Shabana vs TransMara Sugar: match statistics
Shabana vs TransMara Sugar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shabana played TransMara Sugar in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 17 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Shabana: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. TransMara Sugar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shabana scores 1.15 and concedes 1.08 goals per match. TransMara Sugar scores 0.85 and concedes 0.62. League average: 1.90 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shabana 54%, TransMara Sugar 31%. Over 2.5: Shabana 38%, TransMara Sugar 15%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
TransMara Sugar has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.49. Shabana: 11.6 shots per match, TransMara Sugar: 12.7.
Match halves
Shabana: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.31. TransMara Sugar: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Shabana: 0-15 (8 goals). TransMara Sugar: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kenyan Premier League: 1.90 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shabana | TransMara Sugar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 23% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shabana is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Shabana · 1.4 pts / match - TransMara Sugar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shabana is 35% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Shabana · 0.85 goals / match - TransMara Sugar
TransMara Sugar is 74% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.08 goals / match - Shabana · 0.62 goals / match - TransMara Sugar
Shabana scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while TransMara Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).
TransMara Sugar scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Shabana keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shabana
Over / Under - TransMara Sugar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shabana is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / match - Shabana · 0.92 pts / match - TransMara Sugar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shabana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
TransMara Sugar - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shabana
TransMara Sugar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Shabana | Liga | TransMara Sugar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.23 | 1.90 | ▼ 1.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 40% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 30% | ▼ 15% |
| Clean sheets | • 38% | 38% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 46% | 36% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 46% | 39% | • 38% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Shabana vs TransMara Sugar?
The Kenyan Premier League match finished Shabana 0:0 TransMara Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shabana vs TransMara Sugar?
Shabana score 1.15 goals per game on average and TransMara Sugar 0.85. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Shabana's matches and 31% of TransMara Sugar's.
What form are Shabana and TransMara Sugar in?
Over the last 5 games Shabana have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and TransMara Sugar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shabana vs TransMara Sugar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.