Seongnam vs Busan I'Park: match statistics
Seongnam vs Busan I'Park: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seongnam played Busan I'Park in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Seongnam Tancheon Sports Complex. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Seongnam: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Busan I'Park: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Busan I'Park scores 2.19 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seongnam 63%, Busan I'Park 75%. Over 2.5: Seongnam 38%, Busan I'Park 69%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Seongnam has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.49. Seongnam: 12.3 shots per match, Busan I'Park: 12.7.
Match halves
Seongnam: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Busan I'Park: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.19.
Goals by minute
Seongnam: 16-30 (4 goals). Busan I'Park: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-3-0. Average goals 1.25, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast an away win for Busan I'Park based on their offensive superiority: they have 11 wins this season and 35 goals scored versus Seongnam's 3 wins and 16 goals. In the last 5 matches Busan scored 15 goals and averaged 2.2 points per game, while Seongnam scored 5 goals and averages 1.0 point per game in that period. Away, Busan averages 2.25 goals per match with 0% goalless games, whereas Seongnam at home only averages 0.75 goals per match and has 50% goalless games, which strongly favors the visitors. Seongnam records higher possession at home (59%) and lower average goals conceded at home (0.88 vs. Busan’s 1.75 away), but their home xG of 1.68 versus actual 0.75 and low shot conversion (6% vs. Busan 17%) indicate significant finishing issues. Considering Busan’s higher conversion rate, more shots on target (4.63 vs. 3.75) and consistent scoring ability, I assign 65% probability to an away win, 20% to a draw and 15% to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A strong BTTS (Both Teams To Score) signal comes from Busan’s away stats — 88% of away matches with both teams scoring, versus Seongnam’s 63% BTTS at home and a league average of 63%. Busan averages 2.25 goals away and has 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per game), with away xG of 1.6 (last 5 matches xG 1.72), indicating a genuine scoring capability. Seongnam scores 2.13 goals at home on average and has xG 1.38, while conceding only 0.75 goals at home on the season, but conceding 1.2 goals per game in the last 5, which raises the risk of conceding against an attacking away side. Additionally, Seongnam have 38% clean sheets at home, whereas Busan kept a clean sheet away in only 13% of matches — this lowers the likelihood that either side keeps 0. Considering Busan’s high BTTS rate (88%), Seongnam’s solid 63% home BTTS and Busan’s attacking form (3.0 goals avg in last 5), I price BTTS at 80% (No BTTS 20%) and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal statistics indicate a high goal potential: home xG 1.38 versus xG against Busan 1.73 yields an expected ~1.56 goals for Seongnam, and away xG 1.60 versus xG against Seongnam 1.45 yields ~1.53 for Busan (sum ≈3.09). Across the season Seongnam averages 2.13 goals and Busan 2.25 per match (combined 4.38 by seasonal averages), and both teams have 88% of matches with over 1.5 goals, further supporting a high probability of over. A Poisson calculation with λ=3.09 gives roughly an 81% chance of more than 1.5 goals, ~60% for over 2.5 and ~37% for over 3.5, and Busan’s recent form (15 goals in 5 matches, 3.0 avg) increases the likelihood of a higher tally. Additionally BTTS is 63% for Seongnam and 88% for Busan, while clean sheets are 38% vs 13%, suggesting both sides are likely to score. Consequently the strongest and safest signal from the data is Over 1.5, with Over 2.5 as a secondary, moderately valuable option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seongnam presents a strong half-time signal: the hosts led at the break in 5 of 8 matches this season (63%) and average 1.13 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.38, translating into an average of 2.25 points gained by half-time. At home this season the hosts also register 2.5 points per match and a 75% win rate, versus 2.0 points and a 63% win rate for Busan, giving the hosts an advantage for the full-time result. Counterarguments are Busan’s form over the last 5 matches (3 wins and 2 draws, 60% wins), the visitors’ higher xG (1.60 vs 1.38) and their pronounced second-half activity (averaging 2.25 goals after the break versus the hosts’ 1.38), so I assign a meaningful weight to turnaround scenarios. Nonetheless, the strongest signal from the data remains Seongnam leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1), while accounting for the risk of a second-half comeback (hence larger weights for X/2 and 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seongnam | Busan I'Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Busan I'Park is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Seongnam · 1.6 pts / match - Busan I'Park
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Busan I'Park is 119% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Seongnam · 2.19 goals / match - Busan I'Park
Seongnam is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - Seongnam · 1.25 goals / match - Busan I'Park
Seongnam scores in 63% of matches (10 of 16 matches), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
Busan I'Park scores in 100% of matches (16 of 16 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seongnam
Over / Under - Busan I'Park
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Busan I'Park is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Seongnam · 1.94 pts / match - Busan I'Park
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Busan I'Park - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seongnam
Busan I'Park
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seongnam | Liga | Busan I'Park | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 2.79 | ▲ 3.44 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 57% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 22% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 73% | ▲ 94% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 76% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Seongnam 1 - 3 - 0 Busan I'Park. Average goals 1.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Seongnam vs Busan I'Park?
The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 1:0 Busan I'Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Busan I'Park?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 1, Busan I'Park won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Busan I'Park?
Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Busan I'Park 2.19. The K League 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Seongnam's matches and 75% of Busan I'Park's.
What form are Seongnam and Busan I'Park in?
Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Busan I'Park 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Busan I'Park?
The statistical background for Seongnam vs Busan I'Park — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


