Iran - Azadegan LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman: match statistics

Shahrdari Noshahr crest
Shahrdari Noshahr
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shahrdari Noshahr play Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 27 June 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Shahrdari Noshahr: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shahrdari Noshahr scores 0.53 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Mes Kerman scores 0.68 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shahrdari Noshahr 32%, Mes Kerman 26%. Over 2.5: Shahrdari Noshahr 6%, Mes Kerman 15%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 1.08. Shahrdari Noshahr: 3.3 shots per match, Mes Kerman: 3.6.

Match halves

Shahrdari Noshahr: half-time lead 3%, second-half goals 0.41. Mes Kerman: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Shahrdari Noshahr: 61-75 (5 goals). Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I predict a draw (X). Both teams have very low goal output: Shahrdari scores an average of 0.64 goals per home match, while Mes Kerman scores 0.67 goals per away match; the hosts have scored only 2 goals in their last 5 matches and have 57% of home games without a goal. Mes Kerman shows better form — in the last 5 matches they have 1 win and 3 draws and average 1.2 points per game, while Shahrdari have not won in those 5 matches and average 0.6 points. Shahrdari, however, generate significantly more (9.5 shots and 4.25 on target per home game, xG 1.36) but have a low shot conversion of 8%, whereas Mes average 4.14 shots with 1.43 on target away and have a higher conversion of 14% and 60% of away matches with a clean sheet. Considering the low average total goals (1.29 per home match and 1.13 for the visitors), Mes’s superior defence (0.47 goals conceded on average away) and the hosts’ lack of finishing, the most likely outcome is a goalless or narrow draw 0:0/1:1.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
12Shots5
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
10Shots on target4
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
2.07xG0.98
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
7Corners1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
87Dangerous attacks53
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
-1Fouls-1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
-1Cards-1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.53Goals scored / match0.68
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.85Goals conceded / match0.53
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
25%Average possession26%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.15Shots on target / match1.35
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.29Shots per match3.59
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.15Shots on target1.35
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
16.1%Shot conversion18.9%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
25%Possession26%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.08xG for1.1
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.12xG against1.03
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Shooting quality

Shahrdari Noshahr: Counter-attackingMes Kerman: Counter-attacking
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.330.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mes Kerman is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.2 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
15% W44% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-15-14
0.88 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-5
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
DLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%
Mes Kerman
DDDLW
Season result split
29% W44% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Mes Kerman is 28% better for: goals scored per match.

0.53 goals / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.68 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Mes Kerman is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr scoring profile: more difficult

Shahrdari Noshahr scores in 44% of matches (15 of 34 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (19 of 34 matches).

Mes Kerman scoring profile: mixed

Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Shahrdari Noshahr keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

18Goals scored (season)23
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
29Goals conceded (season)18
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
1.38Average goals in match1.21
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

How often they score at least...

44%1 goal53%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
6%2 goals12%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
3%3 goals3%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%4 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal44%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
15%2 goals9%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%3 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%4 goals0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

32%
Shahrdari Noshahr - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 34 matches
30%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time6%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%Scored in both halves6%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

BTTS and goal count

6%Min. 3 goals and BTTS12%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
60%BTTS - last 540%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

38%Min. 1 goal before half-time35%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
12%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time12%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.79 pts / match - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.24 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr - half-time state
3% leading71% draw26% trailing
Mes Kerman - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.79Points per match (1st half)1.24
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.12Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.44
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
65%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
88%No goal before half-time76%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.24
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
0.88Average goals (2nd half)0.68
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
53%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman
68%No goal after half-time68%
Shahrdari NoshahrMes Kerman

Shahrdari Noshahr - second-half results

18% W53% R29% P
27
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding500%

Leads at half-time in 3% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - second-half results

24% W53% R24% P
42
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shahrdari Noshahr - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shahrdari Noshahr
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
9
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
2
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.5 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
23%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shahrdari Noshahr

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Shahrdari NoshahrLigaMes Kerman
Average goals in match 1.381.59 1.21
Both teams scored 32%30% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 6%22% 15%
Clean sheets 29%46% 56%
Goal before half-time 38%46% 35%
Goal after half-time 62%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shahrdari Noshahr 0 - 1 - 0 Mes Kerman. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?

The Azadegan League match finished Shahrdari Noshahr 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?

Shahrdari Noshahr score 0.53 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Shahrdari Noshahr's matches and 26% of Mes Kerman's.

What form are Shahrdari Noshahr and Mes Kerman in?

Over the last 5 games Shahrdari Noshahr have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Mes Kerman 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.