Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 08 September 2026

Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak: match statistics

135%(2.50)
X40%(3.00)
225%(2.75)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced match between two teams from the bottom half of the table. Shams Azar Qazvin has an impressive percentage of draws in home matches (60%), confirming their tendency to share points at their own stadium. The hosts show stable form in the last five matches (1.6 points per match), while Aluminium Arak presents weaker away disposition (50% losses, only 20% wins). Both teams have similar problems with converting chances – the hosts with an efficiency of 13%, the guests just 7%. Considering the low efficiency of both teams, the hosts' high propensity for draws, and the guests' poor away form, the most likely result is a split of points.

Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shams Azar Qazvin played Aluminium Arak in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 13 February 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shams Azar Qazvin: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Aluminium Arak: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.75 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Aluminium Arak scores 0.65 and concedes 1.00. League average: 1.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shams Azar Qazvin 35%, Aluminium Arak 30%. Over 2.5: Shams Azar Qazvin 15%, Aluminium Arak 20%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Shams Azar Qazvin has higher xG: 0.94 vs 0.91. Shams Azar Qazvin: 3.5 shots per match, Aluminium Arak: 2.3.

Match halves

Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60. Aluminium Arak: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Shams Azar Qazvin: 46-60 (4 goals). Aluminium Arak: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.76 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a balanced match between two teams from the bottom half of the table. Shams Azar Qazvin has an impressive percentage of draws in home matches (60%), confirming their tendency to share points at their own stadium. The hosts show stable form in the last five matches (1.6 points per match), while Aluminium Arak presents weaker away disposition (50% losses, only 20% wins). Both teams have similar problems with converting chances – the hosts with an efficiency of 13%, the guests just 7%. Considering the low efficiency of both teams, the hosts' high propensity for draws, and the guests' poor away form, the most likely result is a split of points.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
-1Shots-1
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
-1Shots on target-1
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0xG0
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
-1Corners-1
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0Dangerous attacks0
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
-1Fouls-1
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
2Cards0
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.75Goals scored / match0.65
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.8Goals conceded / match1
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
27%Average possession22%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
1.1Shots on target / match0.45
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.45Shots per match2.25
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
1.1Shots on target0.45
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
21.7%Shot conversion28.9%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
27%Possession22%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.94xG for0.91
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
1.18xG against1.2
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

Shooting quality

Shams Azar Qazvin: Counter-attackingAluminium Arak: Counter-attacking
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
Accuracy (shots on target)32%20%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.270.40
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.681.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1 pts / match - Aluminium Arak

Shams Azar Qazvin
DDWWL
Season result split
15% W60% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-12-5
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-6-3
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
LDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Aluminium Arak
LDLDW
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-10
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
0-3-2
LDLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.65 goals / match - Aluminium Arak

Shams Azar Qazvin is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.8 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1 goals / match - Aluminium Arak

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: mixed

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 50% of matches (10 of 20 matches), while Aluminium Arak keeps a clean sheet in 35% (7 of 20 matches).

Aluminium Arak scoring profile: mixed

Aluminium Arak scores in 55% of matches (11 of 20 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 50% (10 of 20 matches).

15Goals scored (season)13
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
16Goals conceded (season)20
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
1.55Average goals in match1.65
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal55%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
15%2 goals10%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5%3 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5%4 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal65%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
15%2 goals20%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
10%3 goals10%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5%4 goals5%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
Shams Azar Qazvin - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 20 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time15%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5%BTTS in both halves5%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5%Scored in both halves5%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

BTTS and goal count

15%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
20%BTTS - last 560%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aluminium Arak is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.2 pts / match - Aluminium Arak

Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing
Aluminium Arak - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.2
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.15Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.85
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
70%Clean sheet before half-time70%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
90%No goal before half-time65%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)0.8
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
1.05Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
65%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak
55%No goal after half-time75%
Shams Azar QazvinAluminium Arak

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

25% W60% R15% P
16
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aluminium Arak - second-half results

10% W50% R40% P
24
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.21.4
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Aluminium Arak - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
1
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Aluminium Arak
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
6
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Aluminium Arak

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Shams Azar QazvinLigaAluminium Arak
Average goals in match 1.551.76 1.65
Both teams scored 35%38% 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 15%27% 20%
Clean sheets 50%42% 35%
Goal before half-time 30%53% 50%
Goal after half-time 60%61% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.76
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
0.98
Home goals / match
0.78
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Shams Azar QazvinSubstitutionOn: Ahoora ZandOff: Mehdi Mohammadi
  2. Shams Azar QazvinYellow cardAmirmohammad Mohkamkar
  3. Shams Azar QazvinYellow cardMehdi Mamizadeh

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shams Azar Qazvin 0 - 0 - 1 Aluminium Arak. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Aluminium Arak
1 : 0
Shams Azar Qazvin

FAQ

What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 0:0 Aluminium Arak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak?

Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.75 goals per game on average and Aluminium Arak 0.65. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 30% of Aluminium Arak's.

What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Aluminium Arak in?

Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Aluminium Arak 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Aluminium Arak: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.