Shire Endaselassie vs Sheger Ketema: match statistics

I predict a draw (X) due to balanced metrics and both teams drawing in 35% of their matches. Shire Endaselassie has a very solid home defence — conceding only 0.65 goals per game on average and keeping a clean sheet in 47% of home matches, but scoring just 0.71 goals per game (24 goals this season); Sheger Ketema have better offensive figures this season (32 goals) and a higher xG of 1.22 versus the hosts' 0.93. The visitors generate more chances (avg. 8.47 shots away vs 5.29 for the hosts) with a similar number of shots on target (2.29 vs 2.18) and the same conversion rate of 13%, so they have the edge in chance creation but not necessarily in finishing. In the short term the hosts have scored 5 goals in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 points per game in that period, while the visitors have 3 goals and 1.4 points, which slightly increases the probability of a split of points and a low-scoring game. Additionally, the hosts fail to score in 41% of home matches, whereas the visitors fail to score in only 24% of away games, so despite better chance creation Sheger may run into a compact defence — hence a draw as the most likely outcome.

Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 42% (home) and 41% (away), close to the league average of 40%. However, in the last 5 matches BTTS dropped to 20% for the home side and 0% for the away side; over that period average goals scored are 1.0 for home and 0.6 for away, indicating a limited number of matches where both teams score. Additionally, the home team has kept a clean sheet in 53% of matches, the away team in 41%, while the league clean sheet rate is as high as 81%, and over 2.5 percentages are low — 21% and 24% — all of which favor a No BTTS scenario. From an xG quality perspective they average 1.02 and 1.22 xG (total 2.24), but actual goals per match are 0.74 and 1.06 (total 1.80), suggesting poorer finishing and reduced chances for both teams to score. On this basis I rate No BTTS as more likely: 65% No BTTS and 35% BTTS.

Calculated xG yields approximately 1.11 for the home side (1.02 home attacking xG + 1.19 average xG conceded by the visitors) and 1.13 for the visitors (1.22 visitors' attacking xG + 1.04 average xG conceded by the home side), totaling ~2.24 expected goals. With a mean of 2.24 the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 66% (P(0)+P(1)≈0.34), and I estimate Over 2.5 at roughly 39%. Season figures confirm a moderate scoring environment: homes score on average 0.74 goals, visitors 1.06, and Over 2.5 occurs in only 21% of home matches and 24% of away matches, which supports the Under 2.5. Both teams have similar shots on target 2.32 vs 2.29 and the share of matches where both teams scored is around 42%/41%, so I do not expect an excessive number of scoring situations. Based on this data the strongest signal is Over 1.5, while the 2.5 and 3.5 lines show an advantage for the Under.

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome – the home side were level at the break in 79% of matches and the visitors in 59%, giving an average of about a 69% chance of an HT draw. After the break the visitors clearly dominate: the visitors’ second-half goals average 1.53 versus 0.63 for the hosts, and 82% of visitors’ matches feature at least one goal after the break versus 42% for hosts. Additionally, visitors score an average of 1.06 goals per match versus 0.74 for hosts and have higher xG: 1.22 vs 1.02, as well as a higher win rate 35% vs 21% for hosts, suggesting visitors are more likely to produce a turnaround after the break. At the same time, the high proportion of clean halves (HT) – 74% for hosts and 71% for visitors – and the low average goals at half-time (0.42 and 0.29) support a scenario of a draw at half-time with the match being decided in the second half. Based on this I select X/2 as the strongest signal (34%), with a significant but smaller chance of an eventual draw (X/X 20%) or a turnaround in favour of the hosts after a draw (X/1 12%).