Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Shabana vs Tusker: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Shabana vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shabana play Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 1 March 2026 at 13:00.

Current form

Shabana: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Tusker: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shabana scores 1.14 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Tusker scores 0.83 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shabana 43%, Tusker 34%. Over 2.5: Shabana 39%, Tusker 28%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Shabana has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.42. Shabana: 10.5 shots per match, Tusker: 10.9.

Match halves

Shabana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.14. Tusker: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.21.

Goals by minute

Shabana: 0-15 (25 goals). Tusker: 0-15 (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.01 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.14Goals scored / match0.83
ShabanaTusker
1.07Goals conceded / match0.93
ShabanaTusker
48%Average possession51%
ShabanaTusker
3.32Shots on target / match3.79
ShabanaTusker

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.54Shots per match10.93
ShabanaTusker
3.32Shots on target3.79
ShabanaTusker
10.8%Shot conversion7.6%
ShabanaTusker
48%Possession51%
ShabanaTusker
1.43xG for1.42
ShabanaTusker
1.43xG against1.4
ShabanaTusker

Shooting quality

Shabana: BalancedTusker: Balanced
ShabanaTusker
Accuracy (shots on target)31%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shabana is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Shabana · 0.8 pts / match - Tusker

Shabana
LLWLW
Season result split
46% W25% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-7-8
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Tusker
LWLDL
Season result split
41% W17% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-12
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shabana is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.14 goals / match - Shabana · 0.83 goals / match - Tusker

Tusker is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Shabana · 0.93 goals / match - Tusker

Shabana scoring profile: strong

Shabana scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

Tusker scoring profile: mixed

Tusker scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while Shabana keeps a clean sheet in 50% (14 of 28 matches).

32Goals scored (season)24
ShabanaTusker
30Goals conceded (season)27
ShabanaTusker
2.21Average goals in match1.76
ShabanaTusker
4Goals scored (last 5)1
ShabanaTusker
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
ShabanaTusker

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal66%
ShabanaTusker
18%2 goals17%
ShabanaTusker
11%3 goals0%
ShabanaTusker
4%4 goals0%
ShabanaTusker

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal62%
ShabanaTusker
36%2 goals21%
ShabanaTusker
14%3 goals7%
ShabanaTusker
4%4 goals3%
ShabanaTusker

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time3%
ShabanaTusker
4%BTTS in both halves0%
ShabanaTusker
4%Scored in both halves3%
ShabanaTusker

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
ShabanaTusker
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
ShabanaTusker
40%BTTS - last 50%
ShabanaTusker

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

29%Min. 1 goal before half-time31%
ShabanaTusker
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
ShabanaTusker
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
ShabanaTusker

2nd half

25%Min. 1 goal after half-time21%
ShabanaTusker
11%Min. 2 goals after half-time7%
ShabanaTusker
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ShabanaTusker

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shabana is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Shabana · 1.1 pts / match - Tusker

Shabana - half-time state
18% leading75% draw7% trailing
Tusker - half-time state
14% leading69% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.1
ShabanaTusker
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.17
ShabanaTusker
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
ShabanaTusker
0.46Average goals (1st half)0.45
ShabanaTusker
86%Clean sheet before half-time83%
ShabanaTusker
79%No goal before half-time83%
ShabanaTusker

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.28
ShabanaTusker
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)0.21
ShabanaTusker
0.21Goals conceded (2nd half)0.07
ShabanaTusker
0.36Average goals (2nd half)0.28
ShabanaTusker
82%Clean sheet after half-time93%
ShabanaTusker
86%No goal after half-time79%
ShabanaTusker

Shabana - second-half results

7% W82% R11% P
36
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding256%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tusker - second-half results

14% W86% R0% P
32
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding293%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shabana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal20%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shabana
ScoredConceded
25
19
0-15
3
1
16-30
0
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (25 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
14
20
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (14 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shabana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 78% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.47
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 58% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

ShabanaLigaTusker
Average goals in match 2.212.01 1.76
Both teams scored 43%43% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%33% 28%
Clean sheets 50%36% 38%
Goal before half-time 29%21% 31%
Goal after half-time 25%22% 21%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.01
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
36%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.99
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
21%
1 goal
8%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
22%
1 goal
11%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shabana 0 - 1 - 0 Tusker. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tusker
1 : 1
Shabana

FAQ

When do Shabana and Tusker play?

Shabana face Tusker on 1 March 2026 in Kenyan Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shabana vs Tusker?

Shabana score 1.14 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.83. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Shabana's matches and 34% of Tusker's.

What form are Shabana and Tusker in?

Over the last 5 games Shabana have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Tusker 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shabana vs Tusker?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.