South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics

Seongnam crest
Seongnam
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners

Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seongnam played Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Seongnam: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Ansan Greeners: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seongnam scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 1.50 and concedes 1.83. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seongnam 80%, Ansan Greeners 100%. Over 2.5: Seongnam 60%, Ansan Greeners 67%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

xG, shots and style

Ansan Greeners has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.10. Seongnam: 7.4 shots per match, Ansan Greeners: 10.2.

Match halves

Seongnam: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.40. Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Seongnam: 16-30 (3 goals). Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 61%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back Seongnam to win (1): the hosts remain unbeaten at home (0% defeats) and average 1.33 goals scored and 1.00 conceded in home matches, with an average xG of 1.17 and 55% possession. In their last 5 games Seongnam earns 1.8 points per match (form ddwdw: 2 wins and 3 draws), while Ansan has just 0.4 points per match over their last five (form llddl) and has failed to win any. Visitors create a lot on the road (avg. 13 shots and 7 on target with 19% conversion), translating to 2.5 goals per match and xG 1.58, but they have conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches versus 5 conceded by Seongnam. The hosts’ key advantages are defensive stability, superior form (1.8 vs 0.4 points per match) and game control; I assign a 60% probability to a Seongnam win, 25% to a draw and 15% to an Ansan victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have BTTS at 100% this season; in the last 5 matches Seongnam has 80% and Ansan 100%, while the league average BTTS is 65%. Seongnam scores on average 1.0 and concedes 2.25 per match, and Ansan scores 2.5 and concedes 1.0, so Ansan shows clear attacking strength against a vulnerable Seongnam defense. In xG Ansan has 1.58 vs 1.18 for Seongnam, and xG against is 2.06 for Seongnam and 1.69 for Ansan, which confirms goal risk for both sides. Additionally Ansan averages 7.0 shots on target vs 3.75 for Seongnam and has a higher conversion rate 19% vs 11%, and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season. Considering these numbers and the lack of clean sheets, I assess BTTS probability at 90% vs 10% and tip 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

My goals projection is based on xG: Seongnam has xG_for 1.18 while Ansan’s defense concedes xG_against 1.69, yielding home side ≈(1.18+1.69)/2 = 1.44 goals. Ansan posts xG_for 1.58 against a weak Seongnam defense (xG_against 2.06), giving ≈1.82 goals for the visitors — total ≈3.26 goals. Both teams have 100% of season matches with over 1.5 goals and 100% of matches where both teams scored, which strongly favors Over 1.5. Additionally, Ansan averages 7.0 shots on target and 13.0 total shots with a 19% conversion versus Seongnam’s 3.75 on target and 8.75 total shots with 11% conversion, so the visitors have greater scoring potential. Season Over 2.5 rates are 75% for Seongnam and 50% for Ansan (league 63%), and the expected combined ≈3.26 goals provides solid support for Over 2.5 (I estimate >60%). The strongest and most unambiguous signal from the data, however, is Over 1.5 (100% for both teams), therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the best line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seongnam often takes the lead at the break: in the last 5 matches they led at half-time in 60% of cases and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time, whereas Ansan led only in 20% and averaged 0.8 goals before the break. Ansan, however, is stronger after the break — they average 2.0 goals in second halves and have a +4 goal differential in those periods, while Seongnam has a -4 differential and concedes on average 1.25 goals after the break, including as many as 5 goals in minutes 76–90. The quality gap is confirmed by xG of 1.58 for Ansan versus 1.18 for Seongnam, more shots (13.0 vs 8.75) and higher conversion rate (19% vs 11%), and the visitors win 50% of matches with an average 2.0 points per game versus 0.25 for the hosts. Both teams score in 100% of their season matches, which increases the likelihood of goals after the break and a turnaround scenario. Based on this data, the strongest signal is the HT/FT scenario Seongnam, Ansan (1/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

70Possession (%)30
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
24Shots5
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Shots on target1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
3.18xG0.54
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
10Corners0
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
154Dangerous attacks20
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
11Fouls9
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
2Cards1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.6Goals scored / match1.5
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1Goals conceded / match1.83
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
54%Average possession46%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.4Shots on target / match4.83
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.4Shots per match10.17
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.4Shots on target4.83
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
21.6%Shot conversion14.8%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
54%Possession46%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.1xG for1.31
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.18xG against1.94
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Shooting quality

Seongnam: Efficient finishingAnsan Greeners: Counter-attacking
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
Accuracy (shots on target)32%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.670.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seongnam is 350% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.4 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W60% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ansan Greeners
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 2.04BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seongnam is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Seongnam · 1.5 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Seongnam · 1.83 goals / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam scoring profile: very strong

Seongnam scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)9
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
5Goals conceded (season)11
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
2.6Average goals in match3.33
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
8Goals scored (last 5)5
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal100%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
60%2 goals17%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
20%3 goals17%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%4 goals17%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
20%2 goals50%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%3 goals33%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%4 goals0%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time50%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
40%Scored in both halves0%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
80%BTTS - last 5100%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seongnam is 165% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.83 pts / match - Ansan Greeners

Seongnam - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Ansan Greeners - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per match (1st half)0.83
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.2Goals scored (1st half)0.67
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.67
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
60%Clean sheet before half-time17%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
20%No goal before half-time33%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)1
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
1Average goals (2nd half)1.67
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
40%Clean sheet after half-time67%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners
60%No goal after half-time67%
SeongnamAnsan Greeners

Seongnam - second-half results

0% W80% D20% L
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 40%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

17% W50% D33% L
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seongnam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.80
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seongnam
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
90%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
80%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

SeongnamLigaAnsan Greeners
Average goals in match 2.602.91 3.33
Both teams scored 80%63% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 67%
Clean sheets 20%22% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%83% 100%
Goal after half-time 60%70% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+-6%
Home attack advantage
+-6%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Rodrigo Luiz AngelottiOff: Seok-Ki Hwang
  2. Ansan GreenersGoalSeung-Woo RyuAssist: Jae-Hwan Lee
  3. SeongnamSubstitutionOn: Sang-Hyuk ParkOff: Jun-Sang Lee
  4. SeongnamYellow cardElionay Freitas da Silva
  5. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Dong-Hyun KangOff: Eung-Bin Yeon
  6. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Ho-jin JinOff: Hyun-Soo Jang
  7. SeongnamYellow cardSu-bin Park
  8. Ansan GreenersYellow cardMarlon Roberto dos Santos Bibiano

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Seongnam 2 - 0 - 1 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Seongnam FC
4 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
1 : 0
Seongnam FC
Seongnam FC
1 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 0:1 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Ansan Greeners?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 2, Ansan Greeners won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

Seongnam score 1.60 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.50. The K League 2 average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Seongnam's matches and 100% of Ansan Greeners's.

What form are Seongnam and Ansan Greeners in?

Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners?

The statistical background for Seongnam vs Ansan Greeners — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.