Shire Endaselassie vs Dire Dawa Kenema: match statistics
Shire Endaselassie vs Dire Dawa Kenema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shire Endaselassie played Dire Dawa Kenema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Shire Endaselassie: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Dire Dawa Kenema: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shire Endaselassie scores 0.68 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Dire Dawa Kenema scores 0.64 and concedes 1.04. League average: 1.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shire Endaselassie 32%, Dire Dawa Kenema 36%. Over 2.5: Shire Endaselassie 20%, Dire Dawa Kenema 28%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
xG, shots and style
Dire Dawa Kenema has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.97. Shire Endaselassie: 5.7 shots per match, Dire Dawa Kenema: 6.8.
Match halves
Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.32. Dire Dawa Kenema: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (4 goals). Dire Dawa Kenema: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.78 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shire Endaselassie has a slight edge defensively and in form: at home they concede on average 0.67 goals per match and keep 50% clean sheets, while Dire Dawa Kenema concede 1.0 goals away and have only 33% clean sheets. Offensively both teams are weak — hosts score 0.75 goals at home versus 0.67 for visitors away; xG is 0.96 for Shire and 0.97 for Dire Dawa, but the hosts have better shot conversion (13% vs 10%) and a lower share of matches without a goal (FTS 42% vs 50%). In the last 5 matches Shire scored 4 goals and average 1 point per game, whereas Dire Dawa scored 3 goals and average 0.8 points per game, confirming a minimal home advantage in form. A major factor is the high draw rate: Shire record 42% draws at home and Dire Dawa 50% draws away, and the combined goals average is low (1.42 for the hosts vs 1.67 for the visitors), so I expect an even, low-scoring game. On that basis I tip a home win — Shire win 33% of matches at home versus Dire Dawa 25% away, so I assign them a higher chance of triumph.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistical analysis indicates both teams are poor offensively: Shire Endaselassie averages 0.62 goals per match, Dire Dawa Kenema 0.67, while conceding 1.08 and 1.00 goals per match respectively. Seasonal BTTS rates are low — home side has BTTS in 31% of matches, away side 42%, yielding a pair average around 36%, below the league average of 41%. In the last 5 fixtures Shire had BTTS in 60% versus 40% for Dire Dawa, but across those five rounds the two teams scored only 4 and 3 goals (0.8 and 0.6 per match) and conceded 6 each (1.2 per match). xG suggests some chance creation (1.13 vs 0.97 xG), yet low finishing (9% and 10% conversion) and only 3.0 and 2.5 shots on target per match indicate chances rarely translate into goal exchanges, so BTTS - No is more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal indicators show the home side scores over 1.5 goals in 69% of matches and the away side in 58%, giving an average of ~63.5% when comparing both teams. A model combining xG (xG for home 1.13 and xG against away 1.22; xG for away 0.97 and xG against home 1.19) and actual goal averages (0.62 and 0.67) leads to expected goals of 0.90 for Shire Endaselassie and 0.88 for Dire Dawa Kenema, total 1.78. The Poisson distribution for a total of 1.78 yields roughly a 53% chance of at least 2 goals, but accounting for seasonal over1.5 rates (69%/58%) and shot counts 7.0 vs 6.67 and on-target 3.0 vs 2.5 I increase the final probability for Over 1.5 to 62%. Over 2.5 looks weaker (seasonal 31% for home and 25% for away, Poisson ~26% for 3+ goals — I assign 27%), and Over 3.5 is rare (seasonal 0%/8%, Poisson ~11% — I maintain Under 3.5 at 89%). The strongest signal from the data is therefore a play on Over 1.5 due to high seasonal rates and a moderate expected total of 1.78 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal from the data indicates a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X). Home teams were level at the break in 54% of matches, and away teams in 42%, with a very low average of first-half goals: home 0.15, away 0.33, which favors goalless or low-scoring draws in the first half. Full-time draws are also frequent (homes involved in draws in 38% of matches, aways in 50%), and the league’s clean sheet rate is 81%, limiting the number of full-time decisive results. The second half generates more goals (on average 1.08 home goals in the 2nd half versus 0.83 for away; homes score 0.46 in the second half vs 0.33 for aways), so turnarounds remain possible, but this does not outweigh the dominant draw signal. Therefore I assign the X/X outcome the highest probability (30%), with main alternatives being X/1 (12%) and away leading at the break and winning at full-time (2/2, 20%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shire Endaselassie | Dire Dawa Kenema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shire Endaselassie is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.8 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shire Endaselassie is 6% better for: goals scored per match.
0.68 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.64 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema
Shire Endaselassie is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 1.04 goals / match - Dire Dawa Kenema
Shire Endaselassie scores in 48% of matches (12 of 25 matches), while Dire Dawa Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 matches).
Dire Dawa Kenema scores in 44% of matches (11 of 25 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shire Endaselassie
Over / Under - Dire Dawa Kenema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shire Endaselassie is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.96 pts / match - Dire Dawa Kenema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shire Endaselassie - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Dire Dawa Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shire Endaselassie
Dire Dawa Kenema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Shire Endaselassie | Liga | Dire Dawa Kenema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.48 | 1.78 | ▼ 1.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 41% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 27% | • 28% |
| Clean sheets | • 40% | 40% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Dire Dawa KenemaGoalMohammednur Nasir
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Shire Endaselassie 1 - 0 - 0 Dire Dawa Kenema. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shire Endaselassie vs Dire Dawa Kenema?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Shire Endaselassie 0:1 Dire Dawa Kenema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shire Endaselassie vs Dire Dawa Kenema?
Shire Endaselassie score 0.68 goals per game on average and Dire Dawa Kenema 0.64. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Shire Endaselassie's matches and 36% of Dire Dawa Kenema's.
What form are Shire Endaselassie and Dire Dawa Kenema in?
Over the last 5 games Shire Endaselassie have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Dire Dawa Kenema 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shire Endaselassie vs Dire Dawa Kenema?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


