Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueData current as of 07 September 2026

Shire Endaselassie vs Fasil Ketema: match statistics

130%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced encounter with a high probability of a draw. Shire Endaselassie sits 12th in the table and shows poor recent form (1 win in the last 5 matches), though they can rely on defensive stability at home (55% clean sheets). Fasil Ketema, despite a higher position (5th place), is experiencing a slump in form with 4 losses in the last 5 matches and just 0.2 points per match. The guests are characterized by a high percentage of away draws (55%), which, given the poor current disposition of both teams and identical goal differences (+1), argues for a share of the points. Low xG figures for both squads (0.97 vs 1.2) and a high percentage of matches without goals scored suggest a cautious, tight encounter ending in a draw.

Shire Endaselassie vs Fasil Ketema: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shire Endaselassie played Fasil Ketema in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 9 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Shire Endaselassie: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Fasil Ketema: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shire Endaselassie scores 0.68 and concedes 0.73 goals per match. Fasil Ketema scores 0.73 and concedes 0.64. League average: 1.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shire Endaselassie 27%, Fasil Ketema 27%. Over 2.5: Shire Endaselassie 23%, Fasil Ketema 14%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.

xG, shots and style

Fasil Ketema has higher xG: 1.14 vs 1.00. Shire Endaselassie: 6.2 shots per match, Fasil Ketema: 7.4.

Match halves

Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.27. Fasil Ketema: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (4 goals). Fasil Ketema: 31-45+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.76 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 27%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a balanced encounter with a high probability of a draw. Shire Endaselassie sits 12th in the table and shows poor recent form (1 win in the last 5 matches), though they can rely on defensive stability at home (55% clean sheets). Fasil Ketema, despite a higher position (5th place), is experiencing a slump in form with 4 losses in the last 5 matches and just 0.2 points per match. The guests are characterized by a high percentage of away draws (55%), which, given the poor current disposition of both teams and identical goal differences (+1), argues for a share of the points. Low xG figures for both squads (0.97 vs 1.2) and a high percentage of matches without goals scored suggest a cautious, tight encounter ending in a draw.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
2Shots6
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
1Shots on target4
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.77xG1.26
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
4Corners1
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
78Dangerous attacks81
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
-1Fouls-1
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
-1Cards-1
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.68Goals scored / match0.73
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.73Goals conceded / match0.64
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
47%Average possession44%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
2.64Shots on target / match2.59
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.18Shots per match7.41
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
2.64Shots on target2.59
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
11%Shot conversion9.8%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
47%Possession44%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
1xG for1.14
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
1.19xG against1.1
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

Shooting quality

Shire Endaselassie: BalancedFasil Ketema: Balanced
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
Accuracy (shots on target)43%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shire Endaselassie is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.2 pts / match - Fasil Ketema

Shire Endaselassie
DDLWL
Season result split
27% W36% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-8
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Fasil Ketema
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W41% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-6-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fasil Ketema is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.68 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.73 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Fasil Ketema is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.73 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie · 0.64 goals / match - Fasil Ketema

Shire Endaselassie scoring profile: more difficult

Shire Endaselassie scores in 45% of matches (10 of 22 matches), while Fasil Ketema keeps a clean sheet in 59% (13 of 22 matches).

Fasil Ketema scoring profile: mixed

Fasil Ketema scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 45% (10 of 22 matches).

15Goals scored (season)16
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
16Goals conceded (season)14
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
1.41Average goals in match1.36
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
2Goals scored (last 5)2
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
3Goals conceded (last 5)7
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

How often they score at least...

45%1 goal59%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
18%2 goals9%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
5%3 goals5%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal41%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
14%2 goals18%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
5%3 goals5%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0%4 goals0%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

27%
Shire Endaselassie - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 22 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time9%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0%BTTS in both halves5%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
14%Scored in both halves5%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
20%BTTS - last 540%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time32%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

2nd half

45%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shire Endaselassie - half-time state
27% leading55% draw18% trailing
Fasil Ketema - half-time state
23% leading73% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.41
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.32
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.32Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.73Average goals (1st half)0.45
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
73%Clean sheet before half-time86%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
64%No goal before half-time73%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.27Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
0.68Average goals (2nd half)0.91
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
68%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema
77%No goal after half-time64%
Shire EndaselassieFasil Ketema

Shire Endaselassie - second-half results

18% W59% R23% P
30
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Fasil Ketema - second-half results

23% W50% R27% P
31
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shire Endaselassie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Fasil Ketema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shire Endaselassie
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Fasil Ketema
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
2
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.39
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
27%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shire Endaselassie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Fasil Ketema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Shire EndaselassieLigaFasil Ketema
Average goals in match 1.411.76 1.36
Both teams scored 27%41% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 23%27% 14%
Clean sheets 45%40% 59%
Goal before half-time 50%54% 32%
Goal after half-time 45%58% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.76
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.89
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shire Endaselassie 0 - 0 - 1 Fasil Ketema. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Fasil Ketema
1 : 0
Shire Endaselassie

FAQ

What was the result of Shire Endaselassie vs Fasil Ketema?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Shire Endaselassie 1:1 Fasil Ketema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shire Endaselassie vs Fasil Ketema?

Shire Endaselassie score 0.68 goals per game on average and Fasil Ketema 0.73. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 27% of Shire Endaselassie's matches and 27% of Fasil Ketema's.

What form are Shire Endaselassie and Fasil Ketema in?

Over the last 5 games Shire Endaselassie have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Fasil Ketema 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shire Endaselassie vs Fasil Ketema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.