Silkeborg vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Silkeborg played AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 21 November 2025. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Silkeborg: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. AGF: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Silkeborg scores 1.47 and concedes 1.93 goals per match. AGF scores 2.00 and concedes 1.13. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Silkeborg 67%, AGF 73%. Over 2.5: Silkeborg 60%, AGF 60%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 59%.

xG, shots and style

AGF has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.32. Silkeborg: 11.3 shots per match, AGF: 16.7.

Match halves

Silkeborg: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47. AGF: half-time lead 73%, second-half goals 0.93.

Goals by minute

Silkeborg: 31-45+ (6 goals). AGF: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Superliga: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 59%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
SilkeborgAGF
7Shots16
SilkeborgAGF
4Shots on target4
SilkeborgAGF
1.56xG1.85
SilkeborgAGF
5Corners4
SilkeborgAGF
116Dangerous attacks79
SilkeborgAGF
6Fouls11
SilkeborgAGF
0Cards0
SilkeborgAGF

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.47Goals scored / match2
SilkeborgAGF
1.93Goals conceded / match1.13
SilkeborgAGF
50%Average possession54%
SilkeborgAGF
4.8Shots on target / match5.67
SilkeborgAGF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match16.73
SilkeborgAGF
4.8Shots on target5.67
SilkeborgAGF
12.9%Shot conversion12%
SilkeborgAGF
50%Possession54%
SilkeborgAGF
1.32xG for1.85
SilkeborgAGF
1.77xG against1.29
SilkeborgAGF

Shooting quality

Silkeborg: BalancedAGF: Attacking
SilkeborgAGF
Accuracy (shots on target)42%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AGF is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Silkeborg · 1.6 pts / match - AGF

Silkeborg
LWWLD
Season result split
33% W20% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-7
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
AGF
WDWDL
Season result split
60% W27% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-2
2.07 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.07Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGF is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

1.47 goals / match - Silkeborg · 2 goals / match - AGF

AGF is 71% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.93 goals / match - Silkeborg · 1.13 goals / match - AGF

Silkeborg scoring profile: strong

Silkeborg scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).

AGF scoring profile: very strong

AGF scores in 93% of matches (14 of 15 matches), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 15 matches).

22Goals scored (season)30
SilkeborgAGF
29Goals conceded (season)17
SilkeborgAGF
3.4Average goals in match3.13
SilkeborgAGF
7Goals scored (last 5)10
SilkeborgAGF
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
SilkeborgAGF

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal93%
SilkeborgAGF
47%2 goals53%
SilkeborgAGF
27%3 goals33%
SilkeborgAGF
7%4 goals13%
SilkeborgAGF

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal73%
SilkeborgAGF
60%2 goals27%
SilkeborgAGF
27%3 goals13%
SilkeborgAGF
7%4 goals0%
SilkeborgAGF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

47%BTTS at half-time27%
SilkeborgAGF
20%BTTS in both halves0%
SilkeborgAGF
33%Scored in both halves27%
SilkeborgAGF

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
SilkeborgAGF
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SilkeborgAGF
80%BTTS - last 580%
SilkeborgAGF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

93%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
SilkeborgAGF
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
SilkeborgAGF
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
SilkeborgAGF

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
SilkeborgAGF
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
SilkeborgAGF
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
SilkeborgAGF

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGF is 89% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / match - Silkeborg · 2.4 pts / match - AGF

Silkeborg - half-time state
33% leading27% draw40% trailing
AGF - half-time state
73% leading20% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per match (1st half)2.4
SilkeborgAGF
1Goals scored (1st half)1.07
SilkeborgAGF
1.07Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
SilkeborgAGF
2.07Average goals (1st half)1.4
SilkeborgAGF
27%Clean sheet before half-time67%
SilkeborgAGF
33%No goal before half-time27%
SilkeborgAGF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.53
SilkeborgAGF
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.93
SilkeborgAGF
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
SilkeborgAGF
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.73
SilkeborgAGF
40%Clean sheet after half-time47%
SilkeborgAGF
67%No goal after half-time53%
SilkeborgAGF

Silkeborg - second-half results

27% W27% D47% L
19
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AGF - second-half results

40% W33% D27% L
36
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 73% of matches and wins 60%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Silkeborg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match1.40.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.40.6
1 goal100%60%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal20%100%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
AGF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.80
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Silkeborg
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
6
31-45
1
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

AGF
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
6
1
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.26
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Silkeborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

SilkeborgLigaAGF
Average goals in match 3.403.20 3.13
Both teams scored 67%61% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%59% 60%
Clean sheets 0%21% 27%
Goal before half-time 93%77% 80%
Goal after half-time 73%76% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.54
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
10%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AGFSubstitutionOn: Oskar Skou HaugstrupOff: Kevin Yakob
  2. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Callum McCowattOff: Younes Bakiz
  3. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Alexander Illum SimmelhackOff: Rami Hajal

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Jakob A. SundbergMatches officiated: 16
3.94Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 219%Home wins38%Draws44%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Silkeborg 0 - 0 - 1 AGF. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Aarhus Gymnastikforening
3 : 1
Silkeborg IF

FAQ

What was the result of Silkeborg vs AGF?

The Superliga match finished Silkeborg 0:2 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Silkeborg vs AGF?

Silkeborg score 1.47 goals per game on average and AGF 2.00. The Superliga average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Silkeborg's matches and 73% of AGF's.

What form are Silkeborg and AGF in?

Over the last 5 games Silkeborg have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and AGF 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Silkeborg vs AGF?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Silkeborg vs AGF: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.