Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 13 September 2026

Shooting Stars vs Kwara United: match statistics

Shooting Stars crest
Shooting Stars
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Kwara United crest
Kwara United

Shooting Stars vs Kwara United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Shooting Stars played Kwara United in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Shooting Stars: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Kwara United: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Shooting Stars scores 1.06 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Kwara United scores 0.88 and concedes 0.88. League average: 1.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Shooting Stars 39%, Kwara United 33%. Over 2.5: Shooting Stars 33%, Kwara United 24%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 29%.

xG, shots and style

Shooting Stars has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.04. Shooting Stars: 6.8 shots per match, Kwara United: 4.1.

Match halves

Shooting Stars: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.52. Kwara United: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Shooting Stars: 76-90+ (11 goals). Kwara United: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 29%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1) — Shooting Stars have a clear home advantage: they have won 81% of home matches, possess a +17 home goal difference and average 1.81 goals per home game. Offensively the hosts create more and higher-quality chances: 11.08 average shots per match and 3.75 on target versus Kwara United’s 6.7 and 2.4, with the hosts’ shot conversion at 16% compared to just 6% for the visitors. Differences in expected chance value also favor the hosts — average home xG for the hosts is 1.51, while Kwara’s away xG is 0.92. Defensively the hosts concede 0.75 goals per home match with an average xG against of 0.79 and keep a clean sheet in 38% of games, whereas Kwara concede 1.38 goals away with xG against of 1.66 and only 13% clean sheets. Although Kwara United have a better recent points average over the last five matches (2.0 vs 1.8) and also 3 wins in their last 5, their high rate of failing to score away (63% of away matches without a goal) severely limits their realistic chances.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick 'No' (no BTTS) because Shooting Stars have a seasonal average of 1.24 goals scored and only 0.41 conceded per match and keep a clean sheet in 59% of home games, while Kwara United average just 0.50 goals away. Seasonal BTTS rates are 29% for hosts and 38% for visitors, with league BTTS at 37%, so both teams scoring simultaneously is relatively uncommon. xG data shows Shooting Stars create 1.20 xG per match, whereas Kwara generate 0.92 xG on the road while conceding 1.66 xG; despite that Kwara have a low conversion of 6% with on average 6.7 shots and 2.4 shots on target. Last 5 matches give mixed signals (hosts 8 scored and 6 conceded, visitors 7:4), however the hosts’ long-term defensive edge (0.41 conceded and 59% clean sheets) and Kwara’s poor finishing (0.50 goals per match) argue against BTTS. I estimate probability for 'No' at about 70% versus 30% for 'Yes', therefore the strongest signal from the data is a 'No' bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG and statistical analysis I estimated goals: home xG 1.20 vs away xG conceded 1.66 — the mean gives ~1.43 expected goals for Shooting Stars; for Kwara United attack xG is 0.92 and xG conceded by the home side is 0.93, yielding ~0.93, total = 2.36 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.36 yields ~68% probability for Over 1.5, 42% for Over 2.5 and only ~21% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 is the statistically stronger scenario. Seasonal percentages corroborate a conservative match profile: Over 2.5 occurred for the home team in only 24% of matches and for the away team in 25%, while Over 3.5 was just 6% and 19% (Under 3.5: 94% and 81%). Additionally, Shooting Stars average 1.24 goals scored at home and only 0.41 conceded, with 59% clean sheets, which reduces the risk of a very high-scoring game. Although both teams have scored more often in their last 5 matches (last 5: 8 and 7 goals scored), the hosts’ dominant defensive metrics and the low seasonal frequency of matches above 3.5 goals make Under 3.5 the best signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Shooting Stars lead at the break in 53% of home matches (9 times) and average 0.65 goals scored by half-time while conceding only 0.06, which strongly favors them in the first half. Kwara United average 0.38 goals scored by half-time and concede 0.88; away they have only a 6% win rate and 0% leads at the break, so their chances of taking the lead before half-time are minimal. Over the full match Shooting Stars win 59% of home games, have xG_for 1.2 versus visitors’ xG 0.92 and average 10.25 shots (3.38 on target) compared to Kwara’s 6.7 (2.4), indicating game control and better chance conversion. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet at half-time in 94% of home fixtures and score on average 0.59 goals in second halves while conceding 0.35, therefore the most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Shooting StarsKwara United
17Shots3
Shooting StarsKwara United
4Shots on target1
Shooting StarsKwara United
1.73xG0.48
Shooting StarsKwara United
6Corners2
Shooting StarsKwara United
53Dangerous attacks30
Shooting StarsKwara United
-1Fouls-1
Shooting StarsKwara United
-1Cards-1
Shooting StarsKwara United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Shooting StarsKwara United
1.06Goals scored / match0.88
Shooting StarsKwara United
1.09Goals conceded / match0.88
Shooting StarsKwara United
35%Average possession27%
Shooting StarsKwara United
2Shots on target / match1.09
Shooting StarsKwara United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.79Shots per match4.06
Shooting StarsKwara United
2Shots on target1.09
Shooting StarsKwara United
15.6%Shot conversion21.6%
Shooting StarsKwara United
35%Possession27%
Shooting StarsKwara United
1.3xG for1.04
Shooting StarsKwara United
1.22xG against1.33
Shooting StarsKwara United

