Shelbourne vs Bohemians: match statistics
Shelbourne vs Bohemians: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shelbourne played Bohemians in Premier Division (Ireland). The match was played on 22 June 2026. Venue: Tolka Park. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Shelbourne: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Bohemians: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shelbourne scores 1.48 and concedes 1.38 goals per match. Bohemians scores 1.50 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.73 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shelbourne 76%, Bohemians 68%. Over 2.5: Shelbourne 62%, Bohemians 59%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Bohemians has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.56. Shelbourne: 14.1 shots per match, Bohemians: 15.2.
Match halves
Shelbourne: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.86. Bohemians: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.91.
Goals by minute
Shelbourne: 61-75 (9 goals). Bohemians: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier Division: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 2-3-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Bohemians are the favorites based on seasonal metrics: they have a 55% win rate away and score on average 1.73 goals per away match with a conversion rate of 11%, while Shelbourne win only 18% of home games and score 1.45 goals with a 9% conversion. The visitors’ defense looks more stable — Bohemians concede 1.18 goals per away game and record 45% clean sheets, whereas Shelbourne concede 1.64 at home and have 18% clean sheets. In the last 5 matches form edge favors the hosts: Shelbourne have 2 wins and 3 draws (PPG 1.8) while Bohemians in that period have 2 wins and 3 losses (PPG 1.2) and have conceded 11 goals in five games. xG shows balanced chance creation — Shelbourne xG for at home 1.71 versus 1.64 xG for Bohemians away — so the difference may come down to finishing and the ability to keep clean sheets. Given the visitors’ better season goal differential (33:27 versus 31:29) and higher away efficiency I assign 45% to a Bohemians win, 30% to a draw and 25% to a Shelbourne win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "Both Teams To Score" scenario appears more likely: Shelbourne has a seasonal BTTS rate of 82% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Bohemians have 55% for the season but 100% BTTS in their last 5 fixtures. In their last 5 games Bohemians scored 10 goals (2.0 per match) and conceded 11 (2.2 per match), whereas Shelbourne scored 7 goals (1.4 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0 per match), indicating high attacking activity from both sides and vulnerability in the visitors' defense. xG analysis supports this view: Shelbourne generates 1.74 xG per match while Bohemians allow 1.18 xG, and Bohemians have 1.64 xG with Shelbourne conceding 1.11 xG on average, so both teams are creating genuine chances. Additionally, the league average BTTS is 59%, and the over 2.5 goals rate is 55% at home and 64% away, further supporting a prediction of goals from both sides; therefore I assess BTTS - Yes at 72% vs 28% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals by averaging two approaches: seasonal xG (home 1.74 vs away defense 1.18 → 1.46; away 1.64 vs home defense 1.11 → 1.38) and form from the last 5 matches (home xG 1.54 vs away defense 1.41 → 1.48; away 1.73 vs home defense 1.26 → 1.50), yielding 1.47 for Shelbourne and 1.44 for Bohemians, total 2.91 goals. Seasonal metrics confirm a tendency for goals: Shelbourne have 82% of matches over 1.5 goals, Bohemians 64%, and both teams scoring in 82% (Shelbourne) and 55% (Bohemians) of matches. Additionally, both sides average about 15 shots per game (Shelbourne 15.18, Bohemians 15.27) and roughly 5.55/5.09 shots on target, which together with xG 1.74/1.64 indicates a realistic potential for at least 2 goals. A Poisson model with total expected goals 2.91 gives ~79% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~56% for 3+ (Over 2.5) and ~33% for 4+ (Over 3.5). Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 — it is the strongest signal: 79% probability per the model plus support from seasonal figures 82%/64% and a high rate of BTTS, while Over 2.5 (56%) and Over 3.5 (33%) are significantly less certain.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back a Half-Time draw and a Full-Time win for the visitors (X/2). Shelbourne ended the first half level in 55% of their home matches, and the average first-half goals are around 1.0–1.18 (AVGHT_home 1.0 vs AVGHT_away 1.18), which favors a split score at the break. After the break the favorites are Bohemians: they have a 55% win rate this season versus Shelbourne’s 27% and in the last 5 matches they led at the break in 60% of cases, demonstrating their ability to score quickly. Although xG gives Shelbourne a slight edge (1.74 vs 1.64), the visitors convert chances more efficiently (conversion rate 11% vs 8%), and 91% of Shelbourne’s matches had at least one goal in the second half compared to 73% for Bohemians, increasing the chances of a turnaround by the visitors after the interval. Therefore the strongest signal from the data points to a Half-Time draw and a Full-Time win for the visitors.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shelbourne | Bohemians | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shelbourne is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Shelbourne · 1.2 pts / match - Bohemians
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Bohemians is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.38 goals / match - Shelbourne · 1.23 goals / match - Bohemians
Shelbourne scores in 86% of matches (18 of 21 matches), while Bohemians keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).
Bohemians scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Shelbourne keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shelbourne
Over / Under - Bohemians
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Bohemians is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / match - Shelbourne · 1.41 pts / match - Bohemians
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shelbourne - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Bohemians - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shelbourne
Bohemians
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Division).
Teams vs league
| Shelbourne | Liga | Bohemians | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.86 | 2.73 | • 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 59% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 51% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | • 24% | 25% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 72% | • 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 78% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Shelbourne 2 - 3 - 1 Bohemians. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shelbourne vs Bohemians?
The Premier Division match finished Shelbourne 0:3 Bohemians. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shelbourne and Bohemians?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Shelbourne won 2, Bohemians won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shelbourne vs Bohemians?
Shelbourne score 1.48 goals per game on average and Bohemians 1.50. The Premier Division average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Shelbourne's matches and 68% of Bohemians's.
What form are Shelbourne and Bohemians in?
Over the last 5 games Shelbourne have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Bohemians 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shelbourne vs Bohemians?
The statistical background for Shelbourne vs Bohemians — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


