Seoul E-Land vs Gimpo Citizen: match statistics
Seoul E-Land vs Gimpo Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seoul E-Land played Gimpo Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Seoul E-Land: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Gimpo Citizen: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seoul E-Land scores 1.78 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Gimpo Citizen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seoul E-Land 56%, Gimpo Citizen 50%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 67%, Gimpo Citizen 38%. League level: BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Gimpo Citizen has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.50. Seoul E-Land: 12.7 shots per match, Gimpo Citizen: 12.3.
Match halves
Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.00. Gimpo Citizen: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (4 goals). Gimpo Citizen: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 65%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Seoul E-Land have won 4 of their last 5 matches and scored 12 goals in that period, whereas Gimpo Citizen have only 1 win, 4 draws and 7 goals in their last five. The hosts average 2.4 points over the last 5 matches versus 1.4 for the visitors, and in attack they register 13.75 shots and 5.0 on target per game with a 13% conversion and 1.75 goals per game, compared to Gimpo’s 12.25 shots, 5.0 on target, 11% conversion and 1.38 goals per game. The visitors’ defense is nevertheless solid — Gimpo concedes an average of 1.0 goals away, keep 38% clean sheets and fail to score in 25% of away matches; xG comparison indicates parity (Seoul xG 1.62 vs Gimpo 1.57, xG against 1.01 vs 1.05). Considering the home form advantage (4 wins vs 1), higher goal output in the last 5 matches (12 vs 7) and the fact Seoul have not had a game without scoring at home (0% vs 25%), I assess probabilities as 60% Seoul, 25% draw and 15% away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Although Seoul E-Land’s seasonal home stats show 0 goals and 0% BTTS (home season data incomplete), the hosts’ last 5 matches tell a different story: they scored 12 and conceded 4 (avg 2.4 for and 0.8 against per match), with average xG in last 5 at 1.73 vs xG against 1.09. The visitors have a seasonal average of 1.38 scored and 1.00 conceded, visitors’ seasonal BTTS is 50%, and their BTTS in the last 5 is 60% with xG 1.26 and xG against 0.87, indicating they can create chances. Additionally, the league records BTTS at 65% and an average of 2.85 goals per match, and the visitors average 5.0 shots on target and 12.25 shots, supporting a both teams to score scenario. Given the weight of form signals (both teams 60% BTTS in last 5), xG (1.73 vs 1.09 for hosts and 1.26 vs 0.87 for visitors) and the league BTTS level, I assign higher probability to the "Yes" option (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seoul E-Land have averaged 2.4 goals scored in their last 5 matches, while Gimpo Citizen average 1.4, totaling 3.8 goals in their recent outings; however, Seoul’s season home stats are sparse (many 0.0), so I rely on the last 5 matches and xG. Considering xG from the last 5 matches: Seoul xG_for 1.73 and Gimpo xG_against 0.87 yield expected Seoul goals ≈1.30, while Gimpo xG_for 1.26 and Seoul xG_against 1.09 yield expected Gimpo goals ≈1.18, sum 2.48. With a mean of 2.48 the Poisson distribution gives ~71% probability for Over 1.5 goals, ~45% for Over 2.5 goals and ~24% for Over 3.5 goals, thus the strongest signal is Under 3.5 (≈76% probability of <4 goals). Additionally, goal totals in the last 5 matches are 12:4 (Seoul) and 7:6 (Gimpo), which confirms moderate scoring potential and reinforces the Under 3.5 recommendation; the 2.5 line remains less decisive (Over ~45% vs Under ~55%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seoul E-Land are in very good form – they have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and score on average 2.4 goals per game versus Gimpo’s 1.4. The hosts have led at the break in 2 of 5 matches (40%) and average 0.8 first-half goals compared to 0.4 for the visitors, indicating they more often seize the initiative before halftime. Gimpo’s season xG is 1.57 with an average of 1.38 goals per game, but 63% of their away matches feature a clean sheet at the break, suggesting the visitors have a tendency toward draws in the first half. Additionally, the visitors concede an average of 0.63 goals after the break, which makes it easier for the hosts to maintain a lead; therefore the most likely HT/FT outcome is 1/1, with secondary scenarios X/1 and X/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seoul E-Land | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seoul E-Land is 71% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.4 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.78 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.38 goals / match - Gimpo Citizen
Seoul E-Land scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Gimpo Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 matches).
Gimpo Citizen scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
Over / Under - Gimpo Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.78 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.38 pts / match - Gimpo Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gimpo Citizen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seoul E-Land
Gimpo Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seoul E-Land | Liga | Gimpo Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.78 | 2.85 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 56% | 65% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 21% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 78% | 81% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 75% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Seoul E-Land 2 - 1 - 0 Gimpo Citizen. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Gimpo Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 2:1 Gimpo Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Gimpo Citizen?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 2, Gimpo Citizen won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Gimpo Citizen?
Seoul E-Land score 1.78 goals per game on average and Gimpo Citizen 1.38. The K League 2 average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 50% of Gimpo Citizen's.
What form are Seoul E-Land and Gimpo Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Gimpo Citizen 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Gimpo Citizen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


