Shenyang Urban vs Beijing Guoan: match statistics
Shenyang Urban vs Beijing Guoan: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shenyang Urban played Beijing Guoan in Chinese Super League (China). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Shenyang Urban: 1-0-2, 1.00 points/match. Beijing Guoan: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shenyang Urban scores 1.00 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Beijing Guoan scores 1.33 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.16 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shenyang Urban 0%, Beijing Guoan 67%. Over 2.5: Shenyang Urban 67%, Beijing Guoan 33%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Beijing Guoan has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.14. Shenyang Urban: 11.3 shots per match, Beijing Guoan: 12.0.
Match halves
Shenyang Urban: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Beijing Guoan: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Shenyang Urban: 76-90+ (2 goals). Beijing Guoan: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Chinese Super League: 3.16 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1) — Shenyang Urban averages 3.0 goals per home game with 100% wins and 100% clean sheets at home, while Beijing Guoan average 1.5 goals away and 50% wins on the road. The hosts register 15 shots per game with 5 on target and a 20% conversion rate, versus the visitors' 12 shots with 3.5 on target and 13% conversion, giving a clear advantage in shot quality for Shenyang (15 vs 12, 5 vs 3.5, 20% vs 13%). In xG terms Shenyang have 1.53 xG per home match with 1.08 xG against, while Beijing have 1.48 xG with 1.19 xG against, indicating a marginally better offensive and defensive efficiency for the hosts (1.53 vs 1.48 and 1.08 vs 1.19). In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 9 goals, the visitors 7, and both teams average 1.4 points per game in that period, so Shenyang’s edge stems mainly from home form and higher conversion. Based on these figures I assess the probabilities as 65% for the hosts, 20% draw and 15% for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In the last 5 matches Shenyang averages 1.8 goals scored and concedes 1.0, while Beijing averages 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, indicating both teams recently create and concede chances. BTTS signals are mixed: last5 BTTS is 20% for the home side and 60% for the away side, but seasonally Shenyang at home has BTTS 100% with 0% clean sheets expected, whereas Beijing has seasonal BTTS 50% and 50% clean sheets on the road. xG and shots confirm both teams’ goal potential — xG_for 1.36 vs 1.48, xG_against 0.71 vs 1.19 and on average 3.0 and 3.5 shots on target, with conversion 8% for the hosts and 13% for the visitors. Additionally the league has BTTS 54% with an average 3.04 goals per match, so combining the home side’s seasonal 100% BTTS, similar xG and recent goal averages 1.8 vs 1.4, I assign 65% to BTTS - Yes and 35% to No Goal — the scenario of both teams scoring appears stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Forecast based on xG and statistics: expected xG are 1.28 for Shenyang Urban and 1.09 for Beijing Guoan, totaling 2.37 goals. Seasonally both teams have 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals (home 100% and away 100%), and the league averages 3.04 goals per game, so Over 1.5 has a strong basis. The 2.5 line is more balanced: seasonally the home team has 0% Over 2.5 vs 50% for the visitors, but in the last 5 matches the home side has 60% Over 2.5 and the visitors 40%, therefore I give a slight edge to Over 2.5. Over 3.5 looks unlikely: seasonally both teams have 0% Over 3.5, and conversion rates (8% home vs 13% away) together with averages of 3.0 and 3.5 shots on target limit the chances of a high-scoring game. Therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most consistent signal, while the 2.5 line remains balanced with a slight lean towards Over.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The data show a clear pattern: the home side led at the break in 1 of 1 matches (100%) and average 1.0 goals at half-time versus 0.5 for the visitors, so a home lead at the break is a strong signal. However, the visitors dominate after the break: they score 1.0 goals on average in the second half while the hosts concede 1.0 on average after the break, with second-half average goals of 2.0 for the visitors versus 1.0 for the hosts. Additionally, the visitors’ xG is 1.48 versus 1.36 for the hosts, and conversion efficiency is 13% for the visitors versus 8% for the hosts with 3.5 shots on target for visitors vs. 3.0 for hosts, which increases the likelihood of a comeback. Seasonal figures also favor the visitors: the visitors’ season scoring average is 1.5 versus 1.0 for the hosts, and the visitors’ win rate is 50% compared to 0% for the hosts. Therefore I assign the highest single probability to the scenario of the home side leading at half-time and the visitors winning the match (HT/FT 1/2 — 30%), with 18% on 1/1 and the remaining weights distributed among other possible outcomes.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shenyang Urban | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 24% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beijing Guoan is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Shenyang Urban · 1.33 pts / match - Beijing Guoan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beijing Guoan is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Shenyang Urban · 1.33 goals / match - Beijing Guoan
Beijing Guoan is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.33 goals / match - Shenyang Urban · 1 goals / match - Beijing Guoan
Shenyang Urban scores in 33% of matches (1 of 3 matches), while Beijing Guoan keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
Beijing Guoan scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Shenyang Urban keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shenyang Urban
Over / Under - Beijing Guoan
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beijing Guoan is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Shenyang Urban · 2.33 pts / match - Beijing Guoan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shenyang Urban - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Beijing Guoan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shenyang Urban
Beijing Guoan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Shenyang Urban | Liga | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.33 | 3.16 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Shenyang Urban vs Beijing Guoan?
The Chinese Super League match finished Shenyang Urban 2:1 Beijing Guoan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shenyang Urban vs Beijing Guoan?
Shenyang Urban score 1.00 goals per game on average and Beijing Guoan 1.33. The Chinese Super League average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Shenyang Urban's matches and 67% of Beijing Guoan's.
What form are Shenyang Urban and Beijing Guoan in?
Over the last 5 games Shenyang Urban have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Beijing Guoan 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shenyang Urban vs Beijing Guoan?
The statistical background for Shenyang Urban vs Beijing Guoan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.