Shanghai Jiading vs Guangzhou E-Power: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Shanghai Jiading vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shanghai Jiading play Guangzhou E-Power in China League One (China). The match date is 25 July 2026 at 13:00.
Current form
Shanghai Jiading: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Guangzhou E-Power: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shanghai Jiading scores 1.33 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Guangzhou E-Power scores 1.87 and concedes 0.93. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shanghai Jiading 53%, Guangzhou E-Power 53%. Over 2.5: Shanghai Jiading 53%, Guangzhou E-Power 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Guangzhou E-Power has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.29. Shanghai Jiading: 9.7 shots per match, Guangzhou E-Power: 15.9.
Match halves
Shanghai Jiading: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Guangzhou E-Power: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.93.
Goals by minute
Shanghai Jiading: 76-90+ (5 goals). Guangzhou E-Power: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shanghai Jiading | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shanghai Jiading is 15% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading · 2.6 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Guangzhou E-Power is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading · 1.87 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Guangzhou E-Power is 15% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.07 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading · 0.93 goals / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Shanghai Jiading scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Guangzhou E-Power keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Guangzhou E-Power scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Shanghai Jiading keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Shanghai Jiading
Over / Under — Guangzhou E-Power
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Guangzhou E-Power is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading · 1.87 pts / match - Guangzhou E-Power
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shanghai Jiading - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Guangzhou E-Power - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shanghai Jiading
Guangzhou E-Power
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Shanghai Jiading | Liga | Guangzhou E-Power | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.40 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 52% | • 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 71% | ▲ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Shanghai Jiading 0 - 1 - 2 Guangzhou E-Power. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
When do Shanghai Jiading and Guangzhou E-Power play?
Shanghai Jiading face Guangzhou E-Power on 25 July 2026 in China League One. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shanghai Jiading and Guangzhou E-Power?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shanghai Jiading won 0, Guangzhou E-Power won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai Jiading vs Guangzhou E-Power?
Shanghai Jiading score 1.33 goals per game on average and Guangzhou E-Power 1.87. The China League One average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Shanghai Jiading's matches and 53% of Guangzhou E-Power's.
What form are Shanghai Jiading and Guangzhou E-Power in?
Over the last 5 games Shanghai Jiading have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Guangzhou E-Power 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai Jiading vs Guangzhou E-Power?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shanghai Jiading vs Guangzhou E-Power: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.