Ireland - Premier DivisionData current as of 06 September 2026

Shamrock Rovers vs Waterford: match statistics

Shamrock Rovers crest
Shamrock Rovers
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Waterford crest
Waterford

Shamrock Rovers vs Waterford: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shamrock Rovers played Waterford in Premier Division (Ireland). The match was played on 1 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Shamrock Rovers: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Waterford: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shamrock Rovers scores 1.46 and concedes 0.85 goals per match. Waterford scores 0.75 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.64 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shamrock Rovers 46%, Waterford 50%. Over 2.5: Shamrock Rovers 31%, Waterford 25%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Shamrock Rovers has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.23. Shamrock Rovers: 12.3 shots per match, Waterford: 11.5.

Match halves

Shamrock Rovers: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.62. Waterford: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Shamrock Rovers: 31-45+ (7 goals). Waterford: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Division: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-0. Average goals 2.40, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Shamrock Rovers are clear favorites: at home they have 7 wins, 4 draws and 2 losses (83% home win rate), averaging 1.83 goals scored and only 0.67 conceded per match, with 50% clean sheets. Waterford have yet to win away (0 wins, 5 draws, 7 losses), score 1.0 goal on average but concede as many as 3.0 goals away and have 50% of matches without scoring. Chance quality favors the hosts: Shamrock register 5.17 shots on target (11.83 total) with a 15% conversion and xG 1.42, while Waterford manage only 3.17 shots on target (13.67 total) with a 7% conversion and xG 1.38. Defensively the gap is significant — Shamrock allow xG 1.24 at home, whereas Waterford face xG 2.2 on the road, which translates to 24 goals conceded this season. Considering form (Shamrock 7 goals and 3 wins in the last 5, Waterford 3 goals and no wins) and 0% FTS for the hosts versus 50% for the visitors, I predict a Shamrock Rovers victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes with a 66% probability versus 34% No BTTS. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred at 60% (Shamrock 60% and Waterford 60%), while the league average BTTS is 54%, indicating an overall trend favoring both teams to score. Waterford as the away side concedes on average 3.0 goals per match this season and has 0% clean sheets away; in the last 5 matches they allowed 2.27 xG against and conceded 7 goals, which strongly increases the likelihood of a home goal. Shamrock in the last 5 matches scored an average of 1.4 goals and has 1.44 xG in that period, and both teams generate shots — Waterford averages 13.67 shots and 3.17 shots on target, Shamrock 9.33 and 2.67 — indicating realistic scoring opportunities from both sides. Although seasonally Shamrock scores only 0.5 goals at home and has 17% clean sheets, and the seasonal BTTS for both teams is 50%, the cumulative signals (60% in last 5, 0% away clean sheets for Waterford, high xG against 2.27) favor the "Yes" scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Considering xG and form, I calculated expected goals as the average of season and last 5 matches: for Shamrock Rovers I used season attacking xG 1.07 and last 5 attacking xG 1.44, and Waterford’s defensive xG (season 2.20, last 5 matches 2.27); the average of these four values is 1.745, i.e. ~1.75 goals for the home side. For Waterford similarly: season attacking xG 1.38 and last 5 attacking xG 1.02, and Shamrock’s defensive xG (season 2.14, last 5 matches 1.32); average = 1.465, i.e. ~1.46 goals for the away side. Total expected goals ≈3.21; using a Poisson distribution this yields probability of Over 1.5 ≈83% (1 - e^{-3.21}(1+3.21)), Over 2.5 ≈62% and Over 3.5 ≈40%. Match data confirm the direction: percentage of matches with over 1.5 goals this season is 67% for Shamrock and 100% for Waterford, and both teams have a high share of Over 0.5 (83% and 100%), which supports Over 1.5. Therefore the best line to play is Over 1.5 (side: "over", line: 1.5) as the strongest signal (83%) with moderate risk.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is 1/1: Shamrock Rovers lead at the break and ultimately win. In the last 5 matches the home side led at half-time in 60% of games (3/5) and won 60% of those matches (3/5), averaging 1.0 goals at half-time versus Waterford’s 0.2. Form over the last 5 also favors the hosts — Shamrock averages 2.0 points per game vs. 0.6 for the visitors and scored 7 first-half goals in those 5 matches compared to Waterford’s 4. Although Waterford have a slightly higher xG (1.38 vs. 1.07) and more average shots (13.67 vs. 9.33), their conversion rate is only 7% compared to Shamrock’s 5% and the visitors have not won in their last 5 matches (0% wins), which undermines their prospects. Additionally, the hosts perform better in second halves in terms of points (9 points from second halves, averaging 1.5 pts vs. Waterford’s 1 point and 0.17 average), so a Shamrock lead at half-time with maintenance of the win appears most justified.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
Shamrock RoversWaterford
22Shots8
Shamrock RoversWaterford
4Shots on target2
Shamrock RoversWaterford
2.18xG0.86
Shamrock RoversWaterford
6Corners3
Shamrock RoversWaterford
71Dangerous attacks29
Shamrock RoversWaterford
12Fouls8
Shamrock RoversWaterford
2Cards1
Shamrock RoversWaterford