Shooting quality

Shooting Stars: Counter-attackingKwara United: Counter-attacking
Shooting StarsKwara United
Accuracy (shots on target)29%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.26
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.530.81

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kwara United is 11% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Shooting Stars · 2 pts / match - Kwara United

Shooting Stars
WWLWL
Season result split
45% W15% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-13
1.52 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
13-2-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kwara United
WDLWW
Season result split
33% W27% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-13
1.27 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-11
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shooting Stars is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.06 goals / match - Shooting Stars · 0.88 goals / match - Kwara United

Kwara United is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.09 goals / match - Shooting Stars · 0.88 goals / match - Kwara United

Shooting Stars scoring profile: strong

Shooting Stars scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Kwara United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

Kwara United scoring profile: strong

Kwara United scores in 55% of matches (18 of 33 matches), while Shooting Stars keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

35Goals scored (season)29
Shooting StarsKwara United
36Goals conceded (season)29
Shooting StarsKwara United
2.15Average goals in match1.76
Shooting StarsKwara United
8Goals scored (last 5)7
Shooting StarsKwara United
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
Shooting StarsKwara United

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal55%
Shooting StarsKwara United
30%2 goals27%
Shooting StarsKwara United
12%3 goals6%
Shooting StarsKwara United
3%4 goals0%
Shooting StarsKwara United

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal64%
Shooting StarsKwara United
24%2 goals15%
Shooting StarsKwara United
6%3 goals9%
Shooting StarsKwara United
3%4 goals0%
Shooting StarsKwara United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

37%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time18%
Shooting StarsKwara United
6%BTTS in both halves3%
Shooting StarsKwara United
24%Scored in both halves21%
Shooting StarsKwara United

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Shooting StarsKwara United
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Shooting StarsKwara United
60%BTTS - last 540%
Shooting StarsKwara United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Shooting StarsKwara United
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Shooting StarsKwara United
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Shooting StarsKwara United

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Shooting StarsKwara United
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Shooting StarsKwara United
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Shooting StarsKwara United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shooting Stars is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Shooting Stars · 1.3 pts / match - Kwara United

Shooting Stars - half-time state
33% leading36% draw30% trailing
Kwara United - half-time state
27% leading48% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.3
Shooting StarsKwara United
0.55Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Shooting StarsKwara United
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Shooting StarsKwara United
1.06Average goals (1st half)0.97
Shooting StarsKwara United
55%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Shooting StarsKwara United
55%No goal before half-time55%
Shooting StarsKwara United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Shooting StarsKwara United
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
Shooting StarsKwara United
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Shooting StarsKwara United
1.09Average goals (2nd half)0.79
Shooting StarsKwara United
48%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Shooting StarsKwara United
61%No goal after half-time70%
Shooting StarsKwara United

Shooting Stars - second-half results

21% W52% D27% L
45
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kwara United - second-half results

21% W55% D24% L
43
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shooting Stars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kwara United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Shooting Stars
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
6
7
16-30
5
5
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
7
61-75
11
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Kwara United
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
4
8
16-30
9
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
18%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Shooting Stars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
195%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Kwara United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
157%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Shooting StarsLigaKwara United
Average goals in match 2.151.94 1.76
Both teams scored 39%37% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%29% 24%
Clean sheets 24%38% 36%
Goal before half-time 73%59% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%62% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.94
Average goals per match
37%
Both teams scored
29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
0.56
Away goals / match
+146%
Home attack advantage
+59%
Home defence advantage
+50%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Shooting Stars 0 - 1 - 0 Kwara United. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Shooting Stars vs Kwara United?

The NPFL match finished Shooting Stars 0:0 Kwara United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Shooting Stars vs Kwara United?

Shooting Stars score 1.06 goals per game on average and Kwara United 0.88. The NPFL average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Shooting Stars's matches and 33% of Kwara United's.

What form are Shooting Stars and Kwara United in?

Over the last 5 games Shooting Stars have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Kwara United 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shooting Stars vs Kwara United?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shooting Stars vs Kwara United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.