Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics
Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seoul E-Land played Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 23 November 2025. Final score: 6:0.
Current form
Seoul E-Land: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Ansan Greeners: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seoul E-Land scores 1.53 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Ansan Greeners scores 0.66 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.52 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seoul E-Land 61%, Ansan Greeners 34%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 47%, Ansan Greeners 29%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.
xG, shots and style
Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.17. Seoul E-Land: 11.2 shots per match, Ansan Greeners: 9.6.
Match halves
Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.87. Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (17 goals). Ansan Greeners: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.52 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seoul E-Land | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seoul E-Land is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1 pts / match - Ansan Greeners
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 132% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 0.66 goals / match - Ansan Greeners
Seoul E-Land is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.42 goals / match - Ansan Greeners
Seoul E-Land scores in 79% of matches (30 of 38 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 26% (10 of 38 matches).
Ansan Greeners scores in 47% of matches (18 of 38 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 115% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 0.71 pts / match - Ansan Greeners
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seoul E-Land
Ansan Greeners
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seoul E-Land | Liga | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.66 | 2.52 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 50% | ▼ 34% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 47% | 46% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | • 29% | 30% | ▼ 26% |
| Goal before half-time | • 63% | 64% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 74% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Seoul E-Land 0 - 2 - 0 Ansan Greeners. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?
The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 6:0 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Ansan Greeners?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 0, Ansan Greeners won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?
Seoul E-Land score 1.53 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 0.66. The K League 2 average is 2.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 34% of Ansan Greeners's.
What form are Seoul E-Land and Ansan Greeners in?
Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.