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shamrock RoversWaterford
1.46Goals scored / match0.75
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0.85Goals conceded / match2
Shamrock RoversWaterford
59%Average possession41%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
4.31Shots on target / match2.92
Shamrock RoversWaterford

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.31Shots per match11.5
Shamrock RoversWaterford
4.31Shots on target2.92
Shamrock RoversWaterford
11.9%Shot conversion6.5%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
59%Possession41%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
1.41xG for1.23
Shamrock RoversWaterford
1.17xG against2.17
Shamrock RoversWaterford

Shooting quality

Shamrock Rovers: BalancedWaterford: Balanced
Shamrock RoversWaterford
Accuracy (shots on target)35%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shamrock Rovers is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Shamrock Rovers · 0.6 pts / match - Waterford

Shamrock Rovers
DWWWL
Season result split
54% W31% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-2
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Waterford
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W42% R58% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-5-7
0.42 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.03Opponent xG: 2.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shamrock Rovers is 95% better for: goals scored per match.

1.46 goals / match - Shamrock Rovers · 0.75 goals / match - Waterford

Shamrock Rovers is 135% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.85 goals / match - Shamrock Rovers · 2 goals / match - Waterford

Shamrock Rovers scoring profile: very strong

Shamrock Rovers scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Waterford keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 matches).

Waterford scoring profile: mixed

Waterford scores in 50% of matches (6 of 12 matches), while Shamrock Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).

19Goals scored (season)9
Shamrock RoversWaterford
11Goals conceded (season)24
Shamrock RoversWaterford
2.31Average goals in match2.75
Shamrock RoversWaterford
7Goals scored (last 5)3
Shamrock RoversWaterford
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Shamrock RoversWaterford

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal50%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
54%2 goals17%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
8%3 goals8%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0%4 goals0%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal92%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
23%2 goals50%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
8%3 goals25%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0%4 goals25%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time8%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
8%BTTS in both halves8%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
15%Scored in both halves17%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
60%BTTS - last 560%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shamrock Rovers is 136% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.77 pts / match - Shamrock Rovers · 0.75 pts / match - Waterford

Shamrock Rovers - half-time state
46% leading38% draw15% trailing
Waterford - half-time state
17% leading25% draw58% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.77Points per match (1st half)0.75
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
Shamrock RoversWaterford
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.25
Shamrock RoversWaterford
69%Clean sheet before half-time33%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
46%No goal before half-time75%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)0.83
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
Shamrock RoversWaterford
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
Shamrock RoversWaterford
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Shamrock RoversWaterford
62%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Shamrock RoversWaterford
54%No goal after half-time58%
Shamrock RoversWaterford

Shamrock Rovers - second-half results

23% W62% R15% P
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Waterford - second-half results

17% W33% R50% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shamrock Rovers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Waterford - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shamrock Rovers
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
7
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Waterford
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
3
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
2
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.53
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shamrock Rovers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Waterford

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.94
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Division).

Teams vs league

Shamrock RoversLigaWaterford
Average goals in match 2.312.64 2.75
Both teams scored 46%55% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%47% 25%
Clean sheets 46%28% 8%
Goal before half-time 69%70% 83%
Goal after half-time 62%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.64
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Shamrock RoversGoalGraham Dylan BurkeAssist: Enda Stevens
  2. WaterfordSubstitutionOn: Trae CoyleOff: Evan McLaughlin
  3. Shamrock RoversYellow cardMichael Noonan
  4. WaterfordYellow cardSamuel Glenfield
  5. Shamrock RoversYellow cardEnda Stevens

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Shamrock Rovers 4 - 1 - 0 Waterford. Average goals 2.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Waterford
1 : 1
Shamrock Rovers
Waterford FC
1 : 2
Shamrock Rovers FC
Shamrock Rovers FC
1 : 0
Waterford FC
Waterford FC
1 : 3
Shamrock Rovers FC
Shamrock Rovers FC
2 : 0
Waterford FC

FAQ

What was the result of Shamrock Rovers vs Waterford?

The Premier Division match finished Shamrock Rovers 1:0 Waterford. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shamrock Rovers and Waterford?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Shamrock Rovers won 4, Waterford won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shamrock Rovers vs Waterford?

Shamrock Rovers score 1.46 goals per game on average and Waterford 0.75. The Premier Division average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Shamrock Rovers's matches and 50% of Waterford's.

What form are Shamrock Rovers and Waterford in?

Over the last 5 games Shamrock Rovers have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Waterford 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shamrock Rovers vs Waterford?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shamrock Rovers vs Waterford: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.