Shirak vs Ararat: match statistics
Shirak vs Ararat: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shirak played Ararat in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 1 May 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Shirak: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Ararat: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shirak scores 0.73 and concedes 1.91 goals per match. Ararat scores 0.65 and concedes 2.30. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shirak 41%, Ararat 39%. Over 2.5: Shirak 50%, Ararat 57%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Ararat has higher xG: 1.23 vs 0.98. Shirak: 8.2 shots per match, Ararat: 10.9.
Match halves
Shirak: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.32. Ararat: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.35.
Goals by minute
Shirak: 16-30 (4 goals). Ararat: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Armenian Premier League: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Shirak) because their home metrics are superior in key areas. Shirak concedes 1.55 goals per home match on average, while Ararat concedes 2.92 on the road; the seasonal difference (42 goals conceded vs 53) confirms the visitors’ weaker defense. Ararat registers more shots (11.08 vs 8.45) and higher average xG (1.19 vs 1.00), but their conversion rate is only 6% versus Shirak’s 10%, resulting in lower average goals (0.67 vs 0.82). In the last 5 matches Shirak have 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, averaging 0.4 points per game, while Ararat have 1 win and 4 losses, averaging 0.6 points per game; both teams are in poor form, but the visitors concede more often (11 conceded in 5 matches vs 9 for Shirak). Additionally, Ararat have 0% clean sheets away compared to Shirak’s 18% at home, which increases the likelihood that the hosts will maintain a narrow lead.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Shirak averages 0.64 goals scored and concedes 1.64 per match, while Ararat scores 0.67 and concedes 2.92, indicating low offensive efficiency for both teams despite Ararat’s defensive vulnerability. Combined xG is 1.28 + 1.19 = 2.47 versus a league average of 2.56 goals per match, but shot conversion is only 6% with averages of 3.0 and 3.33 shots on target, so attacking opportunities do not directly translate into goals. Seasonal BTTS rates are 36% for Shirak and 42% for Ararat, and in the last 5 matches both teams had BTTS in 40%—meaning BTTS is possible but not dominant in their results. Ararat has no clean sheets (0%) and concedes 2.92 goals on average, which increases the likelihood the opponent will score, yet Ararat only scores 0.67 goals themselves, and Shirak scored 3 goals in their last 5 matches (0.6 per match), so realistically a no-goal-for-one outcome is more common. Based on this I suggest a 40% yes / 60% no split and recommend 'No' as the more probable selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have defensive issues: Ararat concedes on average 2.92 goals per match, Shirak 1.64, and the percentage of games over 1.5 goals is 100% for Ararat and 64% for Shirak, indicating a high probability of at least 2 goals. xG analysis confirms the attacking potential: Shirak generates 1.28 xG, Ararat 1.19 xG; accounting for xG against (1.73 for Ararat and 1.48 for Shirak) I estimate ~1.50 goals for Shirak and ~1.33 for Ararat, total 2.83. In the last 5 matches Shirak scored 3 and conceded 9 goals (avg. 0.6 scored and 1.8 conceded per match), Ararat 4 scored and 11 conceded (0.8/2.2), which further increases the likelihood of goals in this fixture. Despite low conversion rates (6% for both) both teams average approximately 10.64 and 11.08 shots per match and have low clean sheet percentages (18% and 0%), therefore I assign 82% to Over 1.5, 60% to Over 2.5 and 31% to Over 3.5; the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics indicate that the most likely score at 45 minutes is a draw – Shirak were level at the break in 6 of 11 home matches (55%) and never led at half-time (0 of 11), while Ararat led at the break in only 1 of 12 away matches (8%). In second halves the advantage may shift to the hosts: Ararat concedes on average 2.92 goals per match and 1.83 goals after the break in away fixtures, whereas Shirak scores on average 0.45 goals after the break and collects more points in second halves (an average of 1.09 points versus 0.58 for Ararat). Additionally, Shirak’s xG is 1.28 compared to Ararat’s 1.19, and chance volume is similar (average shots 10.64 vs 11.08 and shots on target 3.0 vs 3.33), which suggests the hosts have a realistic chance to score after the interval. On this basis I select X/1 (draw at half-time, home win at full-time) as the strongest signal and assign it a 33% probability; the distribution of the remaining scenarios is 1/1=0%, 1/X=0%, 1/2=0%, X/X=17%, X/2=5%, 2/1=23%, 2/X=12%, 2/2=10%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shirak | Ararat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Ararat is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Shirak · 0.6 pts / match - Ararat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shirak is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
0.73 goals / match - Shirak · 0.65 goals / match - Ararat
Shirak is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.91 goals / match - Shirak · 2.3 goals / match - Ararat
Shirak scores in 45% of matches (10 of 22 matches), while Ararat keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 matches).
Ararat scores in 43% of matches (10 of 23 matches), while Shirak keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shirak
Over / Under - Ararat
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shirak is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / match - Shirak · 0.57 pts / match - Ararat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shirak - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 9%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Ararat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shirak
Ararat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Shirak | Liga | Ararat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.64 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 47% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 31% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 79% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Shirak 1 - 1 - 0 Ararat. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shirak vs Ararat?
The Armenian Premier League match finished Shirak 0:2 Ararat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shirak and Ararat?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shirak won 1, Ararat won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shirak vs Ararat?
Shirak score 0.73 goals per game on average and Ararat 0.65. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Shirak's matches and 39% of Ararat's.
What form are Shirak and Ararat in?
Over the last 5 games Shirak have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Ararat 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shirak vs Ararat?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shirak vs Ararat: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


