.17 and shots on target 7.83 vs 3.5 confirm better chance creation by Seattle. The away side has a higher shooting efficiency, 24% versus the home 12%, but attempts far fewer shots, so despite San Jose’s good conversion the home team generates more opportunities. Seattle keeps a clean sheet in 50% of home matches, and San Jose records BTTS in 67% of games, which is a mixed signal but does not negate the home advantage. Considering the frequency of leading at the break (67%), the xG and SOT advantages, the strongest scenario is Seattle leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
23Shots11
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
9Shots on target3
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
2.53xG1.12
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
9Corners6
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
63Dangerous attacks30
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
12Fouls11
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0Cards2
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
1.4Goals scored / match2.25
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0.6Goals conceded / match0.67
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
52%Average possession48%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
5.3Shots on target / match5.67
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.4Shots per match14.67
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
5.3Shots on target5.67
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
10.4%Shot conversion15.3%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
52%Possession48%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
1.6xG for1.62
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
1.49xG against1.22
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Seattle Sounders: BalancedSJ Earthquakes: Attacking
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seattle Sounders
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W30% R10% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-1
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
SJ Earthquakes
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W17% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-1
2.42 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Seattle Sounders · 2.25 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Seattle Sounders is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.6 goals / match - Seattle Sounders · 0.67 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Seattle Sounders scoring profile: very strong

Seattle Sounders scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 matches).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 92% of matches (11 of 12 matches), while Seattle Sounders keeps a clean sheet in 50% (5 of 10 matches).

14Goals scored (season)27
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
6Goals conceded (season)8
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
2Average goals in match2.92
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
9Goals scored (last 5)14
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal92%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
30%2 goals58%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
10%3 goals50%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
10%4 goals17%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal58%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
10%2 goals8%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0%3 goals0%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0%4 goals0%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time17%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
20%Scored in both halves33%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJ Earthquakes is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Seattle Sounders · 1.83 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Seattle Sounders - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
50% leading33% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)1.83
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.92
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.25
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
60%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
50%No goal before half-time33%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.92
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
0.9Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
80%Clean sheet after half-time75%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes
40%No goal after half-time42%
Seattle SoundersSJ Earthquakes

Seattle Sounders - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

50% W42% R8% P
22
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seattle Sounders - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.62.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.03.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seattle Sounders
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
1
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
0
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
7
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
75%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seattle Sounders

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.89
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Seattle SoundersLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals in match 2.003.26 2.92
Both teams scored 50%60% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 30%63% 50%
Clean sheets 50%22% 42%
Goal before half-time 70%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 60%79% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.26
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJ EarthquakesGoalNick FernandezAssist: Nonso Adimabua
  2. Seattle SoundersGoalAlbert Rusnák
  3. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardReid Roberts
  4. SJ EarthquakesYellow cardPreston Judd
  5. SJ EarthquakesSubstitutionOn: Jamar RickettsOff: Jack Skahan
  6. SJ EarthquakesGoalPreston Judd
  7. Seattle SoundersSubstitutionOn: Paul Joseph Arriola HendricksOff: Paul Rothrock
  8. Seattle SoundersGoalOsaze De RosarioAssist: Nouhou Tolo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filip DujicMatches officiated: 8
4.88Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins38%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Seattle Sounders 1 - 0 - 0 SJ Earthquakes. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Seattle Sounders vs SJ Earthquakes?

The MLS match finished Seattle Sounders 3:2 SJ Earthquakes. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Seattle Sounders vs SJ Earthquakes?

Seattle Sounders score 1.40 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 2.25. The MLS average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Seattle Sounders's matches and 50% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Seattle Sounders and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Seattle Sounders have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seattle Sounders vs SJ Earthquakes?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Seattle Sounders vs SJ Earthquakes: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.