Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shams Azar Qazvin play Tractor Sazi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 26 December 2025 at 13:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shams Azar Qazvin: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Tractor Sazi: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.65 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Tractor Sazi scores 1.23 and concedes 0.55. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shams Azar Qazvin 30%, Tractor Sazi 41%. Over 2.5: Shams Azar Qazvin 13%, Tractor Sazi 36%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Tractor Sazi has higher xG: 1.81 vs 0.97. Shams Azar Qazvin: 3.3 shots per match, Tractor Sazi: 2.4.

Match halves

Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.52. Tractor Sazi: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Shams Azar Qazvin: 46-60 (4 goals). Tractor Sazi: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
8Shots11
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
2Shots on target3
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.95xG1.3
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
3Corners4
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
43Dangerous attacks56
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
-1Fouls-1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
2Cards1
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.65Goals scored / match1.23
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.83Goals conceded / match0.55
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
25%Average possession12%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1.13Shots on target / match0.82
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.26Shots per match2.36
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1.13Shots on target0.82
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
20%Shot conversion51.9%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
25%Possession12%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.97xG for1.81
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1.18xG against1.21
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Shooting quality

Shams Azar Qazvin: Counter-attackingTractor Sazi: Counter-attacking
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.77
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.581.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tractor Sazi is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 2 pts / match - Tractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin
WLDLL
Season result split
13% W57% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-13-7
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-7-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Tractor Sazi
WWLDW
Season result split
41% W45% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-3
1.68 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-6-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tractor Sazi is 89% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.23 goals / match - Tractor Sazi

Tractor Sazi is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.55 goals / match - Tractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin scoring profile: more difficult

Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 43% of matches (10 of 23 matches), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 55% (12 of 22 matches).

Tractor Sazi scoring profile: mixed

Tractor Sazi scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 48% (11 of 23 matches).

15Goals scored (season)27
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
19Goals conceded (season)12
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1.48Average goals in match1.77
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4Goals scored (last 5)5
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
6Goals conceded (last 5)3
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

How often they score at least...

43%1 goal59%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
13%2 goals27%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4%3 goals18%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4%4 goals14%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal45%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
17%2 goals9%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
9%3 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4%4 goals0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
Shams Azar Qazvin - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 23 matches
38%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time18%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4%Scored in both halves23%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
20%BTTS - last 540%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

30%Min. 1 goal before half-time41%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tractor Sazi is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.78 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.55 pts / match - Tractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin - half-time state
0% leading78% draw22% trailing
Tractor Sazi - half-time state
27% leading73% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.78Points per match (1st half)1.55
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.13Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.18
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.48Average goals (1st half)0.68
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
70%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
91%No goal before half-time59%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)1.41
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
0.48Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
1Average goals (2nd half)1.09
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
61%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi
61%No goal after half-time59%
Shams Azar QazvinTractor Sazi

Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results

22% W57% R22% P
18
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.78
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tractor Sazi - second-half results

27% W59% R14% P
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shams Azar Qazvin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Tractor Sazi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shams Azar Qazvin
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Tractor Sazi
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
6
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
4
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.63
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shams Azar Qazvin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Tractor Sazi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

Shams Azar QazvinLigaTractor Sazi
Average goals in match 1.481.79 1.77
Both teams scored 30%38% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 13%28% 36%
Clean sheets 48%41% 55%
Goal before half-time 30%54% 41%
Goal after half-time 61%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 0:0 Tractor Sazi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?

Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.65 goals per game on average and Tractor Sazi 1.23. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 41% of Tractor Sazi's.

What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Tractor Sazi in?

Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Tractor Sazi 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.