Croatia - Druga HNLData current as of 18 September 2026

Sesvete vs Cibalia: match statistics

Sesvete crest
Sesvete
1 : 2half-time 1:2
Cibalia crest
Cibalia

Sesvete vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sesvete played Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The match was played on 18 September 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Sesvete: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Cibalia: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sesvete scores 1.60 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Cibalia scores 0.80 and concedes 0.60. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sesvete 40%, Cibalia 60%. Over 2.5: Sesvete 60%, Cibalia 20%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Cibalia has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.21. Sesvete: 9.4 shots per match, Cibalia: 10.4.

Match halves

Sesvete: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00. Cibalia: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.20.

Goals by minute

Sesvete: 31-45+ (2 goals). Cibalia: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Druga HNL: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sesvete sit 4th, while Cibalia are 7th, and the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just one away victory all season. At home, Sesvete average 2 goals per match and concede only 0.67, keeping a clean sheet in 67% of their games. Cibalia are yet to lose away from home, but both of their matches ended in draws, and they score just 1 goal on average in those fixtures. The visitors do create higher-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.63 compared with Sesvete’s 1.25, but their conversion rate is only 8%, versus 20% for the hosts. Cibalia’s recent run stands at 4 draws and 1 defeat in their last 5 matches, with just 2 goals scored, so home advantage and a more efficient attack point towards Sesvete.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Sesvete keep a clean sheet in 67% of their matches, while Cibalia have failed to score in an average of 3 of their last five games, scoring just 0.4 goals per match. Although the visitors have a seasonal BTTS rate of 100%, this is a small sample, and their current attacking form is very poor: 2 goals in 5 matches and 5 games without a win. In their last five appearances, Sesvete conceded only 0.8 goals per match, with opponents averaging 1.11 xG, further limiting Cibalia’s chances of scoring. The hosts are also not particularly effective across the season, averaging 0.67 goals per home match, so a low-scoring game with at least one team failing to score is the most likely outcome. The BTTS - No pick is also supported by Sesvete’s overall BTTS rate of 33%, as well as a 40% rate for both teams across their last five matches, below the league average of 55%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sesvete boasts a very solid home defense, conceding an average of just 0.33 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches. Cibalia averages 1.00 goals scored away from home, but in their last five matches they have scored just 0.4 goals per game while conceding 0.6. However, both teams have the potential to score individually, with average xG figures of 1.48 for Sesvete and 1.63 for Cibalia, so the 1.5 line does not offer an equally clear edge. The strongest signal concerns the higher goal line: both teams have recorded Under 3.5 goals in 100% of their season matches, while the league average is only 2.4 goals. The projected total of 2.00 goals suggests that Under 3.5 should retain a safe margin even if both sides find the net.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is a cautious first half: Sesvete were level at half-time in 2 of their last 3 matches, while Cibalia did so in 1 of 2; across their last five matches, the half-time draw rates were 60% and 80%, respectively. Cibalia averaged just 0.2 goals before the break in their last five outings and kept a clean sheet in each of them, clearly supporting a low-scoring first half and a draw after 45 minutes. Over the full match, however, the quality advantage lies with Sesvete: the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and average 1.6 goals, while Cibalia have won none and score just 0.4 per game. Despite this, Cibalia drew 80% of their last five matches, and Sesvete have recorded a 67% draw rate in the current season data, making a half-time draw and full-time draw the most likely individual HT/FT outcome. The draw–Sesvete win scenario is a close alternative, as the hosts have averaged 1.0 goal after the break while conceding just 0.2 in their last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
SesveteCibalia
7Shots5
SesveteCibalia
2Shots on target3
SesveteCibalia
1.15xG0.87
SesveteCibalia
7Corners5
SesveteCibalia
79Dangerous attacks46
SesveteCibalia
21Fouls14
SesveteCibalia
0Cards0
SesveteCibalia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match0.8
SesveteCibalia
0.8Goals conceded / match0.6
SesveteCibalia
47%Average possession54%
SesveteCibalia
3.8Shots on target / match4.8
SesveteCibalia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.4Shots per match10.4
SesveteCibalia
3.8Shots on target4.8
SesveteCibalia
17%Shot conversion7.7%
SesveteCibalia
47%Possession54%
SesveteCibalia
1.21xG for1.54
SesveteCibalia
1.11xG against1.28
SesveteCibalia

Shooting quality

Sesvete: Counter-attackingCibalia: Balanced
SesveteCibalia
Accuracy (shots on target)40%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sesvete is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Sesvete · 1.4 pts / match - Cibalia

Sesvete
WLLWW
Season result split
60% W0% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Cibalia
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W80% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sesvete is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Sesvete · 0.8 goals / match - Cibalia

Cibalia is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Sesvete · 0.6 goals / match - Cibalia

Sesvete scoring profile: strong

Sesvete scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Cibalia scoring profile: mixed

Cibalia scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Sesvete keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)4
SesveteCibalia
4Goals conceded (season)3
SesveteCibalia
2.4Average goals in match1.4
SesveteCibalia
8Goals scored (last 5)4
SesveteCibalia
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
SesveteCibalia

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal60%
SesveteCibalia
60%2 goals20%
SesveteCibalia
20%3 goals0%
SesveteCibalia
0%4 goals0%
SesveteCibalia

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal60%
SesveteCibalia
20%2 goals0%
SesveteCibalia
0%3 goals0%
SesveteCibalia
0%4 goals0%
SesveteCibalia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time20%
SesveteCibalia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SesveteCibalia
0%Scored in both halves0%
SesveteCibalia

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
SesveteCibalia
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SesveteCibalia
40%BTTS - last 560%
SesveteCibalia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
SesveteCibalia
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
SesveteCibalia
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
SesveteCibalia

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time40%
SesveteCibalia
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
SesveteCibalia
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SesveteCibalia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cibalia is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Sesvete · 1.8 pts / match - Cibalia

Sesvete - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Cibalia - half-time state
40% leading60% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.8
SesveteCibalia
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.6
SesveteCibalia
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
SesveteCibalia
1.2Average goals (1st half)0.8
SesveteCibalia
60%Clean sheet before half-time80%
SesveteCibalia
60%No goal before half-time60%
SesveteCibalia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)0.8
SesveteCibalia
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
SesveteCibalia
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
SesveteCibalia
1.2Average goals (2nd half)0.6
SesveteCibalia
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
SesveteCibalia
60%No goal after half-time80%
SesveteCibalia

Sesvete - second-half results

40% W40% D20% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Cibalia - second-half results

0% W80% D20% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sesvete - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cibalia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sesvete
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Cibalia
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sesvete

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
117%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Cibalia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.74
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
44%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).

Teams vs league

SesveteLigaCibalia
Average goals in match 2.402.44 1.40
Both teams scored 40%56% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%49% 20%
Clean sheets 40%28% 40%
Goal before half-time 40%68% 40%
Goal after half-time 60%63% 40%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.07
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CibaliaGoalDavid Lagančić
  2. CibaliaGoalDavid Lagančić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Sesvete 0 - 1 - 2 Cibalia. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Sesvete vs Cibalia?

The Druga HNL match finished Sesvete 1:2 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sesvete and Cibalia?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sesvete won 0, Cibalia won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sesvete vs Cibalia?

Sesvete score 1.60 goals per game on average and Cibalia 0.80. The Druga HNL average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Sesvete's matches and 60% of Cibalia's.

What form are Sesvete and Cibalia in?

Over the last 5 games Sesvete have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Cibalia 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sesvete vs Cibalia?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sesvete vs Cibalia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.