Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: match statistics
Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shanghai SIPG played Chongqing Tongliang Long in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 21 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Shanghai SIPG: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Chongqing Tongliang Long: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shanghai SIPG scores 1.33 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Chongqing Tongliang Long scores 1.50 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shanghai SIPG 67%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%. Over 2.5: Shanghai SIPG 50%, Chongqing Tongliang Long 33%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Shanghai SIPG has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.18. Shanghai SIPG: 12.7 shots per match, Chongqing Tongliang Long: 10.2.
Match halves
Shanghai SIPG: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83. Chongqing Tongliang Long: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.17.
Goals by minute
Shanghai SIPG: 31-45+ (3 goals). Chongqing Tongliang Long: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shanghai SIPG has a clear offensive edge at home: they average 17 shots per match with 6 on target and score 2.33 goals with an average xG of 2.00, whereas Chongqing Tongliang Long away records only 6.5 shots, 2 on target, 0.5 goals and xG 0.73. The hosts maintain 63% possession on average and have not yet had a home game without scoring (0% matches without a goal), while the visitors fail to score in 50% of their away matches. On the other hand, Chongqing shows excellent overall form and consistency: they sit 2nd in the table with a record of 4 wins and 2 draws (0 losses) and average 2.6 points per match over the last 5 fixtures versus Shanghai’s 1.4 in the same period. Defensively the visitors are hard to break down away (0 goals conceded on average and 100% clean sheets), but their low finishing rate (conversion ~8%) and lower xG limit their threat in the final third. Considering the hosts’ dominance in volume and quality of chances (xG 2.00 vs 0.73; 17 vs 6.5 shots) and the fact the visitors often fail to score on the road, a home win is more likely, although a draw remains a realistic outcome given Chongqing’s good form.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The dominant signal comes from Chongqing: seasonally they have 100% clean sheets, average goals conceded 0.0 and season BTTS 0%, which strongly favors No Goal. Shanghai at home scores an average of 2.0 goals per match, has xG 1.4, 5.0 shots on target and a conversion rate of 17%, so they possess real attacking firepower. In the last 5 matches Chongqing scores on average 1.8 goals and concedes 0.8, while the league overall BTTS is 56% and hosts have 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches versus 40% for away teams, which gives some chance for Goal/Goal. Despite Shanghai’s offensive potential, the most important and unequivocal signal is Chongqing’s season-long defense (100% clean sheets, 0.0 conceded), therefore I assess No BTTS as more likely (65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I back Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: Shanghai SIPG averages 2.0 goals per game, and 75% of their matches have exceeded 1.5 goals, while Chongqing averages 0.5 goals per game. xG analysis indicates expected values around 1.22 for the home side (home xG 1.40 and xG against opponents 1.04) and around 0.82 for the visitors (away xG 0.73 and xG against home 0.91), totaling approximately 2.04 goals. The 2.5 line looks less certain: Shanghai has 50% of matches over 2.5, the visitors 0%, and the league records 54% of games over 2.5, so I estimate Over 2.5 at ~42% probability. Additionally, the hosts average 12 shots and 5 on target with 17% conversion, while the visitors only 6.5 shots and 2 on target with 8% conversion, which further supports the Over 1.5 forecast.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Shanghai SIPG have a seasonal goals-per-game of 2.0 versus 0.5 for Chongqing and higher xG of 1.40 versus 0.73, clearly indicating a home advantage in chance creation. The hosts average 12.0 shots and 5.0 shots on target with a conversion rate of 17%, while the visitors average 6.5 shots and 2.0 on target with an 8% conversion, so SIPG’s attacking efficiency is more than twice as high. In the last five matches SIPG led at the break in 40% of games, while the visitors did so in only 20%, with half-time goals averages of 0.5 for the hosts and 0.0 for the away side, which increases the likelihood of the home side leading after 45 minutes. Considering the seasonal 75% home-win rate and the advantage in xG and shots, the most reliable signal is SIPG to lead at half-time and win Full-Time, therefore I select 1/1 (34%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shanghai SIPG | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 86% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 2.6 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.5 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Chongqing Tongliang Long is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Shanghai SIPG · 0.67 goals / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Shanghai SIPG scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Chongqing Tongliang Long keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).
Chongqing Tongliang Long scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shanghai SIPG
Over / Under - Chongqing Tongliang Long
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shanghai SIPG is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Shanghai SIPG · 1.17 pts / match - Chongqing Tongliang Long
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chongqing Tongliang Long - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shanghai SIPG
Chongqing Tongliang Long
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Shanghai SIPG | Liga | Chongqing Tongliang Long | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.50 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 55% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 63% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 88% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 1:2 Chongqing Tongliang Long. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
Shanghai SIPG score 1.33 goals per game on average and Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.50. The Chinese Super League average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 33% of Chongqing Tongliang Long's.
What form are Shanghai SIPG and Chongqing Tongliang Long in?
Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chongqing Tongliang Long 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Chongqing Tongliang Long?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


