Seoul E-Land vs Suwon Bluewings: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Seoul E-Land vs Suwon Bluewings: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Seoul E-Land play Suwon Bluewings in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 12 September 2026. Venue: Mokdong Stadium.
Current form
Seoul E-Land: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Suwon Bluewings: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Seoul E-Land scores 1.79 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Suwon Bluewings scores 1.58 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Seoul E-Land 67%, Suwon Bluewings 46%. Over 2.5: Seoul E-Land 67%, Suwon Bluewings 50%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Suwon Bluewings has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.69. Seoul E-Land: 14.0 shots per match, Suwon Bluewings: 14.0.
Match halves
Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.17. Suwon Bluewings: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.08.
Goals by minute
Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (12 goals). Suwon Bluewings: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Seoul E-Land | Suwon Bluewings | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Suwon Bluewings is 44% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 2.6 pts / match - Suwon Bluewings
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.58 goals / match - Suwon Bluewings
Suwon Bluewings is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Seoul E-Land · 0.83 goals / match - Suwon Bluewings
Seoul E-Land scores in 88% of matches (21 of 24 matches), while Suwon Bluewings keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).
Suwon Bluewings scores in 83% of matches (20 of 24 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
Over / Under - Suwon Bluewings
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Suwon Bluewings is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.42 pts / match - Seoul E-Land · 1.67 pts / match - Suwon Bluewings
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Suwon Bluewings - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Seoul E-Land
Suwon Bluewings
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seoul E-Land | Liga | Suwon Bluewings | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.96 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 23% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | • 67% | 68% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Seoul E-Land 2 - 0 - 2 Suwon Bluewings. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do Seoul E-Land and Suwon Bluewings play?
Seoul E-Land face Suwon Bluewings on 12 September 2026 in K League 2 at Mokdong Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Suwon Bluewings?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 2, Suwon Bluewings won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Suwon Bluewings?
Seoul E-Land score 1.79 goals per game on average and Suwon Bluewings 1.58. The K League 2 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 46% of Suwon Bluewings's.
What form are Seoul E-Land and Suwon Bluewings in?
Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Suwon Bluewings 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Suwon Bluewings?
The statistical background for Seoul E-Land vs Suwon Bluewings — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


