Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman: match statistics

Shahrdari Noshahr crest
Shahrdari Noshahr
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shahrdari Noshahr played Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The match was played on 27 June 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Shahrdari Noshahr: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shahrdari Noshahr scores 0.53 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Mes Kerman scores 0.63 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.52 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shahrdari Noshahr 30%, Mes Kerman 27%. Over 2.5: Shahrdari Noshahr 7%, Mes Kerman 13%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 20%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 1.02. Shahrdari Noshahr: 3.4 shots per match, Mes Kerman: 4.0.

Match halves

Shahrdari Noshahr: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.43. Mes Kerman: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Shahrdari Noshahr: 61-75 (5 goals). Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.52 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 20%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X). Both teams have very low goal output: Shahrdari scores an average of 0.64 goals per home match, while Mes Kerman scores 0.67 goals per away match; the hosts have scored only 2 goals in their last 5 matches and have 57% of home games without a goal. Mes Kerman shows better form — in the last 5 matches they have 1 win and 3 draws and average 1.2 points per game, while Shahrdari have not won in those 5 matches and average 0.6 points. Shahrdari, however, generate significantly more (9.5 shots and 4.25 on target per home game, xG 1.36) but have a low shot conversion of 8%, whereas Mes average 4.14 shots with 1.43 on target away and have a higher conversion of 14% and 60% of away matches with a clean sheet. Considering the low average total goals (1.29 per home match and 1.13 for the visitors), Mes’s superior defence (0.47 goals conceded on average away) and the hosts’ lack of finishing, the most likely outcome is a goalless or narrow draw 0:0/1:1.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS metrics are low: home teams have BTTS in 33% of matches, away teams 20%, with a league average of 30%, suggesting only about one-third of games finish Goal/Goal. Clean sheets are also common — hosts keep a clean sheet in 53% of matches, visitors in 60% (league: 94%), strongly favoring the scenario that at least one side fails to score. Season-long home xG is 1.43 vs. away 0.64 and homes average 4.8 shots on target per match vs. 1.43 for opponents, however in the last 5 matches the visitors have xG 1.44 vs. hosts 0.89 and in those 5 games they scored 5 and conceded 4, while hosts scored 2 and conceded 5. Overall the league’s low goals average 1.52 and low over 2.5 rates (20% for homes and 7% for aways) point to fewer total goals, therefore the No Goal / BTTS - No is the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Seasonal indicators strongly favor a low-goal outcome: Shahrdari have Over 2.5 in 20% of matches, Mes in 7% — averaging ≈14% for Over 2.5 (i.e. ≈86% for Under 2.5). Both teams keep clean sheets frequently (Shahrdari 53%, Mes 60%), and the league averages just 1.52 goals per game, confirming the defensive nature of the competition. xG and form analysis (xG_for: home 1.43, away 0.64; xG_against: home 0.89, away 1.09; in the last 5 matches away xG_for 1.44 vs home 0.89) averaged produces expected ≈0.81 goals for the home side and ≈0.77 for the away side, total ≈1.58. Season shares of Under 1.5 are 67% for both teams, so Under 1.5 is possible, but the strongest signal remains Under 2.5 (historical Under 2.5: 80%/93% home/away), while Over 3.5 is virtually excluded (0% historical Over 3.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I predict a draw at half-time because the home team were level at the break in 67% of their matches and the away team in 73%, giving an average of about a 70% chance of a draw at half-time. Additionally, both teams have very low first-half goal averages: home 0.27 and away 0.20, and the percentage of matches with no goals at half-time is 80% for both teams, which strongly favors no team leading at the break. A draw at full-time is also a natural scenario — the homes draw in 47% of full-time results and the away team in 40% — while full-time clean sheets are 53% (home) and 60% (away), indicating a low goal environment and frequent draws. Although the away side perform better in second halves (on average 1.47 points gained and winning 33% of second halves versus the home team’s 1.2 and 20%), the home team’s higher xG (1.43 vs 0.64) is offset by a very low shot conversion rate for the homes (6% vs 14%), so the chances created may not translate into a goal advantage. Therefore the most likely scenario I select is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), to which I assign the strongest signal in the forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
12Shots5
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
10Shots on target4
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
2.07xG0.98
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
7Corners1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
87Dangerous attacks53
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
-1Fouls-1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
-1Cards-1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.53Goals scored / match0.63
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.83Goals conceded / match0.53
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
26%Average possession28%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.07Shots on target / match1.5
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.43Shots per match4
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.07Shots on target1.5
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
15.5%Shot conversion15.8%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
26%Possession28%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.02xG for1.1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.13xG against0.97
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Shooting quality

Shahrdari Noshahr: Counter-attackingMes Kerman: Counter-attacking
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
Accuracy (shots on target)31%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.28
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mes Kerman is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.2 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr
LDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W43% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-13-12
0.93 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-4-5
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 0.81BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 0%
Mes Kerman
LWDDD
Season result split
30% W43% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-8
1.33 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-4
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 0.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mes Kerman is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

0.53 goals / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.63 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Mes Kerman is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr scoring profile: more difficult

Shahrdari Noshahr scores in 43% of matches (13 of 30 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 57% (17 of 30 matches).

Mes Kerman scoring profile: mixed

Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Shahrdari Noshahr keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 matches).

16Goals scored (season)19
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
25Goals conceded (season)16
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.37Average goals in match1.17
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
2Goals scored (last 5)5
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal53%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
7%2 goals10%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
3%3 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%4 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal43%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
17%2 goals10%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%3 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%4 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
Shahrdari Noshahr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 30 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time7%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%Scored in both halves7%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

BTTS and goal count

7%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
40%BTTS - last 560%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

37%Min. 1 goal before half-time37%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time10%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.2 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr - half-time state
3% leading70% draw27% trailing
Mes Kerman - half-time state
17% leading70% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.2
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.1Goals scored (1st half)0.23
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.23
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.47Average goals (1st half)0.47
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
67%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
90%No goal before half-time77%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.33
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.3
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.7
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
53%Clean sheet after half-time70%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
67%No goal after half-time63%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr - second-half results

17% W57% R27% P
24
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding567%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - second-half results

27% W53% R20% P
36
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shahrdari Noshahr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.40.0
1 goal80%0%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%100%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shahrdari Noshahr
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
7
31-45
4
2
46-60
5
2
61-75
4
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
5
31-45
5
1
46-60
0
4
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
83%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shahrdari Noshahr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
37% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
37%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Shahrdari NoshahrLigaMes Kerman
Average goals in match 1.371.52 1.17
Both teams scored 30%30% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 7%20% 13%
Clean sheets 33%47% 57%
Goal before half-time 37%45% 37%
Goal after half-time 60%55% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.52
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
47%
Clean sheets
0.88
Home goals / match
0.64
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
45%
1 goal
13%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shahrdari Noshahr 0 - 1 - 0 Mes Kerman. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?

The Azadegan League match finished Shahrdari Noshahr 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?

Shahrdari Noshahr score 0.53 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.63. The Azadegan League average is 1.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 20% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Shahrdari Noshahr's matches and 27% of Mes Kerman's.

What form are Shahrdari Noshahr and Mes Kerman in?

Over the last 5 games Shahrdari Noshahr have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Mes Kerman 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.