Shanghai Jiading vs Changchun Yatai: match statistics
Shanghai Jiading vs Changchun Yatai: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shanghai Jiading played Changchun Yatai in China League One (China). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Shanghai Jiading: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Changchun Yatai: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shanghai Jiading scores 1.00 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Changchun Yatai scores 1.33 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.21 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shanghai Jiading 33%, Changchun Yatai 67%. Over 2.5: Shanghai Jiading 67%, Changchun Yatai 67%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai Jiading has higher xG: 1.17 vs 1.11. Shanghai Jiading: 8.2 shots per match, Changchun Yatai: 8.2.
Match halves
Shanghai Jiading: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67. Changchun Yatai: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Shanghai Jiading: 31-45+ (2 goals). Changchun Yatai: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.21 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Changchun Yatai appears to be the favorite: they sit 7th in the table while Shanghai Jiading are 16th and have lost all home matches (100% defeats). The hosts concede an average of 3 goals per home match and have conceded 8 goals in their last 5 fixtures, whereas Changchun concede 1.33 goals on average away and have let in 5 in their last five games. Shanghai create more chances (on average 12.5 shots and 3 on target at home) and have a higher home xG (1.68 vs. 0.91 xG for the visitors away), but their home conversion is only 8% and in 50% of home matches they fail to score. The visitors are significantly more efficient with fewer attempts (6.67 shots and 2 on target away) with a 20% conversion and average 1.33 goals away, and they have earned 1.8 points per match in their last 5 games versus the hosts' 0.8 points, all favouring a Changchun win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% (Shanghai Jiading 67% and Changchun Yatai 67%), which is significantly above the league average of 40% and indicates a higher likelihood of both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches BTTS was 40% for Shanghai and 60% for Changchun, so short-term signals are mixed, but the visitors have found the net more often. Shanghai has a higher xG (1.31 vs 0.91) and more on-target shots on average (4.67 vs 2.0), suggesting they will create chances; meanwhile Changchun has a seasonal goals scored average of 1.33 and 0% clean sheets, meaning they regularly concede. In the last 5 matches Shanghai conceded an average of 1.6 goals and Changchun 1.0, which further increases the probability of an exchange of goals. Considering the seasonal 67% for both and the hosts’ xG creation advantage, I recommend BTTS - Yes with a probability of 65% versus 35% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Combining the teams' attack and defense xG yields 1.18 xG for Shanghai Jiading (1.31 xG attack vs 1.04 xG defense of Changchun) and 1.18 xG for Changchun Yatai (0.91 xG attack vs 1.44 xG defense of Shanghai), totaling 2.36 expected goals. Historical data points to a higher scoring outcome: season Over 2.5 is 67% for both teams, and in the last 5 matches Shanghai had Over 2.5 in 80% and Changchun in 60%. Shot volume and conversion rates push goal expectations up — Shanghai averages 9.67 shots with a 14% conversion (~1.35 goals), Changchun 6.67 shots with a 20% conversion (~1.33 goals), combined ≈2.68 goals. Both sides have BTTS at 67% and season Over 1.5 also 67%, while the hosts have 33% clean sheets versus 0% for the visitors, which further increases the likelihood of at least two goals. Based on this I recommend Over 1.5 (my subjective probability: 75% for Over); I would rate Over 2.5 at about 68% given the 67% season figure and recent form, whereas Over 3.5 looks less likely (≈24%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At Half-Time I expect a draw: the home side have not led at the break in the dataset (0.0%), and a draw at the break occurred in 100.0% of their matches, with an average of 0.67 goals to the break for each team, i.e. 1.33 goals total. After the break a home victory is more likely, because the home team’s season xG is 1.31 versus 0.91 for the visitors, and the home side average 4.67 shots on target versus 2.0 and 9.67 shots overall versus 6.67, which suggests a clear advantage in chance creation. Additionally the hosts have a better home points average – 2.0 points per match versus 1.0 for the away team – and win 67.0% of home matches versus 33.0% wins for the visitors, supporting the scenario that after a draw at the break they will dominate the second half. However the form over the last 5 matches favors the visitors: the away team won 60.0% of their last five while the hosts won only 20.0%, so I maintain a moderate probability of a full-time draw and an away victory. As a result I select as the strongest signal the Half-Time draw and home win scenario (X/1) and assign it 35% probability.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shanghai Jiading | Changchun Yatai | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Changchun Yatai is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading · 1.8 pts / match - Changchun Yatai
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Changchun Yatai is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading · 1.33 goals / match - Changchun Yatai
Changchun Yatai is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.67 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading · 1.17 goals / match - Changchun Yatai
Shanghai Jiading scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Changchun Yatai keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).
Changchun Yatai scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Shanghai Jiading keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shanghai Jiading
Over / Under - Changchun Yatai
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Changchun Yatai is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading · 1.17 pts / match - Changchun Yatai
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shanghai Jiading - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Changchun Yatai - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shanghai Jiading
Changchun Yatai
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Shanghai Jiading | Liga | Changchun Yatai | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.21 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 48% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | • 33% | 33% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 69% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Shanghai Jiading vs Changchun Yatai?
The China League One match finished Shanghai Jiading 3:1 Changchun Yatai. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai Jiading vs Changchun Yatai?
Shanghai Jiading score 1.00 goals per game on average and Changchun Yatai 1.33. The China League One average is 2.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Shanghai Jiading's matches and 67% of Changchun Yatai's.
What form are Shanghai Jiading and Changchun Yatai in?
Over the last 5 games Shanghai Jiading have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Changchun Yatai 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai Jiading vs Changchun Yatai?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shanghai Jiading vs Changchun Yatai: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


