Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi: match statistics
Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shams Azar Qazvin played Tractor Sazi in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match was played on 26 December 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Shams Azar Qazvin: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match. Tractor Sazi: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.71 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Tractor Sazi scores 1.38 and concedes 0.62. League average: 1.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shams Azar Qazvin 43%, Tractor Sazi 46%. Over 2.5: Shams Azar Qazvin 14%, Tractor Sazi 46%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 24%.
xG, shots and style
Tractor Sazi has higher xG: 1.94 vs 0.94. Shams Azar Qazvin: 4.7 shots per match, Tractor Sazi: 3.8.
Match halves
Shams Azar Qazvin: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Tractor Sazi: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
Shams Azar Qazvin: 61-75 (4 goals). Tractor Sazi: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.76 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 24%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 47% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.51 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.78 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tractor Sazi is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.6 pts / match - Tractor Sazi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tractor Sazi is 94% better for: goals scored per match.
0.71 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.38 goals / match - Tractor Sazi
Tractor Sazi is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 0.62 goals / match - Tractor Sazi
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 50% of matches (7 of 14 matches), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 matches).
Tractor Sazi scores in 54% of matches (7 of 13 matches), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shams Azar Qazvin
Over / Under - Tractor Sazi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tractor Sazi is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.79 pts / match - Shams Azar Qazvin · 1.46 pts / match - Tractor Sazi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tractor Sazi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shams Azar Qazvin
Tractor Sazi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Shams Azar Qazvin | Liga | Tractor Sazi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.64 | 1.76 | ▲ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 38% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 14% | 24% | ▲ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 41% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 36% | 56% | ▼ 38% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 64% | 61% | • 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Shams Azar Qazvin 0:0 Tractor Sazi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?
Shams Azar Qazvin score 0.71 goals per game on average and Tractor Sazi 1.38. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Shams Azar Qazvin's matches and 46% of Tractor Sazi's.
What form are Shams Azar Qazvin and Tractor Sazi in?
Over the last 5 games Shams Azar Qazvin have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Tractor Sazi 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shams Azar Qazvin vs Tractor Sazi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.