Shooting Stars vs Kwara United: match statistics
Shooting Stars vs Kwara United: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Shooting Stars played Kwara United in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Shooting Stars: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Kwara United: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Shooting Stars scores 1.06 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Kwara United scores 0.88 and concedes 0.88. League average: 1.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Shooting Stars 39%, Kwara United 33%. Over 2.5: Shooting Stars 33%, Kwara United 24%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 29%.
xG, shots and style
Shooting Stars has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.04. Shooting Stars: 6.8 shots per match, Kwara United: 4.1.
Match halves
Shooting Stars: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.52. Kwara United: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.36.
Goals by minute
Shooting Stars: 76-90+ (11 goals). Kwara United: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 1.94 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 29%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1) — Shooting Stars have a clear home advantage: they have won 81% of home matches, possess a +17 home goal difference and average 1.81 goals per home game. Offensively the hosts create more and higher-quality chances: 11.08 average shots per match and 3.75 on target versus Kwara United’s 6.7 and 2.4, with the hosts’ shot conversion at 16% compared to just 6% for the visitors. Differences in expected chance value also favor the hosts — average home xG for the hosts is 1.51, while Kwara’s away xG is 0.92. Defensively the hosts concede 0.75 goals per home match with an average xG against of 0.79 and keep a clean sheet in 38% of games, whereas Kwara concede 1.38 goals away with xG against of 1.66 and only 13% clean sheets. Although Kwara United have a better recent points average over the last five matches (2.0 vs 1.8) and also 3 wins in their last 5, their high rate of failing to score away (63% of away matches without a goal) severely limits their realistic chances.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I pick 'No' (no BTTS) because Shooting Stars have a seasonal average of 1.24 goals scored and only 0.41 conceded per match and keep a clean sheet in 59% of home games, while Kwara United average just 0.50 goals away. Seasonal BTTS rates are 29% for hosts and 38% for visitors, with league BTTS at 37%, so both teams scoring simultaneously is relatively uncommon. xG data shows Shooting Stars create 1.20 xG per match, whereas Kwara generate 0.92 xG on the road while conceding 1.66 xG; despite that Kwara have a low conversion of 6% with on average 6.7 shots and 2.4 shots on target. Last 5 matches give mixed signals (hosts 8 scored and 6 conceded, visitors 7:4), however the hosts’ long-term defensive edge (0.41 conceded and 59% clean sheets) and Kwara’s poor finishing (0.50 goals per match) argue against BTTS. I estimate probability for 'No' at about 70% versus 30% for 'Yes', therefore the strongest signal from the data is a 'No' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and statistical analysis I estimated goals: home xG 1.20 vs away xG conceded 1.66 — the mean gives ~1.43 expected goals for Shooting Stars; for Kwara United attack xG is 0.92 and xG conceded by the home side is 0.93, yielding ~0.93, total = 2.36 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.36 yields ~68% probability for Over 1.5, 42% for Over 2.5 and only ~21% for Over 3.5, so Under 3.5 is the statistically stronger scenario. Seasonal percentages corroborate a conservative match profile: Over 2.5 occurred for the home team in only 24% of matches and for the away team in 25%, while Over 3.5 was just 6% and 19% (Under 3.5: 94% and 81%). Additionally, Shooting Stars average 1.24 goals scored at home and only 0.41 conceded, with 59% clean sheets, which reduces the risk of a very high-scoring game. Although both teams have scored more often in their last 5 matches (last 5: 8 and 7 goals scored), the hosts’ dominant defensive metrics and the low seasonal frequency of matches above 3.5 goals make Under 3.5 the best signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Shooting Stars lead at the break in 53% of home matches (9 times) and average 0.65 goals scored by half-time while conceding only 0.06, which strongly favors them in the first half. Kwara United average 0.38 goals scored by half-time and concede 0.88; away they have only a 6% win rate and 0% leads at the break, so their chances of taking the lead before half-time are minimal. Over the full match Shooting Stars win 59% of home games, have xG_for 1.2 versus visitors’ xG 0.92 and average 10.25 shots (3.38 on target) compared to Kwara’s 6.7 (2.4), indicating game control and better chance conversion. Additionally, the hosts keep a clean sheet at half-time in 94% of home fixtures and score on average 0.59 goals in second halves while conceding 0.35, therefore the most likely HT/FT scenario is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Shooting Stars | Kwara United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.26 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.53 | 0.81 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kwara United is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Shooting Stars · 2 pts / match - Kwara United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shooting Stars is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Shooting Stars · 0.88 goals / match - Kwara United
Kwara United is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Shooting Stars · 0.88 goals / match - Kwara United
Shooting Stars scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Kwara United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).
Kwara United scores in 55% of matches (18 of 33 matches), while Shooting Stars keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shooting Stars
Over / Under - Kwara United
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shooting Stars is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Shooting Stars · 1.3 pts / match - Kwara United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shooting Stars - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kwara United - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Shooting Stars
Kwara United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Shooting Stars | Liga | Kwara United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.15 | 1.94 | ▼ 1.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 39% | 37% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▼ 24% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 38% | ▼ 36% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▼ 55% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Shooting Stars 0 - 1 - 0 Kwara United. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Shooting Stars vs Kwara United?
The NPFL match finished Shooting Stars 0:0 Kwara United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shooting Stars vs Kwara United?
Shooting Stars score 1.06 goals per game on average and Kwara United 0.88. The NPFL average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 29% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Shooting Stars's matches and 33% of Kwara United's.
What form are Shooting Stars and Kwara United in?
Over the last 5 games Shooting Stars have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Kwara United 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shooting Stars vs Kwara United?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Shooting Stars vs Kwara United: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


