Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan: match statistics

135%(2.11)
X40%(2.81)
225%(3.57)

Statistical analysis suggests a closely contested match with a high probability of a draw. Shams Azar Qazvin shows solid home form with a 67% draw rate and an impressive unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (1W-4D). The hosts are tough to beat at home, conceding just 0 goals in their last 5 matches. Mes Rafsanjan has a very poor away form (0% wins, 78% losses), but their overall last 5 matches show improvement (1W-2D-2L). The expected goals (xG) for both teams are similar, confirming their balanced strength. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' offensive struggles, the most likely outcome appears to be a draw or a narrow home win.

Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shams Azar Qazvin play Mes Rafsanjan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 1 February 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Mes Rafsanjan: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.65 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.59 and concedes 1.32. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shams Azar Qazvin 30%, Mes Rafsanjan 27%. Over 2.5: Shams Azar Qazvin 13%, Mes Rafsanjan 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Shams Azar Qazvin has higher xG: 0.97 vs 0.87. Shams Azar Qazvin: 3.3 shots per match, Mes Rafsanjan: -0.3.

Match halves

Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.52. Mes Rafsanjan: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

Shams Azar Qazvin: 46-60 (4 goals). Mes Rafsanjan: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis suggests a closely contested match with a high probability of a draw. Shams Azar Qazvin shows solid home form with a 67% draw rate and an impressive unbeaten run in their last 5 matches (1W-4D). The hosts are tough to beat at home, conceding just 0 goals in their last 5 matches. Mes Rafsanjan has a very poor away form (0% wins, 78% losses), but their overall last 5 matches show improvement (1W-2D-2L). The expected goals (xG) for both teams are similar, confirming their balanced strength. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' offensive struggles, the most likely outcome appears to be a draw or a narrow home win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots-1
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots on target-1
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0xG0
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
-1Corners-1
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0Dangerous attacks0
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
-1Fouls-1
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
1Cards4
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.65Goals scored / match0.59
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.83Goals conceded / match1.32
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
25%Average possession1%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
1.13Shots on target / match-0.86
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.26Shots per match-0.27
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
1.13Shots on target-0.86
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
20%Shot conversion-216.7%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
25%Possession1%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.97xG for0.87
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
1.18xG against1.31
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

Shooting quality

Shams Azar Qazvin: Counter-attackingMes Rafsanjan: Balanced
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
Accuracy (shots on target)35%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.580.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shams Azar Qazvin
WLDLL
Season result split
13% W57% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-13-7
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Mes Rafsanjan
DLLWL
Season result split
14% W27% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-13
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shams Azar Qazvin is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.59 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Shams Azar Qazvin is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.32 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: mixed

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 43% of matches (10 of 23 matches), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Mes Rafsanjan scoring profile: more difficult

Mes Rafsanjan scores in 36% of matches (8 of 22 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).

15Goals scored (season)13
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
19Goals conceded (season)29
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
1.48Average goals in match1.91
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal36%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
13%2 goals23%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4%3 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4%4 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal68%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
17%2 goals41%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
9%3 goals18%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4%4 goals5%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
Shams Azar Qazvin - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 23 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time14%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4%BTTS in both halves5%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4%Scored in both halves9%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
20%BTTS - last 50%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
0% leading78% draw22% trailing
Mes Rafsanjan - half-time state
9% leading50% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.78Points per match (1st half)0.77
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.13Goals scored (1st half)0.27
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.48Average goals (1st half)0.86
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
70%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
91%No goal before half-time77%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)0.82
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
1Average goals (2nd half)1.05
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
61%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan
61%No goal after half-time77%
Shams Azar QazvinMes Rafsanjan

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

22% W57% R22% P
18
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results

14% W41% R45% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mes Rafsanjan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mes Rafsanjan
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
7
31-45
3
8
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
15%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
36%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Mes Rafsanjan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Shams Azar QazvinLigaMes Rafsanjan
Average goals in match 1.481.79 1.91
Both teams scored 30%38% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%28% 27%
Clean sheets 48%41% 32%
Goal before half-time 30%54% 64%
Goal after half-time 61%62% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shams Azar Qazvin 0 - 1 - 0 Mes Rafsanjan. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Mes Rafsanjan
0 : 0
Shams Azar Qazvin

FAQ

What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 2:0 Mes Rafsanjan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan?

Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.65 goals per game on average and Mes Rafsanjan 0.59. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 27% of Mes Rafsanjan's.

What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Mes Rafsanjan in?

Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Mes Rafsanjan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Mes Rafsanjan?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.