Kenya - Kenyan Premier LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Shabana vs Tusker: match statistics

Shabana vs Tusker: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shabana play Tusker in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match date is 1 March 2026.

Current form

Shabana: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Tusker: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shabana scores 1.23 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Tusker scores 0.95 and concedes 1.05. League average: 2.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shabana 45%, Tusker 45%. Over 2.5: Shabana 36%, Tusker 36%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Tusker has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.44. Shabana: 10.5 shots per match, Tusker: 11.7.

Match halves

Shabana: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.18. Tusker: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.27.

Goals by minute

Shabana: 0-15 (20 goals). Tusker: 0-15 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kenyan Premier League: 2.05 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match0.95
ShabanaTusker
1.05Goals conceded / match1.05
ShabanaTusker
48%Average possession51%
ShabanaTusker
3.45Shots on target / match4
ShabanaTusker

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.5Shots per match11.68
ShabanaTusker
3.45Shots on target4
ShabanaTusker
11.7%Shot conversion8.2%
ShabanaTusker
48%Possession51%
ShabanaTusker
1.44xG for1.5
ShabanaTusker
1.4xG against1.37
ShabanaTusker

Shooting quality

Shabana: BalancedTusker: Balanced
ShabanaTusker
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shabana
DWWLW
Season result split
45% W32% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-7-5
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tusker
WDLWW
Season result split
45% W18% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-8
1.55 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-3
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shabana is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Shabana · 0.95 goals / match - Tusker

Shabana scoring profile: very strong

Shabana scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Tusker keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).

Tusker scoring profile: strong

Tusker scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Shabana keeps a clean sheet in 50% (11 of 22 matches).

27Goals scored (season)21
ShabanaTusker
23Goals conceded (season)23
ShabanaTusker
2.27Average goals in match2
ShabanaTusker
8Goals scored (last 5)7
ShabanaTusker
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
ShabanaTusker

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal77%
ShabanaTusker
23%2 goals18%
ShabanaTusker
14%3 goals0%
ShabanaTusker
5%4 goals0%
ShabanaTusker

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal64%
ShabanaTusker
32%2 goals27%
ShabanaTusker
14%3 goals9%
ShabanaTusker
5%4 goals5%
ShabanaTusker

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time5%
ShabanaTusker
5%BTTS in both halves0%
ShabanaTusker
5%Scored in both halves5%
ShabanaTusker

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
ShabanaTusker
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
ShabanaTusker
40%BTTS - last 580%
ShabanaTusker

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

32%Min. 1 goal before half-time41%
ShabanaTusker
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
ShabanaTusker
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
ShabanaTusker

2nd half

27%Min. 1 goal after half-time27%
ShabanaTusker
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time9%
ShabanaTusker
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ShabanaTusker

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shabana is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Shabana · 1.14 pts / match - Tusker

Shabana - half-time state
23% leading73% draw5% trailing
Tusker - half-time state
18% leading59% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.14
ShabanaTusker
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.23
ShabanaTusker
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
ShabanaTusker
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.59
ShabanaTusker
86%Clean sheet before half-time77%
ShabanaTusker
73%No goal before half-time77%
ShabanaTusker

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.36
ShabanaTusker
0.18Goals scored (2nd half)0.27
ShabanaTusker
0.23Goals conceded (2nd half)0.09
ShabanaTusker
0.41Average goals (2nd half)0.36
ShabanaTusker
82%Clean sheet after half-time91%
ShabanaTusker
82%No goal after half-time73%
ShabanaTusker

Shabana - second-half results

9% W82% R9% P
31
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding196%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tusker - second-half results

18% W82% R0% P
25
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding250%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shabana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.00.0
1 goal0%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tusker - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.20.0
1 goal20%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shabana
ScoredConceded
20
15
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (20 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Tusker
ScoredConceded
11
16
0-15
1
4
16-30
2
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.14
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shabana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 74% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Tusker

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 52% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).

Teams vs league

ShabanaLigaTusker
Average goals in match 2.272.05 2.00
Both teams scored 45%46% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%33% 36%
Clean sheets 50%34% 36%
Goal before half-time 32%25% 41%
Goal after half-time 27%27% 27%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+-3%
Home attack advantage
+-3%
Home defence advantage
+-6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
25%
1 goal
10%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
27%
1 goal
14%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shabana 0 - 1 - 0 Tusker. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Tusker
1 : 1
Shabana

FAQ

When do Shabana and Tusker play?

Shabana face Tusker on 1 March 2026 in Kenyan Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shabana vs Tusker?

Shabana score 1.23 goals per game on average and Tusker 0.95. The Kenyan Premier League average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Shabana's matches and 45% of Tusker's.

What form are Shabana and Tusker in?

Over the last 5 games Shabana have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tusker 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shabana vs Tusker?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.