Seongnam vs Gimhae City: match statistics
Seongnam vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seongnam played Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 5 June 2026. Venue: Seongnam Tancheon Sports Complex. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Seongnam: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Gimhae City: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seongnam scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.77 and concedes 2.23. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seongnam 62%, Gimhae City 69%. Over 2.5: Seongnam 38%, Gimhae City 62%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Seongnam has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.26. Seongnam: 11.2 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.6.
Match halves
Seongnam: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.46. Gimhae City: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Seongnam: 16-30 (3 goals). Gimhae City: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seongnam holds a clear statistical advantage: at home they have a record of 3 wins, 7 draws and 3 losses, while Gimhae away have only 1 win, 2 draws and 10 losses. The hosts have scored 13 goals this season and average 0.71 goals scored per home game with 0.86 conceded, whereas the visitors have 10 goals this season and on the road average 0.86 scored and 1.86 conceded per match. Seongnam generates better offensive opportunities – average home xG is 1.52 with 10.71 shots per game (3.29 on target), versus visitors’ away xG of 1.19 and 8.86 shots. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 4 goals each, but Seongnam has 1.2 points per game with a 1-3-1 record, while Gimhae have 0.6 points per game with a 1-0-4 record and 9 goals conceded in those five fixtures. Considering the higher xG (1.52 vs 1.19), superior home defense (0.86 vs 1.86 conceded) and the visitors’ poor form, I project a Seongnam victory, although the high rate of goalless home matches for the hosts (no goal in 57% of home games) increases the risk of a low-scoring game or draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high season BTTS rates: Seongnam 67% and Gimhae City 71%, averaging 69%, above the league benchmark of 62%. The hosts have zero clean sheets (0% clean) and concede 2.67 goals per game on average, while the visitors concede 1.86 goals per game, increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches both teams registered BTTS in 60% of games; across those five Seongnam scored 4 and conceded 5, and Gimhae City scored 4 and conceded 9, highlighting defensive vulnerabilities for both hosts and visitors. Despite low season goals scored averages (0.67 and 0.86), offensive xG stands at 1.3 for the hosts and 1.19 for the visitors with shot conversion rates of 6% and 10%, indicating chances are being created. I assign 74% to BTTS - Yes and 26% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams frequently score: Seongnam averages 0.67 goals and BTTS 67%, while Gimhae averages 0.86 goals and BTTS 71%, with matches over 1.5 goals at 83% (Seongnam) and 86% (Gimhae). Defenses are vulnerable — Seongnam concedes 2.67 goals/match, Gimhae 1.86, and xG against of 1.78 (Seongnam) and 1.75 (Gimhae), increasing the likelihood of goals from both sides. Attacking xG is 1.30 (Seongnam) and 1.19 (Gimhae), with average shots 10.5 vs 8.86; averaging attack xG and opponent xG yields ~1.525 for Seongnam ((1.30+1.75)/2) and ~1.485 for Gimhae ((1.19+1.78)/2). After adjusting for Seongnam’s low finishing (6% conversion) and recent form over the last 5 matches (last5 xG 1.46 vs 1.32), I project expected goals of ~1.45 for Seongnam and ~1.35 for Gimhae (total 2.80). Consequently the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (I recommend Over), with estimated probabilities over2.5 ≈68% (over1.5 ≈92%, over3.5 ≈31%), so the 2.5 line offers the best risk-reward balance.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seongnam have not won at home (winPercentage_home 0.0%) and concede an average of 2.67 goals per match, while Gimhae City have a 14.0% win rate and a season scoring average of 0.86. Seongnam were trailing at half-time in 4 of 6 matches (trailingAtHT_home = 4, trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 67%) and average just 0.33 goals scored by HT versus 0.83 conceded, increasing the likelihood that the visitors will lead after 45 minutes. xG is 1.30 for Seongnam versus 1.19 for Gimhae, but conversion rate is 6% for the home side versus 10% for the visitors, so Gimhae convert chances more efficiently. The second half produces goals — over 0.5 second-half goals occur for the home team in 83% and for the visitors in 100% of matches, therefore I forecast the visitors to maintain the lead and Gimhae to win (HT/FT 2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seongnam | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seongnam is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.6 pts / match - Gimhae City
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seongnam is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Seongnam · 0.77 goals / match - Gimhae City
Seongnam is 123% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Seongnam · 2.23 goals / match - Gimhae City
Seongnam scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
Gimhae City scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seongnam
Over / Under - Gimhae City
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 217% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / match - Seongnam · 0.46 pts / match - Gimhae City
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimhae City - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 8%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seongnam
Gimhae City
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seongnam | Liga | Gimhae City | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.71 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 62% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 55% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | • 23% | 24% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 73% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 75% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Seongnam vs Gimhae City?
The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 1:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Gimhae City?
Seongnam score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.77. The K League 2 average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Seongnam's matches and 69% of Gimhae City's.
What form are Seongnam and Gimhae City in?
Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimhae City 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Gimhae City?
The statistical background for Seongnam vs Gimhae City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.