China - Chinese Super LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics

Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shanghai SIPG played Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Shanghai SIPG: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shanghai SIPG scores 1.33 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.50 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shanghai SIPG 67%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%. Over 2.5: Shanghai SIPG 50%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.18. Shanghai SIPG: 12.7 shots per match, Chongqing Tongliang Long: 10.2.

Match halves

Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83. Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.17.

Goals by minute

Shanghai SIPG: 31-45+ (3 goals). Chongqing Tongliang Long: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Chinese Super League: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Shanghai SIPG has a clear offensive edge at home: they average 17 shots per match with 6 on target and score 2.33 goals with an average xG of 2.00, whereas Chongqing Tongliang Long away records only 6.5 shots, 2 on target, 0.5 goals and xG 0.73. The hosts maintain 63% possession on average and have not yet had a home game without scoring (0% matches without a goal), while the visitors fail to score in 50% of their away matches. On the other hand, Chongqing shows excellent overall form and consistency: they sit 2nd in the table with a record of 4 wins and 2 draws (0 losses) and average 2.6 points per match over the last 5 fixtures versus Shanghai’s 1.4 in the same period. Defensively the visitors are hard to break down away (0 goals conceded on average and 100% clean sheets), but their low finishing rate (conversion ~8%) and lower xG limit their threat in the final third. Considering the hosts’ dominance in volume and quality of chances (xG 2.00 vs 0.73; 17 vs 6.5 shots) and the fact the visitors often fail to score on the road, a home win is more likely, although a draw remains a realistic outcome given Chongqing’s good form.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The dominant signal comes from Chongqing: seasonally they have 100% clean sheets, average goals conceded 0.0 and season BTTS 0%, which strongly favors No Goal. Shanghai at home scores an average of 2.0 goals per match, has xG 1.4, 5.0 shots on target and a conversion rate of 17%, so they possess real attacking firepower. In the last 5 matches Chongqing scores on average 1.8 goals and concedes 0.8, while the league overall BTTS is 56% and hosts have 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches versus 40% for away teams, which gives some chance for Goal/Goal. Despite Shanghai’s offensive potential, the most important and unequivocal signal is Chongqing’s season-long defense (100% clean sheets, 0.0 conceded), therefore I assess No BTTS as more likely (65% vs 35%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I back Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: Shanghai SIPG averages 2.0 goals per game, and 75% of their matches have exceeded 1.5 goals, while Chongqing averages 0.5 goals per game. xG analysis indicates expected values around 1.22 for the home side (home xG 1.40 and xG against opponents 1.04) and around 0.82 for the visitors (away xG 0.73 and xG against home 0.91), totaling approximately 2.04 goals. The 2.5 line looks less certain: Shanghai has 50% of matches over 2.5, the visitors 0%, and the league records 54% of games over 2.5, so I estimate Over 2.5 at ~42% probability. Additionally, the hosts average 12 shots and 5 on target with 17% conversion, while the visitors only 6.5 shots and 2 on target with 8% conversion, which further supports the Over 1.5 forecast.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Shanghai SIPG have a seasonal goals-per-game of 2.0 versus 0.5 for Chongqing and higher xG of 1.40 versus 0.73, clearly indicating a home advantage in chance creation. The hosts average 12.0 shots and 5.0 shots on target with a conversion rate of 17%, while the visitors average 6.5 shots and 2.0 on target with an 8% conversion, so SIPG’s attacking efficiency is more than twice as high. In the last five matches SIPG led at the break in 40% of games, while the visitors did so in only 20%, with half-time goals averages of 0.5 for the hosts and 0.0 for the away side, which increases the likelihood of the home side leading after 45 minutes. Considering the seasonal 75% home-win rate and the advantage in xG and shots, the most reliable signal is SIPG to lead at half-time and win Full-Time, therefore I select 1/1 (34%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

71Possession (%)29
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
15Shots3
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
3Shots on target2
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1.84xG0.38
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
11Corners4
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
93Dangerous attacks6
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
9Fouls19
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1Cards2
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1.33Goals scored / match1.5
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1.17Goals conceded / match0.67
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
59%Average possession53%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
4Shots on target / match4
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.67Shots per match10.17
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
4Shots on target4
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
10.5%Shot conversion14.8%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
59%Possession53%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1.49xG for1.18
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1.56xG against0.95
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

Shooting quality

Shanghai SIPG: BalancedChongqing Tongliang Long: Efficient finishing
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
Accuracy (shots on target)32%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 86% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 2.6 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Shanghai SIPG
WLWLD
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
LWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Chongqing Tongliang Long
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.5 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Chongqing Tongliang Long is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 0.67 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Shanghai SIPG scoring profile: mixed

Shanghai SIPG scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

Chongqing Tongliang Long scoring profile: very strong

Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

8Goals scored (season)9
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
7Goals conceded (season)4
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
2.5Average goals in match2.17
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal83%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
33%2 goals50%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%3 goals17%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%4 goals0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal33%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%2 goals17%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0%3 goals17%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0%4 goals0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
Chongqing Tongliang Long - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.2 of 6 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%Scored in both halves0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
60%BTTS - last 540%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shanghai SIPG is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.17 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long

Shanghai SIPG - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing
Chongqing Tongliang Long - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.17
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.67
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
83%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
50%No goal before half-time83%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)2.17
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
17%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long
67%No goal after half-time33%
Shanghai SIPGChongqing Tongliang Long

Shanghai SIPG - second-half results

17% W33% D50% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results

67% W17% D17% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding394%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shanghai SIPG - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Chongqing Tongliang Long - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.40
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shanghai SIPG
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chongqing Tongliang Long
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shanghai SIPG

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Chongqing Tongliang Long

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
144%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).

Teams vs league

Shanghai SIPGLigaChongqing Tongliang Long
Average goals in match 2.502.84 2.17
Both teams scored 67%55% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%53% 33%
Clean sheets 0%25% 67%
Goal before half-time 50%63% 33%
Goal after half-time 83%88% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+73%
Home attack advantage
+42%
Home defence advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chongqing Tongliang LongGoalMichael Ngadeu-NgadjuiAssist: George Alexandru Cimpanu
  2. Chongqing Tongliang LongSubstitutionOn: Yuezheng DuOff: George Alexandru Cimpanu
  3. Chongqing Tongliang LongYellow cardZhenquan Li
  4. Chongqing Tongliang LongGoalChunxin Chen
  5. Shanghai SIPGYellow cardShenchao Wang
  6. Shanghai SIPGGoalXinxiang LiAssist: Shenchao Wang
  7. Chongqing Tongliang LongYellow cardIbrahim Amadou
  8. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Lei WuOff: Huan Fu
  9. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Xin YueOff: Shuai Li
  10. Shanghai SIPGSubstitutionOn: Ruofan LiuOff: Zhurun Liu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 1:2 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

Shanghai SIPG score 1.33 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.50. The Chinese Super League average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 33% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.

What form are Shanghai SIPG and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?

Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.