Shire Endaselassie vs Arba Minch Kenema: match statistics
Shire Endaselassie holds a clear advantage as the host of this encounter. Arba Minch Kenema has not won a single away match this season (0% Win%), recording only draws and losses, making them the weakest team in the league in 20th position. The hosts, despite average form (25% Win% at home), have a better goal difference in home matches (-1 vs -5 for the visitors) and higher scoring efficiency (0.63 vs 0.5 goals per match). Arba Minch Kenema has not scored a single goal in their last five matches, which, combined with a 50% FTS% (Failed to Score) on the road, indicates serious offensive problems. Considering xG statistics (0.92 vs 1.11 for the visitors), the visitors theoretically create slightly better chances, but their inefficiency (8% Shot Conversion Rate) and lack of away wins favor a home victory. A draw remains a realistic option due to Arba Minch's high tendency to draw (63% Draw%) and the poor form of both teams in the last five matches (0.6 PPG).
Shire Endaselassie vs Arba Minch Kenema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shire Endaselassie played Arba Minch Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 21 January 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Shire Endaselassie: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Arba Minch Kenema: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shire Endaselassie scores 0.80 and concedes 0.87 goals per match. Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.33 and concedes 1.07. League average: 1.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shire Endaselassie 33%, Arba Minch Kenema 33%. Over 2.5: Shire Endaselassie 27%, Arba Minch Kenema 13%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 29%.
xG, shots and style
Arba Minch Kenema has higher xG: 1.02 vs 0.99. Shire Endaselassie: 5.9 shots per match, Arba Minch Kenema: 5.4.
Match halves
Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.27. Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.13.
Goals by minute
Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (3 goals). Arba Minch Kenema: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.77 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 29%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shire Endaselassie holds a clear advantage as the host of this encounter. Arba Minch Kenema has not won a single away match this season (0% Win%), recording only draws and losses, making them the weakest team in the league in 20th position. The hosts, despite average form (25% Win% at home), have a better goal difference in home matches (-1 vs -5 for the visitors) and higher scoring efficiency (0.63 vs 0.5 goals per match). Arba Minch Kenema has not scored a single goal in their last five matches, which, combined with a 50% FTS% (Failed to Score) on the road, indicates serious offensive problems. Considering xG statistics (0.92 vs 1.11 for the visitors), the visitors theoretically create slightly better chances, but their inefficiency (8% Shot Conversion Rate) and lack of away wins favor a home victory. A draw remains a realistic option due to Arba Minch's high tendency to draw (63% Draw%) and the poor form of both teams in the last five matches (0.6 PPG).
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shire Endaselassie | Arba Minch Kenema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shire Endaselassie is 142% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.33 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema
Shire Endaselassie is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.87 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 1.07 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema
Shire Endaselassie scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).
Arba Minch Kenema scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shire Endaselassie
Over / Under - Arba Minch Kenema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shire Endaselassie is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie · 1 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shire Endaselassie - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shire Endaselassie
Arba Minch Kenema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Shire Endaselassie | Liga | Arba Minch Kenema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.67 | 1.77 | ▼ 1.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 44% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 29% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | • 40% | 39% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 58% | ▼ 47% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Shire Endaselassie vs Arba Minch Kenema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Shire Endaselassie 1:0 Arba Minch Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shire Endaselassie vs Arba Minch Kenema?
Shire Endaselassie score 0.80 goals per game on average and Arba Minch Kenema 0.33. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Shire Endaselassie's matches and 33% of Arba Minch Kenema's.
What form are Shire Endaselassie and Arba Minch Kenema in?
Over the last 5 games Shire Endaselassie have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Arba Minch Kenema 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shire Endaselassie vs Arba Minch Kenema?
The statistical background for Shire Endaselassie vs Arba Minch Kenema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.