South Korea - K League 2Mokdong StadiumData current as of 06 September 2026

Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju: match statistics

Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Cheongju crest
Cheongju

Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Seoul E-Land played Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 7 June 2026. Venue: Mokdong Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cheongju: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Seoul E-Land scores 1.71 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Cheongju scores 1.15 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Seoul E-Land 57%, Cheongju 77%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 71%, Cheongju 54%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.45. Seoul E-Land: 12.4 shots per match, Cheongju: 11.8.

Match halves

Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00. Cheongju: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (8 goals). Cheongju: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land are the favorites in this matchup: at home they average 2.00 goals per game with an average xG of 1.56 and have a 57% win rate at the stadium (home record 8-2-4 and goal difference +5 at home). Cheongju have no away wins (0 wins, 10 draws, 3 losses this season), score 1.33 goals per game with xG 1.27 and have conceded 20 goals this season compared to Seoul’s 16 conceded. Seoul generate more high-quality chances — 5.43 shots on target and 12.57 shots per game with a 16% conversion versus the visitors’ 4.17 on target and 10 shots with a 13% conversion — and at home they have not failed to score (0% of matches without scoring). Form also favors the hosts: Seoul in the last 5 matches have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (PPG 2.0), while Cheongju in their last 5 have 4 draws and 1 loss (PPG 0.8). Therefore I predict a Seoul E-Land win, although a draw (given the high number of draws in the visitors’ record) remains a realistic scenario.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes is more likely at approximately 82% versus 18% for No Goal. Key signal: very high home seasonal BTTS 86% and away 67% against a league average of 62%, indicating a tendency toward both teams scoring. Additionally, home clean sheets are only 14% vs 33% for the visitors, and seasonally they concede on average 1.71 goals per game (home) and 1.33 goals (away), so both teams regularly allow goals. Offensively, home xG is 1.60 with xG against 1.21, while away xG is 1.27 with xG against 1.22; in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60% and averaged 1.6 and 1.0 goals respectively, confirming they create chances. Similar numbers of shots on target (4.14 vs 4.17) and conversion rates of 8% vs 13% suggest that despite higher total shots for the home side (13.29 vs 10.0), both teams have a realistic chance to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model yields 1.41 expected goals for Seoul E-Land (xG attack 1.60 vs Cheongju xG defense 1.22) and 1.24 for Cheongju (xG attack 1.27 vs Seoul xG defense 1.21), totaling 2.65 goals. Season stats show Seoul at home have 86% of matches over 1.5 goals and Cheongju away 67%; the average of these is about 77%, hence I assign a 78% probability to Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, season values are 43% (Seoul) and 67% (Cheongju), averaging 55%; however Seoul’s last 5 matches show 80% Over 2.5 and the combined xG (2.65) is close to the league average of 2.7, so I rate Over 2.5 at 58%. The 3.5 line looks weaker — seasonally 29% for Seoul and 67% for Cheongju, but lack of consistent confirmation in recent games makes Over 3.5 less likely (35%) and Under 3.5 safer (65%). Additionally, the high percentage of BTTS matches (Seoul 86%, Cheongju 67%) and relatively high xG on both sides confirm that the strongest betting signal is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT scenario is a draw at the break and a draw at full-time (X/X), which I assign a 36% probability. This is based on Cheongju drawing 100% of their away matches (drawPercentage_away = 100.0) and Seoul E‑Land drawing 57% of their home matches (drawPercentage_home = 57.0), which increases the likelihood of a final draw. At half-time the home team records a draw in 71% of their home games (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 71.0), and the average goals by half are 1.14 for Seoul and 1.0 for Cheongju (AVGHT_home = 1.14, AVGHT_away = 1.0), so an HT draw is highly probable. Although xG favours Seoul (1.6 vs 1.27) and the hosts have better recent form in the last five matches (60% wins for Seoul vs 0% for the visitors), Seoul concedes many late goals (7 conceded in minutes 76–90) and concedes on average 1.14 goals in the second half (conceded_2hg_avg_home = 1.14), so I do not strongly back a home win. For that reason X/X is the strongest signal, while allowing for scenarios with second-half goals (e.g. X/2 = 5% and 2/2 = 11%) and a moderate chance of the hosts leading at the break and holding the lead (1/1 = 11%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Seoul E-LandCheongju
16Shots8
Seoul E-LandCheongju
6Shots on target5
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.84xG1.34
Seoul E-LandCheongju
5Corners4
Seoul E-LandCheongju
57Dangerous attacks65
Seoul E-LandCheongju
8Fouls4
Seoul E-LandCheongju
2Cards2
Seoul E-LandCheongju

