Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju: match statistics
Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seoul E-Land played Cheongju in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 7 June 2026. Venue: Mokdong Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Cheongju: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seoul E-Land scores 1.71 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Cheongju scores 1.15 and concedes 1.54. League average: 2.72 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seoul E-Land 57%, Cheongju 77%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 71%, Cheongju 54%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.45. Seoul E-Land: 12.4 shots per match, Cheongju: 11.8.
Match halves
Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.00. Cheongju: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.62.
Goals by minute
Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (8 goals). Cheongju: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seoul E-Land are the favorites in this matchup: at home they average 2.00 goals per game with an average xG of 1.56 and have a 57% win rate at the stadium (home record 8-2-4 and goal difference +5 at home). Cheongju have no away wins (0 wins, 10 draws, 3 losses this season), score 1.33 goals per game with xG 1.27 and have conceded 20 goals this season compared to Seoul’s 16 conceded. Seoul generate more high-quality chances — 5.43 shots on target and 12.57 shots per game with a 16% conversion versus the visitors’ 4.17 on target and 10 shots with a 13% conversion — and at home they have not failed to score (0% of matches without scoring). Form also favors the hosts: Seoul in the last 5 matches have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (PPG 2.0), while Cheongju in their last 5 have 4 draws and 1 loss (PPG 0.8). Therefore I predict a Seoul E-Land win, although a draw (given the high number of draws in the visitors’ record) remains a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes is more likely at approximately 82% versus 18% for No Goal. Key signal: very high home seasonal BTTS 86% and away 67% against a league average of 62%, indicating a tendency toward both teams scoring. Additionally, home clean sheets are only 14% vs 33% for the visitors, and seasonally they concede on average 1.71 goals per game (home) and 1.33 goals (away), so both teams regularly allow goals. Offensively, home xG is 1.60 with xG against 1.21, while away xG is 1.27 with xG against 1.22; in the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS at 60% and averaged 1.6 and 1.0 goals respectively, confirming they create chances. Similar numbers of shots on target (4.14 vs 4.17) and conversion rates of 8% vs 13% suggest that despite higher total shots for the home side (13.29 vs 10.0), both teams have a realistic chance to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model yields 1.41 expected goals for Seoul E-Land (xG attack 1.60 vs Cheongju xG defense 1.22) and 1.24 for Cheongju (xG attack 1.27 vs Seoul xG defense 1.21), totaling 2.65 goals. Season stats show Seoul at home have 86% of matches over 1.5 goals and Cheongju away 67%; the average of these is about 77%, hence I assign a 78% probability to Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, season values are 43% (Seoul) and 67% (Cheongju), averaging 55%; however Seoul’s last 5 matches show 80% Over 2.5 and the combined xG (2.65) is close to the league average of 2.7, so I rate Over 2.5 at 58%. The 3.5 line looks weaker — seasonally 29% for Seoul and 67% for Cheongju, but lack of consistent confirmation in recent games makes Over 3.5 less likely (35%) and Under 3.5 safer (65%). Additionally, the high percentage of BTTS matches (Seoul 86%, Cheongju 67%) and relatively high xG on both sides confirm that the strongest betting signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT scenario is a draw at the break and a draw at full-time (X/X), which I assign a 36% probability. This is based on Cheongju drawing 100% of their away matches (drawPercentage_away = 100.0) and Seoul E‑Land drawing 57% of their home matches (drawPercentage_home = 57.0), which increases the likelihood of a final draw. At half-time the home team records a draw in 71% of their home games (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 71.0), and the average goals by half are 1.14 for Seoul and 1.0 for Cheongju (AVGHT_home = 1.14, AVGHT_away = 1.0), so an HT draw is highly probable. Although xG favours Seoul (1.6 vs 1.27) and the hosts have better recent form in the last five matches (60% wins for Seoul vs 0% for the visitors), Seoul concedes many late goals (7 conceded in minutes 76–90) and concedes on average 1.14 goals in the second half (conceded_2hg_avg_home = 1.14), so I do not strongly back a home win. For that reason X/X is the strongest signal, while allowing for scenarios with second-half goals (e.g. X/2 = 5% and 2/2 = 11%) and a moderate chance of the hosts leading at the break and holding the lead (1/1 = 11%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seoul E-Land | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seoul E-Land is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 0.8 pts / match - Cheongju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 49% better for: goals scored per match.
1.71 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.15 goals / match - Cheongju
Seoul E-Land is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.54 goals / match - Cheongju
Seoul E-Land scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Cheongju keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
Cheongju scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
Over / Under - Cheongju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.23 pts / match - Cheongju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cheongju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seoul E-Land
Cheongju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seoul E-Land | Liga | Cheongju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.72 | • 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 62% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 56% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 24% | • 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Seoul E-Land 1 - 0 - 2 Cheongju. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju?
The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 2:1 Cheongju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Cheongju?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 1, Cheongju won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju?
Seoul E-Land score 1.71 goals per game on average and Cheongju 1.15. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 77% of Cheongju's.
What form are Seoul E-Land and Cheongju in?
Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Cheongju 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju?
The statistical background for Seoul E-Land vs Cheongju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