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.71Goals scored / match1.15
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.14Goals conceded / match1.54
Seoul E-LandCheongju
50%Average possession53%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
5.07Shots on target / match4.15
Seoul E-LandCheongju

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.36Shots per match11.77
Seoul E-LandCheongju
5.07Shots on target4.15
Seoul E-LandCheongju
13.9%Shot conversion9.8%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
50%Possession53%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.51xG for1.45
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.2xG against1.21
Seoul E-LandCheongju

Shooting quality

Seoul E-Land: Efficient finishingCheongju: Balanced
Seoul E-LandCheongju
Accuracy (shots on target)41%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 0.8 pts / match - Cheongju

Seoul E-Land
WLDWW
Season result split
57% W14% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-4
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Cheongju
DDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W77% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-10-3
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-6-0
Last 5 away
0-5-0
DDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1.71 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.15 goals / match - Cheongju

Seoul E-Land is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.14 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.54 goals / match - Cheongju

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

Cheongju scoring profile: strong

Cheongju scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

24Goals scored (season)15
Seoul E-LandCheongju
16Goals conceded (season)20
Seoul E-LandCheongju
2.86Average goals in match2.69
Seoul E-LandCheongju
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Seoul E-LandCheongju
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Seoul E-LandCheongju

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal77%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
57%2 goals38%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
29%3 goals0%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
0%4 goals0%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal77%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
36%2 goals54%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
14%3 goals15%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
0%4 goals8%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time31%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
0%BTTS in both halves8%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
43%Scored in both halves31%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
60%BTTS - last 560%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time38%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.23 pts / match - Cheongju

Seoul E-Land - half-time state
36% leading43% draw21% trailing
Cheongju - half-time state
23% leading54% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.23
Seoul E-LandCheongju
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.54
Seoul E-LandCheongju
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.08
Seoul E-LandCheongju
50%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
43%No goal before half-time46%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

After half-time (2nd half)

1.79Points per match (2nd half)0.92
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Seoul E-LandCheongju
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Seoul E-LandCheongju
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.62
Seoul E-LandCheongju
57%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Seoul E-LandCheongju
29%No goal after half-time46%
Seoul E-LandCheongju

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

50% W29% R21% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding158%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cheongju - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cheongju - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Cheongju
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Cheongju

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Seoul E-LandLigaCheongju
Average goals in match 2.862.72 2.69
Both teams scored 57%62% 77%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%56% 54%
Clean sheets 36%24% 23%
Goal before half-time 79%72% 69%
Goal after half-time 86%75% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Seoul E-LandYellow cardHyun-Woo Kim
  2. Seoul E-LandGoalHyun Kim
  3. CheongjuYellow cardChang-Hun Lee
  4. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Hyeok-Chan SonOff: Hyun-Woo Kim
  5. Seoul E-LandYellow cardAlan Lima Cariús
  6. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Ji-Hoon MinOff: Jae-Won Seo
  7. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Gabriel dos Santos FranciscoOff: Hyun Kim
  8. CheongjuSubstitutionOn: Kang-Han LeeOff: Jin-Woo Jeong
  9. CheongjuYellow cardMender García Torres

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Seoul E-Land 1 - 0 - 2 Cheongju. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Cheongju FC
0 : 2
Seoul E-Land FC
Cheongju FC
2 : 1
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
0 : 2
Cheongju FC

FAQ

What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju?

The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 2:1 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Cheongju?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 1, Cheongju won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju?

Seoul E-Land score 1.71 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.15. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 77% of Cheongju's.

What form are Seoul E-Land and Cheongju in?

Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cheongju 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju?

The statistical background for Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.